2016年里约奥运会中国男篮与对手攻、防指标的分析
发布时间：2018-09-11 11:33
【摘要】：运用秩和比综合评价(RSR)、数理统计和录像观察等方法,对第31届夏季奥林匹克运动会男子篮球比赛中12支参赛队伍进行指标量化分析,并对A组(中国队所在小组)6支球队技术统计进行分析比较。研究结果表明:在本届比赛12支参赛球队中,中国队参赛队员平均身高最高,达到203.83厘米;平均年龄最年轻,为23.42岁。在中国队队员出场时间方面,易建联的出场时间达到30分钟,在中国队中处于支柱地位;郭艾伦和周鹏场均出场时间在25分钟以上,在整个队伍中具有核心作用;李根、丁彦雨航等6名球员场均出场时间在15分钟以上,是中国队比赛中的重要组成部分;睢冉和李慕豪场均出场时间不足10分钟,在球队中处于边缘地位。进攻RSR值方面:评级为A的是美国队;评级为B级的有澳大利亚队等5支球队;评级为C级的有阿根廷队等3支球队;D级的有中国队。防守RSR方面:评为A级的有美国队;B级的有西班牙队等3支球队;C级的包括澳大利亚队等5支球队;中国队评级为D级。攻防RSR方面分析,A级仍然只有美国队一支球队;B级包括西班牙队等4支球队;C级包括巴西队等4支球队;中国队评级为D级。在小组赛对手对阵进攻数据对比分析中:总得分方面,与中国队呈现非常显著性差异有美国队等3队。在2分球投篮方面,在命中数方面与中国队存在显著差异的是美国队和塞尔维亚队。在3分球投篮方面,与中国队在3分球命中方面存在非常显著性差异美国队和澳大利亚队;与美国队在投篮方面存在非常显著性差异;与中国队在命中率方面存在显著性差异的有美国队和法国队。在罚球数方面,中国队与塞尔维亚队和法国队在罚球命中率方面呈现显著性差异,与其他球队不存在差异。在进攻篮板方面,中国队与美国队呈现非常显著性差异。在快攻得分方面,中国队与美国队快攻得分相差12.68分,呈现显著性差异,与其他球队不存在差异。在失误方面,中国队场均17.80次,与美国队呈现非常显著性差异,与塞尔维亚队不存在差异。在小组赛对手对阵防守数据对比分析中:在防守篮板方面,美国队场均防守篮板为29.38个,与中国队呈现非常显著性差异;塞尔维亚队场均防守篮板为25.13个,与中国队呈非常显著性差异;法国队场均防守篮板个数为27.33个,与中国队呈非常显著性差异;澳大利亚队场均防守篮板个数为26.13个,与中国队成非常显著性差异;委内瑞拉队与中国队不存在差异。在犯规方面,中国队场均犯规数最多,与法国队呈现显著性差异。中国队与小组赛对手在抢断、盖帽和利用失误得分方面不存在差异。建议:1)增加中国队与世界强队交手机会。2)优化中国队阵容配置。3)加强投篮能力,特别是3分球。4)强化身体对抗,增强比赛中体能储备。5)增加跑位能力,避免“单打独斗”。6)积极冲抢、卡位,全队拼抢篮板。
[Abstract]:By using rank sum ratio (RSR) comprehensive evaluation of (RSR), mathematical statistics and video observation, the quantitative analysis of 12 teams in the men's basketball competition of the 31st Summer Olympic Games was carried out. The technical statistics of 6 teams in Group A (China team) are analyzed and compared. The results show that the average height of the Chinese team is the highest, reaching 203.83 cm, and the average age is 23.42 years old. In the Chinese team, Yi Jianlian's appearance time reached 30 minutes, playing in the mainstay of the Chinese team; Guo Allen and Zhou Peng each played more than 25 minutes, playing a central role in the entire team. Ding Yanyu and other six players played more than 15 minutes per game, which was an important part of the Chinese team, while Sui ran and Li Muhao played less than 10 minutes and were on the edge of the team. Offensive RSR: a rating of the United States; B rating of Australia and other five teams; C rating of Argentina and other three teams, including the Chinese team. Defense in RSR: a rating of the United States, B, Spain and other three teams, including Australia, including five teams; the Chinese team rated D. Analysis on the RSR of attack and Defense there is still only one American team in Grade A and four teams in Grade B, including Spain, and Grade C, including Brazil, and the Chinese team is rated D. In the group match attack data comparison analysis: the total score aspect and the Chinese team presents the very significant difference has the American team and so on 3 teams. In terms of 2-point shots, the United States and Serbia differ significantly from the Chinese team in the number of hits. In the aspect of 3-point shooting, there are very significant differences between USA and China in 3-point shots, and there are very significant differences between USA and USA in shooting. There is a significant difference between the Chinese team and the United States and France in the shooting rate. In terms of the number of free throws, there is a significant difference between China and Serbia and France in the percentage of free-throw hits, but there is no difference between China and other teams. In offensive rebounds, the Chinese