K职业学院基础类课程教学质量评价及提升研究

发布时间：2018-01-28 10:55

本文关键词： 高职基础类课程教学质量评价　出处：《山东大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文从对比国内外高职院校基础类课程教学质量的现状出发,分析了K职业学院基础类课程教学及教学管理方面存在的问题。通过调查K职业学院基础类课程的教学现状,提出了K职业学院基础类课程教学及学生学习上存在的问题,对影响基础类课程教学的因素进行了分析,将现有高职院校教学质量评价指标和基础类课程教学质量评价指标的合理因素融入到新的指标体系之中,克服、弥补其不足之处,并结合基础类课程的自身学科特点,对其教学质量评价指标体系进行了初步构建。在此基础上,对基础类课程教学质量评价体系的内涵及对策等进行了论述和研究,并对指标进行了详尽的解析。对影响基础课教学的关键因素——教师的教学质量,进行了科学合理的评价。运用层次分析法给出了教学质量评价指标体系的各项指标的权重,运用模糊综合评价法对教师的教学质量进行了评价,并对评价结果进行了分析。最后将研究的理论应用在案例上并进行系统的分析,提出了对K职业学院基础类课程教学质量提升的有效措施。讨论了高职基础类课程教学质量评价的内容以及常用的质量管理方法：探讨选择全面质量管理、6σ质量管理等方法的应用问题。本研究的价值在于丰富和发展了高职院校课程评估理论,为基础类课程的教学质量评价及常规管理提供合理适用的实施工具,完善了已有的基础课教学质量评价体系,有利于加强教学管理；为高职基础类课程的教学改革提供一些实证性参考和依据,有助于提高教学质量。评价过程中运用了层次分析法和模糊综合评价方法,根据评价主体的不同设计了不同的评价指标,并赋予了不同的权重,因此就降低了由于评价主体的个人原因所导致的计算值和真实值之间的误差,具有一定的实践意义,同时可以方便、客观地评价教师的教学水平。本研究的创新之处在于构建出既具高职教育课堂教学共性、又体现基础类学科特色的全面性、合理性与可操作性相结合的评价指标体系,并对指标进行了详尽的解析；它既充分利用了高职课堂教学质量评价指标体系的优点,又体现出了教学的规律和特点、教学改革和发展的思路等。本文所研究的评价方法也可用于决策经济和工程生活其他领域的相关问题,具有很强的可行性、可移植性和可扩充性。
[Abstract]:This paper compares the present situation of teaching quality of basic courses in higher vocational colleges at home and abroad. This paper analyzes the problems existing in the teaching and management of the basic courses in K Vocational College, and investigates the present situation of the teaching of the basic courses in the K Vocational College. This paper puts forward the problems existing in the teaching of basic courses and students' study in K Vocational College, and analyzes the factors that affect the teaching of basic courses. The reasonable factors of the evaluation index of teaching quality in higher vocational colleges and the teaching quality evaluation index of basic courses are integrated into the new index system to overcome and make up for its shortcomings. Combined with the characteristics of basic courses, the evaluation index system of teaching quality is preliminarily constructed. This paper discusses and studies the connotation and countermeasures of the teaching quality evaluation system of basic courses, and analyzes the indicators in detail, and analyzes the teaching quality of teachers, which is the key factor affecting the teaching of basic courses. Scientific and reasonable evaluation has been carried out. The weight of each index of the evaluation index system of teaching quality has been given by using analytic hierarchy process and the teaching quality of teachers has been evaluated by the method of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. And the evaluation results were analyzed. Finally, the theory of the study was applied to the case and the system analysis was carried out. This paper puts forward some effective measures to improve the teaching quality of basic courses in K Vocational College, and discusses the contents of teaching quality evaluation of basic courses in higher vocational colleges and the common quality management methods: the selection of total quality management is discussed. Application of 6 蟽 quality management methods. The value of this study is to enrich and develop the theory of curriculum evaluation in higher vocational colleges and to provide reasonable and applicable tools for teaching quality evaluation and routine management of basic courses. Improve the existing basic course teaching quality evaluation system, which is conducive to strengthening teaching management; It provides some practical reference and basis for the teaching reform of basic courses in higher vocational education, and helps to improve the teaching quality. The AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation methods are used in the evaluation process. According to the different evaluation subjects designed different evaluation indicators and given different weights, so it reduces the error between the calculation value and the real value caused by the individual reason of the evaluation subject. It has certain practical significance, at the same time can be convenient, objective evaluation of the teaching level of teachers. The innovation of this study lies in the construction of higher vocational education classroom teaching generality. It also embodies the comprehensive characteristics of basic disciplines, rationality and operability of the combination of the evaluation index system, and detailed analysis of the indicators; It not only makes full use of the advantages of the evaluation index system of classroom teaching quality in higher vocational education, but also reflects the law and characteristics of teaching. The evaluation method studied in this paper can also be used to make decisions on related problems in economy and other fields of engineering life, which has strong feasibility, portability and expansibility.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：G712

【参考文献】

中国期刊全文数据库前10条

1 纪俊玲;;工科院校基础课教学质量的现状与对策[J];常州信息职业技术学院学报;2007年06期

2 张文辉;祁富燕;王玲;;层次分析法在教师教学质量评估体系中的应用研究[J];甘肃高师学报;2011年02期

3 汪建东;;高校课堂教学质量的定量综合评判方法研究[J];湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年04期

4 刘恩允;高等学校教学质量评价体系建构的思考[J];黑龙江高教研究;2004年03期

5 王龙;关于影响高校基础课教学质量因素的探索[J];黑龙江高教研究;2005年10期

6 蒋秀娟;;大学英语课堂教学评价的模糊优化模型[J];黑龙江高教研究;2007年11期

7 王贵艳;杨丽;王琳;;高等数学教学质量的评价分析——基于层次分析法对教师教学能力的评价与分析[J];黑龙江科技信息;2010年16期

8 王余明;;对高职教育公共基础课教学改革的思考[J];江苏经贸职业技术学院学报;2010年02期

9 杜祥培;课堂教学质量评价的探讨[J];中国大学教学;2004年01期

10 宋秋前;潘爱珍;;高校公共基础课教学有效性调查与思考[J];中国大学教学;2009年05期