内蒙古高职院校教师职称评审改革研究
本文选题:职业教育 切入点:高职教师 出处:《内蒙古大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:高职教育在教育定位上与本科教育存在明显的不同,高职教育仿佛是架在高等教育、职业教育以及职业这三者之间的一座桥梁,它可以有效地弥补传统教育体系的缺陷。普通高等教育走的是学术型人才的育人路线,而高职教育则专注于对学生技术的传授,使其成为社会所需的、具有特定的理论基础的高素质应用型人才,这是高职教育义不容辞的责任。而高职教师则是这一人才培养责任的承载者,因此高职院校教师队伍建设不仅关系到高职院校的发展,而且关乎高职教育的教学质量,更影响人才培养目标的实现。高职院校教师职称评审有利于推动教师队伍建设,不仅可以引导高职教师专业发展而且可以激励教师积极投身于高职教育事业的指挥棒,如何能让这个指挥棒发挥其良好的作用,目前我国许多专家学者针对这一焦点问题进行探讨研究,客观分析目前高职院校教师职称评审显现的弊端,并对其改革提出各自的合理化建议。本论文的写作思路遵循理论研究-实证分析-对策探讨的线索,以职称评审的相关理论为基础,包含人力资源管理理论、激励理论、公平理论以及教师专业化理论;以分析内蒙古地区高职院校教师职称评审的现状为着手,从初、中、高三个等级进行阐述;客观剖析目前内蒙古地区高职院校教师职称评审存在的不良现象,进而进行原因分析的论述;再结合目前国内外高职院校教师职称制度的特点以及给我区高职院校教师职称改革带来的启示,最终提出内蒙古地区高职院校教师职称评审的改革原则及对策分析。职称之路是高职教师专业发展的必经之路,高职教师的专业发展要体现其"双师"素质的培养及提高,因此高职教师职称评审应摆脱普通高等院校(综合类大学)教师职称评审模式的影响,另辟蹊径,单独设置符合高职教师的专业技术职称评审的条件和标准,既满足高职教师的专业发展需求,又满足高职教师对其职称评审改革的诉求,保证高职院校教师队伍健康、良好地发展,加强高职院校内涵建设,提高高职教育质量。
[Abstract]:The orientation of higher vocational education is obviously different from that of undergraduate education. Higher vocational education seems to be a bridge between higher education, vocational education and vocational education. It can effectively remedy the shortcomings of the traditional educational system. The general higher education takes the educational route of academic talents, while the higher vocational education focuses on the teaching of students' technology, making it necessary for the society. It is the duty of higher vocational education to have high quality applied talents with specific theoretical foundation, and higher vocational teachers are the carriers of this talent training responsibility. Therefore, the construction of teachers in higher vocational colleges is not only related to the development of higher vocational colleges, but also to the teaching quality of higher vocational education, and also to the realization of the goal of talent training. It can not only guide the professional development of higher vocational teachers, but also inspire teachers to actively devote themselves to the cause of higher vocational education. How can we make this baton play its good role? At present, many experts and scholars in our country have studied this focus problem, and objectively analyzed the disadvantages of teachers' professional title evaluation in higher vocational colleges. This paper follows the clue of theoretical research, empirical analysis and countermeasure discussion, based on the relevant theories of professional title evaluation, including human resource management theory, incentive theory, etc. The theory of fairness and the theory of teacher specialization, starting with the analysis of the status quo of the evaluation of teachers' professional titles in higher vocational colleges in Inner Mongolia, is expounded from the initial, middle and high levels. This paper analyzes objectively the bad phenomenon of teachers' professional title evaluation in higher vocational colleges in Inner Mongolia at present, and then discusses the reasons. Combined with the characteristics of teachers' professional title system at home and abroad and the enlightenment to the reform of teachers' professional titles in vocational colleges and universities in our district, Finally, the author puts forward the reform principle and countermeasure analysis of teachers' professional title evaluation in Inner Mongolia. The road of professional title is the only way for the professional development of higher vocational teachers, and the professional development of higher vocational teachers should embody the cultivation and improvement of their "double teachers" quality. Therefore, the professional title evaluation of higher vocational teachers should get rid of the influence of the professional title evaluation model of ordinary colleges and universities (comprehensive universities), and set up the conditions and standards that accord with the professional and technical titles of higher vocational teachers separately. It not only meets the professional development needs of higher vocational teachers, but also meets the demands of teachers' professional title evaluation and reform, ensures the healthy and good development of teachers in higher vocational colleges, strengthens the connotation construction of higher vocational colleges, and improves the quality of higher vocational education.
【学位授予单位】:内蒙古大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G715.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨巧艳;石剑虹;;高校职称评审工作问题分析及对策研究[J];教育教学论坛;2014年51期
2 杨晓飞;包洋;;高职院校“双师型”教师资格认定、考核及评价指标量化研究[J];长春师范学院学报;2013年10期
3 王凌峰;;高校职称评审存在的问题及其对策[J];广西社会科学;2013年01期
4 俞启定;王为民;;审视与反思:我国高职教师职称评审标准的套用问题[J];教师教育研究;2013年01期
5 张舸;李飞虹;;高职教师职称评审体系的构建与研究[J];成人教育;2012年10期
6 张舸;;构建以实践能力为导向的高职教师职称评审体系的研究[J];教育与职业;2012年24期
7 阳银安;;重业绩 轻论文——济南职称改革激活经济发展“第一资源”[J];中国人才;2012年07期
8 张舸;王亚;;“双师素质”教师队伍建设的困境与对策[J];教育探索;2012年03期
9 余兴龙;;以公平为导向的职称评审制度构建研究[J];中国行政管理;2011年11期
10 李梦卿;罗莉;;“双师型”教师职称:职教教师专业发展的保证[J];职教论坛;2011年22期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 汤霓;英、美、德三国职业教育师资培养的比较研究[D];华东师范大学;2016年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 李大寨;我国职业教育教师培养培训模式研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2012年
2 周彦文;企业参与高等职业技术教育人才培养模式研究[D];西南大学;2011年
3 吕淑芳;论新升格高职院校“双师型”教学团队建设[D];中南民族大学;2010年
,本文编号:1676676
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/zhiyejiaoyulunwen/1676676.html