team and the United States presented a very significant difference. In terms of fast break score, the difference between Chinese team and American team is 12.68 points, showing significant difference, and there is no difference with other teams. In terms of errors, the Chinese team averaged 17.80 games, showing a very significant difference with the United States and no difference with Serbia. In the comparison and analysis of the defensive data of the opponents in the group stage: in the defensive rebounds, the average defensive rebounds of the US team were 29.38, which was very significant difference with the Chinese team, while the Serbia team averaged 25.13 defensive rebounds per game. There were significant differences between French team and Chinese team, 27.33 between French team and Chinese team, 26.13 between Australia team and Chinese team, and there was significant difference between Australia team and Chinese team. There is no difference between Venezuela and China. In terms of fouls, China has the most fouls per game, showing significant differences with France. There is no difference between Chinese team and group-stage opponents in steals, blocks and error scores. It is suggested that: (1) increase the chance of the Chinese team playing against the strong teams in the world (.2) optimize the Chinese team's lineup allocation (.3) strengthen the shooting ability, especially the 3-point ball (.4) strengthen the physical confrontation, strengthen the physical reserve in the game, and increase the ability to move. Avoid "single fight" 6. 6) actively rush and grab, clamp, the whole team rebounds.
【学位授予单位】：山西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G841
本文编号：2236579
[Abstract]:By using rank sum ratio (RSR) comprehensive evaluation of (RSR), mathematical statistics and video observation, the quantitative analysis of 12 teams in the men's basketball competition of the 31st Summer Olympic Games was carried out. The technical statistics of 6 teams in Group A (China team) are analyzed and compared. The results show that the average height of the Chinese team is the highest, reaching 203.83 cm, and the average age is 23.42 years old. In the Chinese team, Yi Jianlian's appearance time reached 30 minutes, playing in the mainstay of the Chinese team; Guo Allen and Zhou Peng each played more than 25 minutes, playing a central role in the entire team. Ding Yanyu and other six players played more than 15 minutes per game, which was an important part of the Chinese team, while Sui ran and Li Muhao played less than 10 minutes and were on the edge of the team. Offensive RSR: a rating of the United States; B rating of Australia and other five teams; C rating of Argentina and other three teams, including the Chinese team. Defense in RSR: a rating of the United States, B, Spain and other three teams, including Australia, including five teams; the Chinese team rated D. Analysis on the RSR of attack and Defense there is still only one American team in Grade A and four teams in Grade B, including Spain, and Grade C, including Brazil, and the Chinese team is rated D. In the group match attack data comparison analysis: the total score aspect and the Chinese team presents the very significant difference has the American team and so on 3 teams. In terms of 2-point shots, the United States and Serbia differ significantly from the Chinese team in the number of hits. In the aspect of 3-point