中国MOOCs教学模式调查研究

  本文关键词：学习理论与远程教育成本-效益实现路径研究，由笔耕文化传播整理发布。

中国MOOCs教学模式调查研究

详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | 收藏本文| 获取CNKI官网全文

摘要

自2012年兴起至今,中国MOOCs实践吸引了大量机构和高校投身其中,已经积累了一定数量的课程,这些现有课程的基本现状究竟如何?尤其是其教学模式是否能够真正促进在线教育的变革?本研究为解决这一问题,对国内14个MOOCs平台1388门课程进行全样本分析,选取了其中可以获得全部课程信息的12个平台的622门课程,从课程设计中的学习理论、视频组织形式、视频数量和时长以及学习支持服务的种类、数量和线上讨论等维度对中国现有MOOCs教学模式进行了分析。研究发现,基于行为主义学习理论x MOOCs依旧是当前国内MOOCs的主导课程模式,而作为课程核心的教学视频亟需更加贴近学习者;现有MOOCs学习支持服务的形式多样,但力度相对薄弱。教师参与是MOOCs整体交互水平提升的关键,但目前教师参与程度远远不足。MOOCs下一步的发展可能需要更多地反思和重构基本教学模式,需要在课程设计和技术应用上体现先进性和灵活性,提供更加常态化和社会化的学习支持服务。
The practice of MOOCs has attracted lots of institutions and universities in China since 2012. Plenty of courses was accumulated because of it. The survey was wonder how these courses were and especially if the teaching model of them could promote the online educational reform. 622 available courses in 12 platforms was chosen form all1338 courses in 14 MOOCs platforms. They were analyzed from course design and learning support service in their learning theory foundation,video number and length,type and number of learning support service,and online discussion. The survey found that,x MOOCs based on behaviorism were still the mainstream in MOOCs. Teaching videos were the core of MOOCs and they needed to be more suitable for leaners. Learning support service in MOOCs was diversiform but weak. Teachers' participation was a key factor to enhance the interaction of MOOCs while it was lacking now. So,more thinking and reconstitution about the teaching model,advanced and flexible course design and technology application,more stable and socialize learning support service were needed for the further development of MOOCs in China.

引文

[1]Bates,T.(2012).What's Right and What's Wrong about Coursera-Style MOOCs?[DB/OL].[2012-09-20].
    [2]陈丽(2005).远程教育中学习指导书的写作方法[J].中国远程教育,(5):24-26.
    [3]陈丽,林世员(2014).MOOCs“飓风”现象的冷思考[J].现代远距离教育,(3):3-7.
    [4]de Waard,I.,Koutropoulos,A.,Keskin,N.,Abajian,S.C.,Hogue,R.,Rodriguez,O.,&Gallagher,M.S.(2011).Exploring the MOOC format as a pedagogical approach for m Learning[J].Proceedings from m Learn.
    [5]Fem Tech Net News(2013).DOCC 2013:Dialogues on feminism and technology[EB/OL].[2014-4-17].
    [6]Fox,A.,&Patterson,D.(2013).Software engineering curriculum technology transfer[J].
    [7]Guo.P.J.,Kim.J.,&Rubin.R.(2014).How video production affects student engagement:An empirical study of mooc videos[C].In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@scale conference.ACM.ATLANTA,GA,USA..41-50.
    [8]郭文革,陈丽,陈庚(2013).互联网基因与新旧网络教育——从MOOC谈起[J].北京大学教育评论,(4):173-184.
    [9]黄茜(2015).促进课程论坛交互策略的研究——基于三种存在理论[J].远程教育杂志,(5):97-106.
    [10]Holmberg,B.(2005).Theory and practice of distance education.Routledge:7-8.
    [11]李秋菊,王志军,陈丽(2014).x MOOCs中的教学视频设计要点:基于案例的视频分析研究.远程教育杂志,32(6):95-102
    [12]梁林梅(2015).MOOCs学习者:分类,特征与坚持[J].比较教育研究,(1):5.
    [13]玛丽·索普(2014).在线交互:论坛使用策略的重要性[J].中国远程教育,(13):15-23.
    [14]任友群(2013).教师培训如何与MOOCs牵手[N].中国教育报,2013-11-4:(5).
    [15]Rivard,R.(2013).Measuring the MOOC dropout rate[J].Inside Higher Ed,(8). Library/ARCHIVES/GENERAL/GENPRESS/I130308R.pdf
    [16]王一兵,洪芳(2014).开放,灵活,终身,全纳:当代高等教育演变和改革的大趋势——王一兵教授专访[J].苏州大学学报:教育科学版,2(2):66-71.
    [17]约翰·巴格利(2014).反思MOOC热潮[J].开放教育研究,(1):9-17.
    [18]杨素娟,莫冬敏.(2010).网络教育课程论坛教学性存在的个案研究[J].中国电化教育,(12):39-45.
    [19]郑勤华(2014).学习理论与远程教育成本-效益实现路径研究[J].开放教育研究,20(5):29-37.
    [20]祝智庭,闫寒冰,魏非(2013).观照MOOCs的开放教育正能量[J].开放教育研究,19(6):18-27.
    1部分平台并未标注课程开设轮次,则统一按首轮开设编码。

  本文关键词：学习理论与远程教育成本-效益实现路径研究，由笔耕文化传播整理发布。