女子两面反胶与不同性能球拍进攻打法乒乓球选手技战术对比分析
发布时间：2018-11-11 20:05
【摘要】：本文以当今世界优秀女子两面反胶进攻打法选手与不同性能球拍进攻打法选手丁宁、朱雨玲、福原爱、木子为研究对象,运用观察统计法与对比分析法,对32场共172局比赛的技战术使用情况进行统计分析。通过对两种不同打法运动员之间技战术得失分特征的比较分析,得到以下结论:1、两种不同打法选手三段使用率没有明显差别,两面反胶选手发抢段与相持段得分率较高,不同性能球拍选手接抢段得分率较高。不同性能球拍选手上手使用率明显高于两面反胶选手,尤其在接发球轮,但得分率低于两面反胶选手。两种不同打法选手均以反手上手为主,正手及侧身上手为辅。2、在发球时,两种不同打法选手都以发近网短球为主,其次两面反胶选手较多使用半出台球,不同性能球拍选手更多配合底线长球的使用。第三板技战术运用中,两种不同打法选手进攻技术使用率均为最高,不同性能球拍选手进攻使用率、失分率都高于两面反胶选手,尤其是反手攻(弹)技术。不同性能球拍选手第三板进攻落点大多为对手反手位,两面反胶选手回球落点变化较多。3、在接发球技战术的运用上,两面反胶选手控制类技术使用率高,劈长是其主要得分手段。不同性能球拍选手进攻技术使用率最高,其主要使用与得分技术为反手攻(弹)。两面反胶选手在接中路短球时较多使用正手摆短或劈长,不同性能球拍选手更多依赖使用反手颗粒胶进行弹击从而掌握进攻的主动。第四板技战术运用时,两面反胶选手防守类技术使用率与失分率偏高,不同性能球拍选手进攻类技术使用率与失分率较高。在二、四板技战术组合中,两面反胶选手控防组合使用率最高且失分率高,不同性能球拍选手多采用连续攻技术组合,以反手连续攻的使用率最高。4、两种不同打法选手相持段最后一板使用反手比例均为最高,尤其是连续反手组合,两面反胶选手相持段最后一板反手使用效果优于不同性能球拍选手。两种不同打法选手在相持段都注重回球落点的变化,增加对手跑动范围。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the author takes the excellent women's double-sided backgel-attacking players in the world and the racket players with different performances as research objects, such as Ding Ning, Zhu Yuling, Fukuhara Ai, and Muzi, and applies the method of observation and statistics and comparative analysis. Statistical analysis was made on the technical and tactical use of 172 innings in 32 games. Based on the comparative analysis of the characteristics of technical and tactical gains and losses between the two types of players, the following conclusions are drawn: 1. There is no significant difference in the utilization rate of the three segments between the two different playing methods, and the scoring rate of the two backgels is higher than that of the other. Racket rackets with different performances have a higher scoring rate. The utilization rate of racket players with different performances was significantly higher than that of two backgels, especially on the receiving wheel, but the scoring rate was lower than that of the two backgels. Two different types of players are mainly backhand players, forehand and sideways upper hand as auxiliary. 2. When serving, the two different types of players play mainly in short netting, and in the second two sides of the reverse rubber players use half out billiards more often. Racket players with different performances are more likely to cooperate with the use of the baseline long ball. In the use of the third board technique and tactics, the utilization rate of attack techniques of the two different types of players is the highest, and the attack rate and the loss rate of the racket players with different performances are all higher than those of the two sides of the backhand attack (bomb) technique. The third board attack point of racquet players with different performances is mostly the backhand position of the opponent, and the backhand position of the backers on both sides of the racket is more varied. 3. In the application of the receiving and serving techniques and tactics, the control techniques of the two backgels players have a high utilization rate. Split length is its main means of scoring. Different performance racket player attack technique utilization rate is the highest, its main use and the score technique is backhand attack (bomb). The forehand short or long forehand is more used by the backhand racket players, and the racket players with different performances rely more on the backhand particle glue to grasp the initiative of attack. In the use of the fourth board technique and tactics, the utilization rate and the loss rate of defensive techniques were higher than those of the players with different performances, and the utilization rate and the loss rate of offensive techniques were higher than those of the players with different performances. In the second and fourth board technical and tactical combinations, the two sides of the anti-rubber players had the highest utilization rate of the control and defense combinations and the high loss rate. The racket players with different performances mostly used the combination of continuous attack techniques, and the highest utilization rate was the backhand continuous attack. 4. The proportion of backhand used in the last board of the two different playing methods is the highest, especially the backhand combination. The result of using the last backhand in the holding section is better than that in the racket with different performances. Two different types of players in each other focus on the change of the ball landing point, increase the range of the opponent running.
