当前位置:主页 > 教育论文 > 体育论文 >

学校体育场馆对外开放委托管理研究

发布时间:2018-12-20 12:51
【摘要】:当前我国群众健身场地匮乏,而现有的多数体育场馆却处于闲置或对外开放不足的状态,一定程度上影响了群众健身的热情和全民健身工程的推行。据第六次全国体育场地普查结果显示,我国教育系统体育场地所占比例较大,充分利用学校体育场地资源成为解决场地匮乏之重要途径。国家体育总局和教育部于2006年联合启动学校体育场馆对外开放试点工作,经过多年的努力,学校体育场馆对外开放一定程度上缓解了全民健身场地不足的压力。本文以“委托管理”模式为视角,采用文献资料法、专家访谈法、实地考察法等方法对学校体育场馆委托管理进行研究,了解学校体育场馆对外开放的现状,分析其存在的问题,并对已实行较为成功的“无锡模式”、“桃浦模式”、“慈溪模式”等案例进行分析,从而总结其成功经验和借鉴意义。本文主要研究结果表明:1)我国教育系统的体育场地资源丰富,但学校体育场馆对外开放率较低,主要制约因素有安全、经费、管理等。在体育场馆对外开放的学校中,实施自主经营模式较多,委托管理模式相对较少。2)学校体育场馆实施第三方委托管理具有以下积极意义:有效的盘活学校体育场馆资源;丰富公共体育服务的内容;规避学校风险,消除学校后顾之忧;提高学专业化管理水平;促进青少年体育的发展。3)学校体育场馆对外开放委托管理在我国推广过程中可能存在以下困境:政府的支持力度不够;学校体育场馆硬件条件较差;专业第三方管理机构较为缺乏。针对学校体育场馆对外开放委托管理可能出现的问题提出相关建议,学校体育场馆对外开放实施委托管理,政府应该大力支持此举措,不断提高对外开放率,积极培育第三方专业管理机构,使其承接对外开放工作,同时对学校加大投入,依托学校体育场馆建设区域性健身中心,推广“无锡模式” “慈溪模式”等成功经验,并不断完善风险转移机制,规避学校体育场馆对外开放风险等举措。以期为学校体育场馆对外开放的长效机制提供理论参考。
[Abstract]:At present, the mass fitness venues in our country are scarce, but most of the existing sports venues are idle or open to the outside world, which to a certain extent affects the enthusiasm of the masses' fitness and the implementation of the national fitness project. According to the results of the sixth National Sports Field Survey, the proportion of sports venues in China's educational system is large, and making full use of the resources of school sports venues is an important way to solve the shortage of sports venues. In 2006, the State General Administration of Sports and the Ministry of Education jointly launched the pilot work of opening school sports venues to the outside world. After years of efforts, the opening of school sports venues to a certain extent alleviated the pressure of the shortage of fitness venues for the whole people. From the perspective of "entrustment management", this paper studies the entrustment management of school stadiums and gymnasiums by using the methods of literature, expert interview and field investigation, so as to understand the present situation of the opening up of school stadiums and gymnasiums. The existing problems are analyzed, and the successful cases such as "Wuxi Model", "Taopu Model" and "Cixi Model" are analyzed, so as to sum up its successful experience and reference significance. The main results of this paper are as follows: 1) the educational system of our country is rich in the resources of sports venues, but the opening rate of school sports venues is low, the main restrictive factors are safety, funds, management and so on. In the schools open to the outside world, there are more independent management models and less entrusted management models. 2) the implementation of third-party entrustment management of school stadiums and gymnasiums has the following positive significance: effective revitalization of school sports stadiums and gymnasiums resources; Enrich the content of public sports service, avoid school risk, eliminate the worries of school, improve the level of professional management; Promoting the development of adolescent sports. 3) there may be some difficulties in the process of promoting the entrustment management of school sports venues opening to the outside world in our country: the government support is not enough, the hardware condition of school sports stadiums is poor; Professional third-party management agencies are relatively lacking. In view of the problems that may arise in the entrusted management of the opening of school sports venues to the outside world, the government should vigorously support this initiative and continuously raise the rate of opening up to the outside world. Actively cultivate third party professional management institutions to undertake the work of opening to the outside world, at the same time increase investment in schools, build regional fitness centers based on school stadiums and gymnasiums, promote successful experiences such as "Wuxi model" and "Cixi model", etc. And constantly improve the risk transfer mechanism, avoid the risk of opening school sports venues and other measures. In order to provide a theoretical reference for the long-term mechanism of opening-up of school stadiums and gymnasiums.
【学位授予单位】:华中师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G818

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 陈元欣;王华燕;张强;;“营改增”对体育场馆运营的影响研究[J];体育文化导刊;2016年02期

2 林建君;Teo Ee-Chon;;中日学校体育场馆设施开放利用分析及启示[J];宁波大学学报(人文科学版);2015年03期

3 王健;陈元欣;;我国学校体育场地设施现状、制约因素与发展对策[J];上海体育学院学报;2015年02期

4 方东胜;陆亨伯;章昱涵;陈旭辉;;学校体育场馆开放的“慈溪模式”研究[J];体育文化导刊;2014年07期

5 贾洪洲;;学校体育场馆可持续开放的困境与对策研究[J];体育文化导刊;2014年05期

6 于晓光;曹继红;;日本大众体育设施的“政府促进”之研究[J];运动;2013年19期

7 陈广旭;张承毅;;公共服务视角下我国学校体育场馆对外开放的障碍及优化策略[J];沈阳体育学院学报;2013年01期

8 王哲;梁红霞;舒盛芳;;上海市试点中小学体育场馆对外开放现状[J];菏泽学院学报;2011年05期

9 谢进;顾秀萍;;学校场馆对社会开放的情况与对策研究——以无锡市学校体育场馆为例[J];南京体育学院学报(自然科学版);2011年04期

10 刘晶;陈元欣;;高校体育场馆供给现状、特点及其发展趋势[J];武汉体育学院学报;2010年10期



本文编号:2388023

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/2388023.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户60ab8***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com