汉化版情商问卷在大学生中应用的信效度评价

发布时间：2019-04-28 18:16

【摘要】：目的评价汉化版情商问卷在大学生中使用的信度和效度,为情商研究提供有效的测量工具。方法采用汉化版情商问卷及Young网络成瘾量表,对选修北京某医科大学《生活技能教育与心理健康促进》课程和河北某理工科大学《健康与发展》课程的大学生共556名进行问卷调查。采用Cronbach'sα系数法、相关分析和因子分析评价量表的信度和结构效度,用Young网络成瘾诊断量表评价区分效度。结果汉化版情商问卷的Cronbach'sα系数为0.887。各条目与总量表得分间相关系数在0.19～0.72间(P值均0.01)。探索性因子分析提取了9个因子(累计解释方差为50.78%),仅有个别题目的归属与情商问卷的假设不一致。量表除"快乐"外所有的维度和总分上,有无网瘾者的得分差异均有统计学意义(P值均0.05)。结论中文版情商问卷有较好的信度和区分效度,但是仍然需要扩大样本在将来的研究中更深入地验证并改进其结构效度。
[Abstract]:Objective to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of EQ questionnaire in college students, and to provide an effective measurement tool for EQ research. Methods the Chinese version of EQ questionnaire and Young Internet Addiction scale were used. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 556 college students who took the course of "Life skills Education and Mental Health Promotion" in a medical university in Beijing and the course "Health and Development" in a university of science and engineering in Hebei Province. Cronbach's 伪 coefficient method, correlation analysis and factor analysis were used to evaluate the reliability and structural validity of the scale, and the discriminative validity was evaluated by the Young Internet Addiction Diagnostic scale. Results the Cronbach's 伪 coefficient of the Chinese version of EQ questionnaire was 0.887. The correlation coefficient between each item and the total quantity table was 0.19 / 0.72 (P < 0.01). Nine factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis (the cumulative explanatory variance was 50.78%), and only the attribution of individual questions was inconsistent with the hypothesis of EQ questionnaire. There were significant differences in the scores of all the dimensions and total scores except "happiness" among the patients with or without internet addiction (P < 0. 05), and there was no significant difference in the scores between the two groups (P < 0. 05). Conclusion the Chinese EQ questionnaire has good reliability and discriminative validity, but it is still necessary to expand the sample to further verify and improve its structural validity in future studies.
【作者单位】：北京大学公共卫生学院;北京市西城区疾病预防控制中心;河北工业大学理学院;
【分类号】：B844.2

【参考文献】