当前位置:主页 > 教育论文 > 体育论文 >

对近三年ICU世界啦啦队锦标赛花球啦啦队前三名队伍成套设计的研究

发布时间:2018-08-26 08:06
【摘要】:啦啦队运动包括舞蹈啦啦队和技巧啦啦队两大类,其中花球啦啦队是非常典型的啦啦队项目,通过肢体的短暂加速、制动定位来体现花球啦啦队特有的力度感;通过运动过程中重心平稳、身体控制精确、位置准确来体现花球啦啦队特有的控制度;通过动作的配合、各类难度的展现、不同队形的转换以及层次对比组合的运用来体现花球啦啦队特有的视觉冲击力;通过团队的高度一致性和表演的激情、自信、感染力来体现花球啦啦队特有的团队精神。2017-2020年是啦啦队全新的周期,花球啦啦队项目的发展与更新将会是过去周期的全新总结和延续,科学、合理、创新、独特的编排设计理念与技术动作的完美完成是优秀的花球啦啦队成套呈现的基石。因此,本人通过分析研究2014-2016年ICU世界啦啦队锦标赛花球啦啦队前三名的高水平队伍成套的动作结构、成套设计及技术动作的变化发展,找出近三年花球啦啦队设计、技术动作的发展趋势和走向,从而期望对我国新周期的花球啦啦队的成套设计的进步做出一份贡献。1.难度动作的设计中,难度级别提升,且三大类难度动作均衡分布,美国队与日本队的多难度连接较多,充分体现了三年内世界花球啦啦队在难度动作上的进步以及难度动作艺术表现上的创新。2.托举动作前三名队伍各有所长,美国队通过组数和动作设计来表现托举技术,日本队通过被托举队员的技术技巧来表现托举技术,但其14-15年的托举动作相同,且在2016年0托举动作的现象说明了其与美国队的差距。3.配合动作在2014-2016年间,日本队的设计与运用最为突出,在花球交换、抛接的动作设计上日本队不断创新,设计了复杂多样的多种花球运用形式,但出现少量的失误。4.队形的创新和空间、场地的合理、多样化运用在2016年前三名成套中明显超越2014-2015年的成套设计,表现为复合形队形增多、三个空间运用数量及多位置场地运用数量的增加,美国队最为明显。5.近三年前三名队伍的成套动作完成情况明显提高,出现的失误数量明显减少,前三名的完成情况均与其成绩相一致,说明难度设计选择与队员实际完成能力及训练的有效性的紧密关系。
[Abstract]:Cheerleading sports include dance cheerleading and technical cheerleading, among which, flower ball cheerleading is a very typical cheerleading event, through the body of the temporary acceleration, braking positioning to reflect the ball cheerleading unique sense of strength; Through the smooth center of gravity, accurate body control, accurate position to reflect the unique control of the ball cheerleading; through the coordination of the movement, all kinds of difficulty show, The transformation of different formations and the use of different levels of comparison to reflect the unique visual impact of the ball cheerleading; through the team of high consistency and performance of passion, self-confidence, Appeal to reflect the unique team spirit of the ball cheerleading. 2017-2020 is a new cycle of cheerleading, the development and renewal of the cheerleading project will be a new summary and continuation of the past cycle, scientific, reasonable, innovative, The unique arrangement design idea and the perfect completion of the technical action is the foundation stone of the excellent flower ball cheerleading complete set presentation. Therefore, through the analysis and study of the action structure, complete set design and the change and development of the technical action of the top three top teams in the ICU World cheerleading Championship from 2014 to 2016, I find out the design of the ball cheerleading team in the last three years. The development trend and trend of technical action, so as to expect to make a contribution to the development of the complete set design of the new cycle of the flower ball cheerleading in our country. In the design of difficult movements, the difficulty level is raised, and the three major types of difficulty movements are evenly distributed. The United States team and the Japanese team have more multi-difficulty connections. It fully reflects the progress of the world flower cheerleading team in the difficulty movement and the innovation of the difficulty movement art expression within three years. Each of the top three teams has its own strong points. The United States team expresses the lifting technique through group number and motion design, while the Japanese team expresses the lifting technique through the technical skills of the supported team members, but their 14-15 years of support movements are the same. And the 0 lift in 2016 shows the gap between the team and the United States. 3. 3. In 2014-2016, the Japanese team's design and application was the most prominent. In the design of the ball exchange and throwing, the Japanese team innovated continuously, designed a variety of complicated and varied application forms of the ball, but there were a few mistakes. 4. The innovation and space of formation and the rational and diversified use of the site in the first three sets of positions in 2016 obviously exceed those of 2014-2015, as shown by the increase in the number of complex formations, the increase in the number of space applications and the increase in the number of multi-location sites, The US team was the most obvious. In the last three years, the completion of the complete sets of movements of the three teams has obviously improved, and the number of errors that have occurred has decreased significantly. The completion of the first three teams is consistent with their achievements. It shows the close relationship between the difficulty design choice and the actual completion ability of the players and the effectiveness of the training.
【学位授予单位】:广州体育学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G837

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 刘国纯;徐中秋;张茜;;中国啦啦队运动推广机制的回顾与思考[J];广州体育学院学报;2014年06期

2 李静;李悦;;论舞蹈啦啦操难度的编排[J];当代体育科技;2014年15期

3 吴小丽;赵跃哲;梁誉;;CBA啦啦队表演的美学特征[J];当代体育科技;2013年29期

4 鲁娟;;规则导向下舞蹈啦啦操的艺术审美[J];广州体育学院学报;2013年05期

5 杨莉;刘浩;;对影响花球舞蹈啦啦操编排因素的探讨[J];内蒙古体育科技;2013年03期

6 许小刚;;啦啦操运动在高校体育文化中的价值研究[J];长春教育学院学报;2013年07期

7 陆晶晶;张鹏飞;;啦啦队运动的美育功能研究[J];运动;2012年08期

8 雷雯;李鸿;;对啦啦队文化发展的审视与思考[J];成都体育学院学报;2011年12期

9 李德华;;从竞赛规则的变化探讨我国啦啦操的发展趋势[J];成都体育学院学报;2010年10期

10 王操惠;徐春林;;美国啦啦队运动产业化发展对我国的启示[J];武汉体育学院学报;2010年03期

相关硕士学位论文 前6条

1 葛胜楠;2014年啦啦操世锦赛舞蹈啦啦操前八名难度动作比较分析研究[D];华东师范大学;2015年

2 郁方;2014年啦啦操世锦赛花球舞蹈成套动作结构及动作技术分析研究[D];华东师范大学;2015年

3 索超超;我国啦啦操赛事推广分析[D];首都体育学院;2014年

4 郝仕芳;中美啦啦操赛事运行机制的比较分析[D];湖南师范大学;2012年

5 陆晶晶;啦啦队运动的审美特征与美育实践研究[D];河南大学;2011年

6 陈铁龙;论啦啦操的发展[D];湖南师范大学;2006年



本文编号:2204247

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/2204247.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户79a8f***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com