企业参与职业教育的动机偏好及政策效度的实证研究
发布时间：2018-11-02 09:34
【摘要】：本文通过构建多元线性回归模型,以机械行业企业参与职业教育的数据,分析企业参与职业教育的动机偏好、政府政策作用机制与政策效度。实证研究结果表明:我国企业参与职业教育具有成本偏好和技能偏好,两者之间存在负的交互作用。政府政策对于企业参与职业教育的技能偏好有正向促进作用,却对成本偏好有负的调节作用。从政策效果看,政府政策对成本偏好性的企业的政策效果要好于技术偏好性的政策效果,显示出明显的成本补偿性的政策倾向。
[Abstract]:Based on the data of enterprise participation in vocational education in mechanical industry, this paper analyzes the motivation preference, government policy mechanism and policy validity of enterprises participating in vocational education by building a multivariate linear regression model. The empirical results show that Chinese enterprises' participation in vocational education has cost preference and skill preference, and there is a negative interaction between them. Government policy has a positive effect on the skill preference of enterprises to participate in vocational education, but it has a negative effect on the adjustment of cost preference. From the point of view of policy effect, the policy effect of government policy on enterprises with cost preference is better than that of technology preference, showing obvious policy tendency of cost compensation.
【作者单位】： 天津大学教育学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金一般项目“企业参与职业教育的行为差异化内在机理研究”(14BGL209) 天津市教委重大攻关项目“京津冀教育协调管理机制研究”(2014H2-0042)的部分成果
【分类号】：G719.2
本文编号：2305648
[Abstract]:Based on the data of enterprise participation in vocational education in mechanical industry, this paper analyzes the motivation preference, government policy mechanism and policy validity of enterprises participating in vocational education by building a multivariate linear regression model. The empirical results show that Chinese enterprises' participation in vocational education has cost preference and skill preference, and there is a negative interaction between them. Government policy has a positive effect on the skill preference of enterprises to participate in vocational education, but it has a negative effect on the adjustment of cost preference. From the point of view of policy effect, the policy effect of government policy on enterprises with cost preference is better than that of technology preference, showing obvious policy tendency of cost compensation.
【作者单位】： 天津大学教育学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金一般项目“企业参与职业教育的行为差异化内在机理研究”(14BGL209) 天津市教委重大攻关项目“京津冀教育协调管理机制研究”(2014H2-0042)的部分成果
【分类号】：G719.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 王建良;孔晓明;吴满华;张天宝;;提高高职院校教师教学质量评价效度的思考[J];管理观察;2008年20期
2 王建良;孔晓明;张天宝;;提高高职院校教师教学质量评价效度的思考[J];当代教育论坛(下半月刊);2009年03期
3 徐仿庭;考试及考试命题浅谈[J];现代技能开发;2003年05期
4 乔娟;;提高辅导员工作考核信度与效度的对策[J];职业技术教育;2010年05期
5 《职业院校学生心理健康及教育对策研究》课题组;甄国红;;职业院校学生SCL—90信度、效度检验与常模建立[J];职业技术教育;2003年34期
6 马兴友;郭玉娟;;高职高专试卷分析[J];卫生职业教育;2006年17期
，本文编号：2305648
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/zhiyejiaoyulunwen/2305648.html
