录像审议在我国竞技跆拳道比赛中的运用现状以及对策研究

发布时间：2018-07-12 08:02

本文选题：跆拳道 + 竞赛规则　；参考：《北京体育大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：竞技跆拳道属打点计分交手对抗类项目,跆拳道腿法踢击速度快,隐蔽性强,为观众带来感官刺激的同时也为裁判员的计分与判罚带来了一定难度,导致裁判员在比赛中会出现误判、漏判、错判的情况。随着即时回放系统在跆拳道比赛中的应用,在一定程度上纠正了裁判员在比赛中出现的误判、漏判和错判,减少比赛中出现的争议。本文把录像审议条款在比赛中的应用情况作为研究对象。采用文献资料法、专家访谈法、问卷调查法、数理统计法对录像审议条款在我国竞技跆拳道比赛中的应用情况进行研究。分析了录像审议条款在四届比赛中的运用情况；概括了录像审议条款实施后给裁判员、教练员、运动员带来的影响；探讨了录像审议条款实施过程中存在的问题并提出解决对策。研究结果表明：1.录像审议条款的实施向规范化、标准化的方向发展。录像审议提出率呈逐年上升的趋势,录像审议更改判罚率逐年下降。提出录像审议申请内容以击头录像审议为主。2.录像审议条款的实施对裁判员的打分与判罚起到辅助作用,为裁判员提供及时的纠错机制。由于比赛实施“两审终审制”录像审议委员肩负着维护比赛公平、公正、公开的重要职责。但在对裁判员、录像审议委员的监管方面仍有提升空间。3.录像审议条款的实施对教练员的语言表达能力、战术分析能力以及与运动员的默契配合方面提出了更高的要求。对运动员的心理承受能力、规则理解能力以及战术安排设定了新的标准。4.录像审议硬件设施无法满足日渐激烈的跆拳道比赛。录像回放画面的分辨率以及回放角度无法做到高清晰、多角度,不便于录像审议委员做出精准的判罚。录像审议画面的公开范围不够全面。5.录像审议条款的实施对跆拳道比赛的连贯性带来一定程度的影响。录像审议提出的申清流程有待完善,教练员向主裁陈述、主裁向录像审议委员转述环节不被公众知晓,存在偏差的可能性。
[Abstract]:Competitive taekwondo is a kind of item of scoring and fighting against each other. Taekwondo leg kick is fast and hidden, which brings sensory stimulation to the audience and also brings some difficulty to the judges' scoring and punishment. The result is that the referee will misjudge, miss and misjudge in the match. With the application of the real-time playback system in taekwondo games, the misjudgment, omission and misjudgment of the referee in the match are corrected to a certain extent, and the controversy in the match is reduced. In this paper, the video review clause in the application of the competition as the object of study. The application of video review clause in competitive taekwondo competition in China was studied by means of literature, expert interview, questionnaire and mathematical statistics. This paper analyzes the application of the video review clause in the four competitions, summarizes the influence of the video review clause on the referees, coaches and athletes after the implementation of the video review clause. This paper discusses the problems existing in the implementation of the video review clause and puts forward some countermeasures. The results of the study show that 1: 1. The implementation of the video review clause develops towards standardization and standardization. The rate of video review and presentation increased year by year, and the rate of revision of video review and punishment decreased year by year. Put forward video review application content to the head of the video review of the main. 2. The implementation of the video review clause assists the referee in scoring and punishment, and provides a timely error correction mechanism for the referee. Because of the implementation of the "two-instance system of final appeal" video review committee shoulder the important responsibility of maintaining fair, fair and open competition. But there is still room for improvement in the supervision of referees, video reviewers. The implementation of the video review clause puts forward higher requirements for the coaches' language expression ability, tactical analysis ability and tacit cooperation with athletes. Set a new standard for athletes' mental endurance, understanding of rules, and tactical arrangements. Video review hardware facilities can not meet the increasingly fierce Taekwondo competition. The resolution and angle of video playback can not be high-definition and multi-angle, which is not convenient for the video reviewer to make accurate decision. Video review of the picture of the open scope is not comprehensive. 5. The implementation of the video review clause has a certain degree of impact on the consistency of taekwondo competition. The process of video review and presentation needs to be improved, the coaches make statements to the referee, and the referee reports to the video reviewer that the link is not known to the public, and there is the possibility of deviation.
【学位授予单位】：北京体育大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：G886.9

【相似文献】