世界女子排球主攻队员攻防能力的比较研究
[Abstract]:Chinese women's volleyball team is a team with glorious history. The main attacking athletes have indelible achievements in the development history of Chinese women's volleyball team. From the development of the modern world's high-level women's volleyball team, it can be seen that the proportion of the main attacking players in the attack is constantly increasing in the defense system, and the main attacker also occupies an important position. Its defensive ability has also become one of the important factors that determine the result of the game. This research through the literature data method, the video observation method, the mathematical statistics method and the expert interview method to the 2015 women's volleyball world cup top three teams attack and defense effect and the data contrast analysis comparison and comparison obtains the following conclusion: 1. In this World Cup match, the Chinese team's starting main attack and the substitute's main attack can finish the task very well in the spike aspect, and guarantee the higher spiking success rate and the score rate, the Serbia second, the American team's main offensive player is relatively weak. And. In this World Cup competition, the three teams' main attackers are mainly 4-point high, but Serbia and the United States are relatively rich in the main attack tactics, the Chinese team's main attack tactics are relatively single .2. In blocking, China's main attacker's blocking height, success rate and average block score per game were higher than Serbia and the United States, but also significantly higher in error than the other two teams. In terms of service, China's serve was significantly better than the other two teams, followed by Serbia, the United States underperforming China and Serbia's .4. Defensively, the United States' four main players were among the best in the pilling rate and had the least errors, but were not as good as China and Serbia in the defense against the drop, and the Chinese team was the best in the defense of the ball. China and Serbia are on the same track, but the United States' four main teams are significantly stronger than China and Serbia.
【学位授予单位】:东北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G842
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨管;李毅钧;;第12届世界杯赛中国女排攻防能力剖析[J];体育学刊;2016年04期
2 茅菊兰;;2015年世界女排大奖赛中外主攻队员发球技术对比分析[J];哈尔滨体育学院学报;2016年03期
3 任静;;中外女子排球优秀主攻进攻能力的比较研究[J];体育科技;2015年06期
4 葛春林;郝霖霖;张波;王彤;;2015年女排世界杯中国女排接发球进攻及防守反击特点分析[J];北京体育大学学报;2015年11期
5 马金凤;;第17届世界女排锦标赛美国、巴西与中国竞技实力比较研究[J];吉林体育学院学报;2015年04期
6 岳凤霞;轩苏磊;;2013年世界女排大奖赛总决赛运动员身体形态和网上高度的对比分析[J];搏击(体育论坛);2014年07期
7 邓龙;李斌;;2013年世界女排大奖赛总决赛中国女排技术统计分析[J];长江大学学报(自科版);2014年01期
8 孟春雷;李毅钧;;中外优秀女排运动员拦网技战术的比较研究[J];北京体育大学学报;2013年05期
9 陆卫平;彭一腾;霍鑫;;2010年世界女排大奖赛中国队与世界强队得分能力比较[J];首都体育学院学报;2013年01期
10 杨学智;;优秀女子排球主攻手技术性进攻能力评价体系构建[J];中国体育科技;2010年06期
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 武囡;2015年女排世界杯中外女排进攻打法的比较研究[D];河北师范大学;2016年
2 时倩雯;中国女排“主攻—主攻—接应”组合效能对比研究[D];苏州大学;2016年
3 李雯;2014年世界女排锦标赛中外强队主攻手攻防技术对比分析[D];成都体育学院;2015年
4 夏海英;2014世锦赛中国女排主攻队员与对手技术运用效果的比较分析[D];扬州大学;2015年
5 张嵬;世界女排大奖赛中国与国外女排主攻手攻防能力对比分析[D];广西民族大学;2015年
6 赵余恒;第11届女排世界杯中国队与比赛对手防守技术效果分析与研究[D];太原理工大学;2013年
7 库晶;2011年世界女排大奖赛中国女排与世界强队实力对比分析[D];长江大学;2013年
8 杨斌爽;近十年世界优秀排球队主要得分手若干技术和非技术特征的研究[D];南京师范大学;2013年
9 王晓燕;中国女排与世界优秀女排强攻能力对比分析[D];福建师范大学;2012年
10 陈军;中国女排与世界强队技术运用对比研究[D];河北师范大学;2011年
,本文编号:2177124
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/2177124.html