shooting, there are very significant differences between USA and China in 3-point shots, and there are very significant differences between USA and USA in shooting. There is a significant difference between the Chinese team and the United States and France in the shooting rate. In terms of the number of free throws, there is a significant difference between China and Serbia and France in the percentage of free-throw hits, but there is no difference between China and other teams. In offensive rebounds, the Chinese team and the United States presented a very significant difference. In terms of fast break score, the difference between Chinese team and American team is 12.68 points, showing significant difference, and there is no difference with other teams. In terms of errors, the Chinese team averaged 17.80 games, showing a very significant difference with the United States and no difference with Serbia. In the comparison and analysis of the defensive data of the opponents in the group stage: in the defensive rebounds, the average defensive rebounds of the US team were 29.38, which was very significant difference with the Chinese team, while the Serbia team averaged 25.13 defensive rebounds per game. There were significant differences between French team and Chinese team, 27.33 between French team and Chinese team, 26.13 between Australia team and Chinese team, and there was significant difference between Australia team and Chinese team. There is no difference between Venezuela and China. In terms of fouls, China has the most fouls per game, showing significant differences with France. There is no difference between Chinese team and group-stage opponents in steals, blocks and error scores. It is suggested that: (1) increase the chance of the Chinese team playing against the strong teams in the world (.2) optimize the Chinese team's lineup allocation (.3) strengthen the shooting ability, especially the 3-point ball (.4) strengthen the physical confrontation, strengthen the physical reserve in the game, and increase the ability to move. Avoid "single fight" 6. 6) actively rush and grab, clamp, the whole team rebounds.
【学位授予单位】：山西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G841
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 左伟;;从第28届亚锦赛看亚洲篮球格局和中国男篮现状[J];西安体育学院学报;2016年04期
2 谢叶寿;陈钧;;第28届男篮亚锦赛中国队攻防能力分析[J];北京体育大学学报;2016年03期
3 朱焱;周殿学;;2014-2015赛季中国男子篮球职业联赛季后赛各参赛球队攻、防能力比较研究[J];中国体育科技;2016年01期
4 关克;侯向锋;;2014-2015赛季CBA常规赛各参赛队攻防能力比较[J];体育科技文献通报;2016年01期
5 赵晋;;2014—2015赛季中国女子篮球联赛前4名球队攻、防指标的TOPSIS分析[J];中国体育科技;2015年05期
6 侯向锋;赵晋;景小俨;;2014篮球世界杯前8名球队的攻防能力分析[J];中国体育科技;2015年03期
7 耿建华;王建刚;;2013-2014赛季CBA联赛各参赛球队攻防竞技实力的比较研究[J];中国体育科技;2015年01期
8 侯向锋;光晖;李鑫;;第27届亚洲男子篮球锦标赛中国队与对手攻防实力比较[J];上海体育学院学报;2014年02期
9 颜海波;唐峭峻;;从第30届奥运会探究中国男篮现状与差距[J];南京体育学院学报(社会科学版);2014年01期
10 颜永涛;;第26届亚锦赛中国男篮与对手攻防能力比较研究[J];南京体育学院学报(自然科学版);2014年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 程宏森;第27届男篮亚锦赛中国队失利原因分析[D];北京体育大学;2015年
2 胡建会;第27届亚锦赛中国男篮攻防能力的分析研究[D];西安体育学院;2014年
3 朱鑫;第27届男篮亚锦赛中国队及对手攻防技术统计比较研究[D];西安体育学院;2014年
4 魏斌;第30届奥运会中国男篮防守技战术运用研究[D];成都体育学院;2013年
5 裴原浩;第30届奥运会中国男篮攻防能力的分析与研究[D];成都体育学院;2013年
6 乔明波;第16届男篮世锦赛中国队与前八强统计数据比较研究[D];成都体育学院;2012年
7 张彦;对第26届男篮亚锦赛中、外内线队员进攻能力的比较分析[D];山西大学;2012年
8 王松;第26届篮球亚锦赛中外男篮组织后卫队员攻防能力的比较研究[D];河南大学;2012年
9 张辉;第26届男篮亚锦赛中国队运用防守战术状况分析[D];河南大学;2012年
10 闫晋;对第16届世锦赛中国男篮主要竞争对手进攻主要技战术特点的研究[D];北京体育大学;2011年
，本文编号：2236579
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/2236579.html
