英国和德国现代学徒制的比较研究——基于制度互补性的视角

发布时间：2018-06-30 21:53

本文选题：英国现代学徒制 + 德国现代学徒制　；参考：《华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)》2017年01期

【摘要】：西方国家现代学徒制的发展不是制度趋同的过程,而是制度多样化的过程。制度互补性理论为现代学徒制度的多样性发展提供了解释。制度互补性分析框架由规制性要素、规范性要素和文化—认知性要素三个互补性维度组成。对英国和德国现代学徒制的比较亦在此框架下围绕学徒激励、企业激励和质量保障三大制度基本功能分别展开。比较结果表明:相互加强或相互弥补是现代学徒制制度互补的两大形式,均衡性系统倾向于相互加强,发展性系统倾向于相互弥补;制度弥补的着力点在于规制性的制度要素;学徒激励的制度互补性核心在于提供良好的学徒职业前景预期;企业激励的制度互补性核心在于降低学徒培训外部性偷猎风险;质量保障的制度互补性依赖学徒培养资质、标准、过程、评价多环节制度保障的相互加强;数量功能和质量功能的制度亦存在互补性。
[Abstract]:The development of modern apprenticeship in western countries is not a process of institutional convergence, but a process of institutional diversification. The theory of institutional complementarity provides an explanation for the diversity of modern apprenticeship systems. The framework of institutional complementarity analysis consists of three complementary dimensions: regulatory elements, normative elements and culture-cognitive elements. The comparison of modern apprenticeship system in England and Germany also revolves around the basic functions of apprenticeship incentive, enterprise incentive and quality assurance. The results show that: mutual reinforcement or mutual compensation is the two major forms of modern apprenticeship system complementation, the balanced system tends to strengthen each other, the developmental system tends to make up for each other, the emphasis of institutional compensation lies in the institutional elements of regulation. The core of institutional complementarity of apprenticeship incentive is to provide good expectation of apprenticeship career prospect, the institutional complementarity of enterprise incentive lies in reducing the external poaching risk of apprenticeship training, and the institutional complementarity of quality assurance depends on apprenticeship training qualification. Standards, processes, and evaluation systems reinforce each other, while quantitative and qualitative systems complement each other.
【作者单位】：上海师范大学教育学院;
【基金】：2015年度教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“职业教育现代学徒制理论研究与实践探索”(15JZD046)
【分类号】：G719.1

【相似文献】