SCBA与NCAA篮球联赛运行机制比较研究

发布时间：2018-09-12 18:39

【摘要】：随着我国体育事业的发展,各体育院校作为我国竞技体育的重要组成以及学校体育发展的重点——全国体育院校的竞技水平却在这个发展的大洪流中略显滞后,多数的体育院校经济水平停止不前,甚至在一定情况下还有退步。这些体育院校不仅面临着生源质量、数量的下滑,并且在校生也由于相关竞赛制度的限制,陷入了无大赛可打的尴尬局面。参加比赛少,只参加由全国体院竞赛协作会组织的四年一届的全国体育院校篮球锦标赛。2014年,国务院印发了《关于加快发展体育产业促进体育消费的若干意见》,对于此项工作国家体育总局高度重视,为此提出了打造“一校一品牌,一校一赛事”的全国体育院校篮球联赛的竞赛新模式,旨在尝试体育院校赛事市场化运作改革,加强后备人才的培养。国家体育总局科教司司长蒋志学在2015年6月5日的《全国体育院校篮球联赛筹备会议》中指出:“我国已经提出了建设体育强国的目标。新时期发展体育产业,“振兴三大球”已经上升至国家战略层面。在体育深化改革,科学谋划,市场化运作的新形式下,作为培养专业体育人才的全国各大体育学院,应当创立自己的联赛,并将它打造成为一个品牌。建立此项赛事也是贯彻落实国家体育总局提出的“一校一品牌,一校一赛事”的工作部署,并希望以此为契机,真正意义上打造出全国体育院校竞赛新模式,从而扩大体育院校的社会影响力,打造有价值,有影响力的平台”。他还指出,“建立全国体育院校篮球联盟仅仅是一个开始,也是一个标杆,我们要打响“第一炮”,为将来的排球联赛、足球联赛开好头,铺好路”。因此如何在现有资源基础上,建立与完善SCBA的运行机制,尤为重要。美国的NCAA经过一百多年的不断发展,发展成为全球最成功的体育赛事之一,其高效的赛事运行机制是促进NCAA良好发展的基础。同样作为大学生联赛,SCBA与NCAA在管理机制、经营模式等方面有着许多的相似之处,但SCBA与NCAA相比差距明显,SCBA在管理机制、赛事机制、经营模式机制等方面存在着许多制约发展的因素。通过对SCBA和NCAA运行机制的对比,可以为SCBA篮球联赛整体水平的提升提供经验借鉴。本文通过文献资料、专家访谈、实地考察法、对比分析法,综合国内外学者针对此问题或相关问题的研究,有针对性的提出SCBA运行机制存在的问题,并针对这些问题提出针对性的建议。本文通过研究得出以下结论:1.竞赛组织机构:在运行过程中明确分化各委员会的责任和职权,早日实现权管分离;完善规章制度;申请运动员等级审批,成立运动员等级审批委员会。2.竞赛制度方面:邀请更多的院校参与到SCBA中来,对联赛实行等级划分;实行新的比赛赛制;对基层比赛进行推广,展开丰富多样的比赛活动。3.运营方式:构建科学合理的人员培训体系;建立SCBA人才数据库;完善运作方式,拓宽经济来源。
[Abstract]:With the development of sports in our country, as an important component of competitive sports in our country and the key point of the development of school sports, the competitive level of the national sports colleges and universities lags behind in the great current of development. The economic level of most sports colleges and universities has stopped, and even retreated under certain circumstances. These physical education colleges not only face the decline of the quality and quantity of students, but also fall into the awkward situation of no contest due to the restriction of relevant competition system. Participate in fewer competitions, only participate in the National Sports Academy Competition Cooperation Association organized by the four-year National Sports Academy Basketball Championships. 2014, The State Council has issued several opinions on speeding up the Development of Sports Industry and promoting Sports consumption. The State Administration of Sports attaches great importance to this work and has therefore proposed to build a "one school, one brand". The new competition mode of the National Basketball League of Colleges and Universities is aimed at trying to reform the market-oriented operation of sports events in colleges and universities and strengthening the training of reserve talents. Jiang Zhixue, director of the Department of Science and Education of the State Sports Administration, pointed out in the "National Basketball League Preparatory meeting of Sports Colleges" on June 5, 2015: "China has put forward the goal of building a strong sports country." The development of sports industry in the new period, "vitalizing the three big balls" has risen to the level of national strategy. In the new form of sports reform, scientific planning and market-oriented operation, each major sports college in China, as a professional sports talent, should establish its own league and turn it into a brand. The establishment of this competition is also to carry out the work plan of "one school, one brand, one school and one event" proposed by the State Sports Administration, and hope to take this as an opportunity to truly create a new national sports academy competition model. In order to expand the social influence of physical education institutions, to create a valuable, influential platform. He also pointed out that "the establishment of the National Sports Academy Basketball League is only a start and a benchmark. We should start the first shot and make a good start and pave the way for the future volleyball league and football league." Therefore, it is very important to establish and perfect the operating mechanism of SCBA on the basis of existing resources. The United States NCAA has developed into one of the most successful sports events in the world after more than one hundred years of continuous development. Its efficient running mechanism is the foundation to promote the good development of NCAA. There are many similarities between SCBA and NCAA in management mechanism, management mode and so on, but the gap between SCBA and NCAA is obvious. There are many factors restricting the development of business model. Through the comparison of SCBA and NCAA, we can provide experience for the improvement of the whole level of SCBA basketball league. Based on the literature, experts interview, field investigation, comparative analysis, this paper synthesizes the domestic and foreign scholars' research on this or related problems, and puts forward the problems of SCBA operation mechanism. And to these problems put forward targeted recommendations. This paper draws the following conclusion: 1. Competition organization: in the process of operation clearly divided the responsibilities and powers of the various committees, realize the separation of authority and management at an early date; perfect the rules and regulations; apply for athletes' grade examination and approval, set up the athletes' grade examination and approval committee. Competition system: invite more colleges and universities to participate in the SCBA, to implement the division of the league; to implement the new competition system; to promote the grass-roots competition, to launch a rich variety of competition activities. 3. Operation mode: construct scientific and reasonable personnel training system; establish SCBA talent database; perfect operation mode and broaden economic source.
【学位授予单位】：山东体育学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G841

【参考文献】