【学位授予单位】：北京体育大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G846
[Abstract]:In this paper, the author takes the excellent women's double-sided backgel-attacking players in the world and the racket players with different performances as research objects, such as Ding Ning, Zhu Yuling, Fukuhara Ai, and Muzi, and applies the method of observation and statistics and comparative analysis. Statistical analysis was made on the technical and tactical use of 172 innings in 32 games. Based on the comparative analysis of the characteristics of technical and tactical gains and losses between the two types of players, the following conclusions are drawn: 1. There is no significant difference in the utilization rate of the three segments between the two different playing methods, and the scoring rate of the two backgels is higher than that of the other. Racket rackets with different performances have a higher scoring rate. The utilization rate of racket players with different performances was significantly higher than that of two backgels, especially on the receiving wheel, but the scoring rate was lower than that of the two backgels. Two different types of players are mainly backhand players, forehand and sideways upper hand as auxiliary. 2. When serving, the two different types of players play mainly in short netting, and in the second two sides of the reverse rubber players use half out billiards more often. Racket players with different performances are more likely to cooperate with the use of the baseline long ball. In the use of the third board technique and tactics, the utilization rate of attack techniques of the two different types of players is the highest, and the attack rate and the loss rate of the racket players with different performances are all higher than those of the two sides of the backhand attack (bomb) technique. The third board attack point of racquet players with different performances is mostly the backhand position of the opponent, and the backhand position of the backers on both sides of the racket is more varied. 3. In the application of the receiving and serving techniques and tactics, the control techniques of the two backgels players have a high utilization rate. Split length is its main means of scoring. Different performance racket player attack technique utilization rate is the highest, its main use and the score technique is backhand attack (bomb). The forehand short or long forehand is more used by the backhand racket players, and the racket players with different performances rely more on the backhand particle glue to grasp the initiative of attack. In the use of the fourth board technique and tactics, the utilization rate and the loss rate of defensive techniques were higher than those of the players with different performances, and the utilization rate and the loss rate of offensive techniques were higher than those of the players with different performances. In the second and fourth board technical and tactical combinations, the two sides of the anti-rubber players had the highest utilization rate of the control and defense combinations and the high loss rate. The racket players with different performances mostly used the combination of continuous attack techniques, and the highest utilization rate was the backhand continuous attack. 4. The proportion of backhand used in the last board of the two different playing methods is the highest, especially the backhand combination. The result of using the last backhand in the holding section is better than that in the racket with different performances. Two different types of players in each other focus on the change of the ball landing point, increase the range of the opponent running.
【学位授予单位】：北京体育大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G846
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 米多多;;百款反胶体重手册[J];乒乓世界;2007年03期
2 李克非;;反胶新生代12款反胶横向评测[J];乒乓世界;2007年04期
3 闲云;赵晖;;“黏”字诀 729“天骄”系列反胶纵向测评[J];乒乓世界;2007年05期
4 黄振寰;喻江云;;反胶水[J];聪明泉(少儿版);2012年01期
5 孙岚云,毕玉增;论反胶硬质海绵球拍的优越性[J];山东工程学院学报;1995年02期
6 李洪钟;阮国璧;;论反胶海绵拍的先进性[J];中国体育科技;1982年23期
7 王吉生;弧圈球与反胶球拍[J];乒乓世界;2002年01期
8 ;男子削球:渐进[J];乒乓世界;2003年10期
9 辛京华;重新书写球史的旋转球王——伊藤繁雄[J];乒乓世界;2003年05期
10 王涛;放不下的球拍(二)[J];新体育;1997年11期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 记者张彤薇;环保型乒乓球拍在天津“现身”[N];中国技术市场报;2011年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 刘杨;新型亲和反胶团系统及其蛋白质萃取特性研究[D];天津大学;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 叶梦R，
本文编号：2325985
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/2325985.html
