2016年奥运会男篮四强队伍进攻战术特征的研究
[Abstract]:Rio 2016 men's basketball competition, each team in the field played their own level and characteristics, while at the same time to bring visual feast for the audience. This paper, by watching the video of the Rio Olympic team participating in all the competitions, adopts the methods of documentary material, video observation, expert interview, mathematical statistics, and so on. By means of logic analysis and other methods, the statistical analysis of the offensive tactics of the top four teams is carried out in order to find out the tactical characteristics of each team and draw the following conclusions: 1. In the fast attack the offensive route is obvious, the top four teams advance routes are mainly in the middle. More prone to shorter paths, faster speed, more responders for the characteristics of the completion of the attack. Among them, the United States team has the highest success rate, mainly with personal ability and 3 points to end the attack. Serbia team and Spain team in fast break in the number of people, the team to turn fast down faster. The main means of scoring in Australia's fast break is to break through or coordinate with the basket. 2. On the offensive tactics of the cohesive section, the tactics of the top four teams show different characteristics. According to the situation at that time, each team randomly selected their own local cooperation. Among them, the top four teams scored mainly through three-point goal and breakthrough shot-up, in which the three-point selection ratio of the United States team was higher than that of the breakthrough shot-up ratio. On the side of relying on cooperation to attack, the United States mainly rely on breakthrough scoring, Serbia more rely on the cooperation between two or three to find opportunities, mainly to cover, cross-cutting and sudden division of the offensive co-operation. Spain's characteristics mainly rely on cut-in, its center can actively follow up and participate in it. Australia is dominated by cover and break points. 3. In terms of the characteristics of the overall offensive tactics, the United States adopts 1-2-1 attack formation, Serbia takes 1-4 position, and Spain and Australia adopt 1-3-1 attack formation. The United States made more use of the team's excellent projection ability to develop three-point tactics, which are simple and efficient. Serbia's small-scale and delicate offensive coordination is its characteristics, Spain in the attack mainly around center Gasol, using the center's response and cover, as well as the movement of the players to find the opportunity to score. Australia has no ball to run more, through high-quality cover to form misplaced defense for a large number of small. Base attack coordination in the position attack, the most frequently used is the Serbian team, 106.8 times per game, followed by Spain, Australia team, the United States team is the least number of use, the game is 45.4 times 4. In the position attack of the world's high level men's basketball team, the player's physical quality, personal ability and coach's style decide their team's playing style and change, the attack characteristic generally manifests as using the local cooperation to complete the attack, paying attention to the simplicity and high efficiency. In the fast break aspect, the scoring way is more and more abundant, to the 3-point goal and the cooperation baskets primarily. The score and use of the stage attack in the game are relatively few, and each team also needs to study its offensive tactics in order to better use it in the game, so as to enhance their offensive ability.
【学位授予单位】:北京体育大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G841
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王立民;;篮球复合式进攻战术法探析[J];惠州学院学报(自然科学版);2008年03期
2 黄辅周;;排球进攻战术[J];上海体育学院学报;1959年01期
3 宋太日;李忠山;;国际式摔跤进攻战术的运用[J];哈尔滨体育学院学报;1983年S1期
4 何伟,何蕊;排球集体进攻战术设计的原则与范例[J];山东体育科技;1999年02期
5 郑尚武,向渝;对篮球“移动配合”进攻战术的初步研究[J];成都体育学院学报;2001年06期
6 吴平;当今世界男排强队进攻战术的特点及发展态势[J];上海体育学院学报;2001年01期
7 粟晓红,赵厚华;足球角球进攻战术的对比分析[J];沈阳体育学院学报;2001年03期
8 王桂荣;;排球进攻战术反向二传组攻打法初探[J];哈尔滨体育学院学报;2002年02期
9 曾晓彬;排球二传手进攻战术组织与谋略运用探析[J];武汉体育学院学报;2003年03期
10 颜成春;;篮球综合性进攻战术研究[J];三明学院学报;2006年04期
相关会议论文 前4条
1 闫琪;贾伟;王明波;王忠军;;第29届奥运会女子曲棍球比赛短角球进攻战术特点研究[A];第十三届全国运动生物力学学术交流大会论文汇编[C];2009年
2 周珏;徐漫云;谢秀雯;;影响我国青年女子重剑运动员进攻战术运用的技术因素[A];第十七届全国高校田径科研论文报告会论文专辑[C];2007年
3 林竞;马德云;;决策树技术在足球比赛角球进攻战术研究中的应用[A];第九届全国体育科学大会论文摘要汇编(4)[C];2011年
4 郭荣;;现代排球接应二传手进攻战术运用与打法研究[A];第4届全国青年体育科学学术会议论文摘要汇编[C];2005年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 俞建军 朱永香;信息化条件下进攻战术新方式[N];战士报;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 张超;2013年欧洲男子篮球锦标赛比赛最后一分钟的进攻战术研究[D];浙江师范大学;2015年
2 张梦洋;第十二届全运会女子水球比赛前三名队伍进攻战术分析[D];成都体育学院;2015年
3 虞谦;2013-2014赛季欧洲冠军联赛16强球队进攻战术表现特征[D];北京体育大学;2015年
4 冯婷婷;2014年女篮世锦赛中国队同与赛队进攻战术运用特点的研究[D];北京体育大学;2016年
5 谢名杨;2013-2014赛季欧洲冠军联赛马卡比队阵地进攻战术的研究[D];北京体育大学;2016年
6 宋泓江;2013-2014赛季佛罗里达大学篮球队阵地进攻战术体系研究[D];北京体育大学;2016年
7 闫凯;首届男篮世界杯八强比赛衔接段进玫特征的研究[D];武汉体育学院;2015年
8 康鼎新;足球电竞软件在进攻战术教学中的应用研究[D];成都体育学院;2016年
9 何利民;排球比赛中副攻在前后排进攻战术运用分析[D];陕西师范大学;2016年
10 严瀚;运用synergy指标体系对第31届里约奥运会男篮四强比赛的进攻战术手段的研究[D];首都体育学院;2017年
,本文编号:2435144
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/2435144.html