基于Preker-Harding模型的大型公共体育场馆事业单位体制改革模式评价
发布时间：2019-06-09 19:06
【摘要】：采用典型案例调查法、专家访谈法,借鉴Preker-Harding模型理论对我国大型公共体育场馆事业单位管理体制改革模式进行评价。结果显示,我国事业单位场馆管理体制改革模式可总结为体制内部改革模式、事业单位企业化管理改革模式、企事业并轨改革模式、BCO改革模式、"事转企"改革模式、事业单位委托管理模式6种。结合Preker-Harding模型设计了评价的8个纬度。分析认为,体制内部改革模式、事业单位企业化管理改革模式属于事业单位自主化运营模式,企事业并轨改革模式、BCO改革模式属于管理机构法人化模式,"事转企"改革模式属于企业法人模式,事业单位委托管理模式属于委托法人化模式。4种模式在政府作为所有者和监管者方面的职能不同,未来我国事业场馆改革目标和思路是分类改革,改革方向的近期目标是采用事业单位企业化管理模式,中期发展目标是借鉴BCO管理改革模式,长期发展目标是完善委托管理模式。
[Abstract]:The typical case investigation method, expert interview method and Preker-Harding model theory are used to evaluate the management system reform mode of large public stadiums and gymnasiums in China. The results show that the reform mode of venue management system in public institutions in China can be summarized as the internal reform mode, the enterprise management reform mode, the enterprise and enterprise merger reform mode, the BCO reform mode and the "event to enterprise" reform mode. There are six modes of entrustment management in public institutions. Combined with Preker-Harding model, eight latitudes of evaluation are designed. It is considered that the reform mode within the system, the reform mode of enterprise management in public institutions belongs to the mode of independent operation of institutions, the mode of enterprise and enterprise reform, and the mode of BCO reform belongs to the mode of legalization of management institutions. The reform mode of "transforming affairs into enterprises" belongs to the mode of enterprise legal person, and the mode of entrustment management of public institutions belongs to the mode of entrustment legalization. The functions of the four models are different in terms of government as owner and regulator. In the future, the goal and train of thought of the reform of enterprise stadiums and gymnasiums in our country is classified reform, the short-term goal of the reform direction is to adopt the enterprise management mode of public institutions, and the medium-term development goal is to draw lessons from the BCO management reform mode. The long-term development goal is to improve the entrustment management model.
【作者单位】： 山西财经大学体育学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目(15BTY047)
【分类号】：G818
[Abstract]:The typical case investigation method, expert interview method and Preker-Harding model theory are used to evaluate the management system reform mode of large public stadiums and gymnasiums in China. The results show that the reform mode of venue management system in public institutions in China can be summarized as the internal reform mode, the enterprise management reform mode, the enterprise and enterprise merger reform mode, the BCO reform mode and the "event to enterprise" reform mode. There are six modes of entrustment management in public institutions. Combined with Preker-Harding model, eight latitudes of evaluation are designed. It is considered that the reform mode within the system, the reform mode of enterprise management in public institutions belongs to the mode of independent operation of institutions, the mode of enterprise and enterprise reform, and the mode of BCO reform belongs to the mode of legalization of management institutions. The reform mode of "transforming affairs into enterprises" belongs to the mode of enterprise legal person, and the mode of entrustment management of public institutions belongs to the mode of entrustment legalization. The functions of the four models are different in terms of government as owner and regulator. In the future, the goal and train of thought of the reform of enterprise stadiums and gymnasiums in our country is classified reform, the short-term goal of the reform direction is to adopt the enterprise management mode of public institutions, and the medium-term development goal is to draw lessons from the BCO management reform mode. The long-term development goal is to improve the entrustment management model.
【作者单位】： 山西财经大学体育学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目(15BTY047)
【分类号】：G818
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李明;我国公共体育场馆的资产性质及其改革[J];天津体育学院学报;2003年02期
2 张岩;我国公共体育场馆性质辨析[J];体育与科学;2004年02期
3 钱伟良,陈斌;浙江省公共体育场馆经营管理现状与对策[J];安徽体育科技;2004年03期
4 郭惠平;公共体育场馆经营管理问题的诊断及对策[J];体育科技文献通报;2005年12期
5 谢萍萍;陆亨伯;;公共体育场馆的高成本运作及其民营化改革[J];广州体育学院学报;2005年06期
6 谢萍萍;陆亨伯;;公共体育场馆的高成本运作及其民营化改革[J];体育科技文献通报;2006年04期
7 李梁华;;对我国公共体育场馆经营现状与对策的研究[J];企业经济;2006年04期
8 刘丽萍;赵世昌;;论公共体育场馆的经营管理[J];体育世界;2006年12期
9 徐文强;陈元欣;张洪武;王健;;我国公共体育场馆经营现状及管理体制改革研究[J];成都体育学院学报;2007年03期
10 陆亨伯;陆方U，
本文编号：2495816
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/2495816.html
