青少年的道德推脱及其与家庭教养方式的关系

发布时间：2019-05-20 17:37

【摘要】：采用根据班杜拉(1996)改编的问卷测查了832名普通中学生和职校生的道德推脱水平,并探讨了其道德推脱与家庭教养方式的关系。结果显示,在遇到道德相关问题时青少年倾向于不认可进行道德推脱,但随年龄增长其道德推脱水平呈上升趋势(除在初二和初三之间有所下降),尤其在初一和初二、高二、高三之间差异显著;女生的道德推脱水平显著低于男生;尽管学校类型的主效应不显著,但普通高一男生的道德推脱水平显著低于同龄的职校一年级学生,在进入高二、高三后道德推脱水平明显向职校生趋同;青少年的道德推脱水平与其家庭教养方式显著有关,放任型的教养方式下其道德推脱水平最高,而权威型的教养方式下其道德推脱水平最低。这些结果揭示出当前青少年道德推脱的发展现状,以及不同的学校教育和家庭教养在青少年道德推脱发展中的作用。
[Abstract]:A questionnaire adapted from Bandura (1996) was used to investigate the moral deduction level of 832 middle school students and vocational school students, and the relationship between moral deduction and family rearing patterns was discussed. The results show that when confronted with moral related problems, teenagers tend not to recognize moral inferiority, but with the increase of age, the level of moral inferiority tends to rise (except for the decrease between the second and third grades of junior high school), especially in the first and second years of junior high school and the second year of junior high school. There were significant differences among senior three. The level of moral inferiority of female students is significantly lower than that of male students. Although the main effect of school type is not significant, the moral inference level of ordinary senior one boys is significantly lower than that of the first grade students of the same age, and the moral deduction level tends to the same level of vocational school students after entering the second year of senior high school and the third year of senior high school. The level of moral deduction of adolescents is significantly related to their family rearing styles. Under the laissez-faire style, the level of moral inference is the highest, while the level of moral deduction is the lowest under the authoritative mode of upbringing. These results reveal the present situation of the development of teenagers' moral inferiority and the role of different school education and family upbringing in the development of teenagers' moral inferiority.
【作者单位】：南京师范大学心理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金资助项目CBA080236 国家自然科学基金资助项目31100752 江苏省高校优秀中青年教师和校长境外研修计划资助南京师范大学学前教育学国家重点学科资助
【分类号】：B844.2

【参考文献】