中国民办高职院校多维评价实证研究

发布时间：2018-06-16 18:22

本文选题：民办高职院校 + 欧盟多维评价体系　；参考：《高教发展与评估》2017年05期

【摘要】：欧盟多维评价体系(U-Multirank)在大学排行的争议声中应运而生,但作为一种创新的理念,它对中国民办高职院校的评价具有较强的借鉴价值。将多维大学评价理念引入民办高职院校这类特殊的学校群体,在构建指标体系时,要充分考虑中国的实情,并立足于民办高职院校发展的现状,尽量解决指标的适应性、数据的权威性和结果的导向性等问题。本研究从五个维度研制了民办高职院校多维评价的指标体系,即:办学规范维度,教育资源维度,教与学维度,产教结合维度,学生评价维度。依据5个一级指标,24个二级指标对上海地区12所民办高职院校进行测试。其结果表明,在维度与指标的可行性、可操作性方面,民办高职院校多维评价体系取得了一些成效;考虑到民办高职的多重功能和不同利益相关方,有效地避免了传统综合排名所引进的不必要的"声誉竞争";考虑到民办高职院校的发展实际,顺应了民办高等教育的发展思路。由于方便用户(学校、政府、学生及社会)的比较,柱形图形式清晰地展示了学校的优势和"短板",避免了传统综合评价排序模糊笼统的单一结果。
[Abstract]:The multi-dimensional evaluation system of European Union (EU) emerges as the times require in the controversy of university ranking, but as an innovative idea, it has a strong reference value for the evaluation of private vocational colleges in China. This paper introduces the concept of multi-dimensional university evaluation into private higher vocational colleges, which is a special school group. When constructing the index system, we should fully consider the reality of China, base on the current situation of the development of private higher vocational colleges, and try to solve the adaptability of the index as far as possible. The authority of the data and the guidance of the results and so on. This research has developed the multidimensional evaluation index system of private higher vocational colleges from five dimensions, namely: the standard dimension of running a school, the dimension of educational resources, the dimension of teaching and learning, the dimension of combination of production and teaching, and the dimension of student evaluation. According to 5 first class indexes and 24 second grade indexes, 12 private higher vocational colleges in Shanghai were tested. The results show that the multidimensional evaluation system of private higher vocational colleges has achieved some results in the feasibility and operability of dimensions and indicators, considering the multi-function of private vocational colleges and different stakeholders, It effectively avoids the unnecessary "reputation competition" introduced by the traditional comprehensive ranking, and conforms to the thinking of the development of private higher education considering the development reality of the private higher vocational colleges. Because it is convenient for users (school, government, students and society) to compare, the form of column chart clearly shows the advantages of school and "short board", and avoids the single result of fuzzy and general ranking of traditional comprehensive evaluation.
【作者单位】：上海市教育科学研究院高等教育研究所;上海建桥学院;
【基金】：上海市民办教育协会2014年度重点课题(SMB1405)
【分类号】：G719.2

【相似文献】