不同教学顺序在标枪教学过程中的对比实验研究
[Abstract]:At present, most of the javelin teaching courses in our country's higher physical education colleges adopt the traditional teaching, which starts from the final stage of javelin launching, and then studies the throwing steps and run-up techniques. This kind of teaching method can make students master javelin technique quickly, but some problems have appeared in the same teaching mode for a long time, such as the students' throwing step rhythm is not right or the run-up speed is not obvious and so on. In order to solve these problems and achieve the purpose of improving the present situation of javelin teaching, the comparative teaching experiment of different teaching sequence is adopted to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the two teaching sequences. It is hoped that it can provide a reference teaching mode and train of thought for the first line teachers of track and field, so that the teachers can get inspiration from it, and also provide some modification scheme for improving the present situation of track and field teaching in physical education colleges and universities. At present, there are few researches on different teaching sequence in javelin teaching in all kinds of literature. The research in this paper has the significance of filling the blank of domestic research in a certain sense, and can lay a foundation for the same kind of in-depth research. Class 2016, Class 3 and Class 12, Beijing Institute of physical Education, were selected as the experimental objects. The basic physical fitness of the two classes was tested before the experiment. The pre-test showed that there was no obvious difference between the two classes. The experimental class adopts reverse teaching, while the control class adopts traditional teaching. In the whole course of the research, the methods of literature, observation, mathematical statistics, experiment and so on are used to ensure that the same teacher will teach in the experimental class and the control class under the same teaching content and teaching scene, and the teaching progress is the same. After the completion of the teaching, the two classes were evaluated and tested respectively, and the following conclusions were drawn by analyzing the video recording: 1. In the general javelin teaching course in higher sports colleges, the two teaching methods can make the students master javelin technique to a certain extent. Because of the limited teaching time, the experimental class with "reverse teaching" has a slight advantage over the control class in terms of the technical evaluation results and the standard achievement. But the difference is not very big. 2. 2 students in the javelin complete technology is better than the control class. The emphasis of the traditional teaching method of the control class lies in the technique of throwing guns in situ. In practice, most of the students adopt in situ practice, which results in the students prone to form the motive force of throwing guns in situ, and all kinds of actions are distorted when they are in complete run-up. The teaching emphasis of the experimental group is on throwing step technique. In practice, most of the students adopt the exercise in the movement, and the movement of the complete run-up throw gun is more smooth. 3. The javelin throwing movement is a highly technical competitive sport. The structure of the movement is complex, and it is very difficult for the students in physical education colleges to learn. It is very difficult to make the students master the javelin technique through the teaching of only eight classes. So it is very important to use teaching method and practice method in the course of teaching. In learning some complex movements, only mechanized exercises are often ineffective, the use of targeted exercises can better help students understand the composition of the movement.
【学位授予单位】:北京体育大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G824.3-4
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李云捧,王小平,陈阁;关于标枪教学的几点体会[J];承德民族师专学报;2000年04期
2 王联聪,郑捷,吴惠丽;现代男子标枪运动发展态势[J];中国体育科技;2001年S1期
3 李登光;对世界男子标枪运动发展特点及趋势的研究[J];中国体育科技;2002年02期
4 孙金镯;标枪技术教学六注意[J];田径;2004年08期
5 崔志年;黎为民;王丽杰;;标枪课开设情况调查分析及对策[J];牡丹江师范学院学报(自然科学版);2006年01期
6 汤乃童;丁雷;;对掷标枪最后用力身体左侧动作与右侧动作关系的探析[J];福建体育科技;2007年04期
7 赵晓红;;浙江省少年乙组标枪运动员身体形态现状与评价[J];浙江体育科学;2007年06期
8 易建军;;我国男子标枪竞技水平停滞不前的主要因素及对策研究[J];贵州体育科技;2009年03期
9 易建军;戴海滨;;我国男子标枪竞技水平停滞不前的主要因素及对策研究[J];辽宁体育科技;2009年06期
10 孙金镯;王锡明;;提高标枪技术训练的有效方法[J];体育世界(学术版);2009年10期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 王利勇;冯连江;黄林;;我国优秀男子标枪运动员交叉步技术三维运动学分析[A];第十届全国运动生物力学学术交流大会论文汇编[C];2002年
2 王倩;吴东明;;世界优秀标枪选手投掷时速度变化特征与评价[A];第十届全国运动生物力学学术交流大会论文汇编[C];2002年
3 鲍克;牛瑞强;;核心稳定性训练对标枪投掷成绩的影响研究[A];第九届全国体育科学大会论文摘要汇编(3)[C];2011年
4 史航昊;;国内标枪运动研究的现状及发展——基于2000—2010年3种体育学核心期刊的文献计量分析[A];中国体育科学学会运动训练学分会第六届全国田径运动发展研究成果交流会论文集[C];2013年
5 樊玉杰;王彦军;;少年标枪运动员基础训练方法的探析[A];中国体育科学学会运动训练学分会第六届全国田径运动发展研究成果交流会论文集[C];2013年
6 任丽娜;曹申;宋瑞玲;;我国少年男子标枪运动员成绩预测模型的建立[A];中国体育科学学会运动训练学分会第六届全国田径运动发展研究成果交流会论文集[C];2013年
7 杜和平;王玮;张莹;王卉;;优化体育专业普修掷标枪教学方案的实验研究[A];第十六届全国高校田径科研论文报告会论文专辑[C];2006年
8 吴翱;刘鹏;;标枪运动员专项体能的结构与训练内容的研究[A];第十五届全国高校田径科研论文报告会论文专辑[C];2005年
9 张茜;张秀凤;纪仲秋;;对北京高校部分优秀运动员标枪技术最后用力阶段的生物力学研究[A];第十三届全国运动生物力学学术交流大会论文汇编[C];2009年
10 王港;张灵甲;;男子标枪运动员最后用力阶段表面肌电图研究[A];中国体育科学学会运动训练学分会第四届全国田径运动发展研究成果交流会论文集[C];2011年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 王倩;影响标枪飞行远度的系统因素及投掷技术的综合分析[D];北京体育大学;2000年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 席本玉;不同重量标枪对掷标枪最后用力技术影响的研究[D];西安体育学院;2011年
2 徐启铭;标枪运动员最后用力阶段技术特征的“个体化”动力学研究[D];陕西师范大学;2015年
3 郭恩次;对我国部分优秀男子标枪运动员投掷技术的运动学分析[D];成都体育学院;2015年
4 闫永华;微视频反馈在标枪教学中预防及纠正错误动作的应用研究[D];西安体育学院;2016年
5 高伟强;快速伸缩复合练习在标枪技术教学中的实验研究[D];北京体育大学;2016年
6 龙沧浩;我国标枪项目国家集训队备战2014年仁川亚运会训练研究[D];北京体育大学;2016年
7 许庆超;功能性训练对标枪二级运动员最后用力技术影响的实验研究[D];武汉体育学院;2016年
8 谭梦超;北京体育大学竞技体校标枪队冬训期专项力量训练的研究[D];北京体育大学;2017年
9 代一帆;不同教学顺序在标枪教学过程中的对比实验研究[D];北京体育大学;2017年
10 牟月青;对我国优秀男子标枪运动员最后用力阶段的运动学分析[D];西安体育学院;2017年
,本文编号:2188412
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/2188412.html