美国基础教育理科教科书评价标准及其启示 南京廖华

  本文关键词：美国基础教育理科教科书评价标准及其启示，，由笔耕文化传播整理发布。

杨文源 刘恩山：美国基础教育理科教科书评价标准及其启示

view=3&ti=19&pt=2. 2013-04-22.

[17]Texas Education Agency. Instructional

Materials [S]. // Education Code, Title 2 Public Education, Subtitle F Curriculum Programs and Services, Chapter 31. July 2011. 2013-04-22.

[18]State of Texas, Texas Education Agency. State

Adoption and Distribution of Instructional Materials [S]. // Texas Administrative Code, Title 19 Education, Part 2 Texas Education Agency, Chapter 66. $ext.ViewTAC?tac_view=4&ti=19&pt=2&ch=66. 2013-04-22.

[19]Texas Education Agency. State and Local

Adoption of Instructional Materials Overview [Z]. Jun 2010. 2013-04-22.

[20]California Department of Education.

Instructional Materials Evaluation and Adoption Process [EB/OL]. May, 2012. 2013-04-22.

[21]State of California. California Education

Code Section 60040-60044 [EB/OL].

leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=edc&group=60001-61000&file=60040-60052. 2013-04-22.

[22]Curriculum Frameworks and Instructional

Resources Division, California Department of Education, California State Board of Education. Standards for Evaluating Instructional Materials for Social Content (2000 Edition). January 2000: 1-15.

[23]State of California. California Education

Code Section 60200-60204 [EB/OL]. ?section=edc&group=60001-61000&file=60200-60208. 2013-04-22.

[24]Marvin C. Alkin, Christina A. Christie. An

Evaluation Theory Tree [M]. // Marvin C. Alkin. Evaluation Roots: Tracing Theorists’ Views and Influences. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc., 2004: 12-65.

[25]Dijana Plut, Jelena Pesic. Toward a

Vygotskian Theory of Textbook [J]. Psihologija, 2003, 36(4): 501-515.

[26]中华人民共和国教育部. 基础教育课程改革纲要

(试行)[S]. 教基(2001)17号, 2001年7月印发. 2013-04-22.

An Overview on K-12 Science Textbook Evaluation in USA

YANG Wenyuan LIU Enshan

Abstract: The researches on K-12 textbook evaluation were started in the mid-19th century in United States. Up to now, the studies have been increasingly mature and systematic. Compatible with the education administration system, there are both national “2061 Project” textbook evaluation criteria and state textbook evaluation criteria based on national criteria in United States, which are significant references to our studies on science textbook evaluation.

Keywords: K-12 Science Education; Science Textbook; Textbook Evaluation

－　５９　－

美国基础教育理科教科书评价标准及其启示

作者：作者单位：刊名：英文刊名：年，卷(期)：

杨文源， 刘恩山， YANG Wenyuan， LIU Enshan

北京师范大学生命科学学院生物学课程与教学论专业 北京100875外国中小学教育

Elementary & Secondary Schooling Abroad2013(8)

1.United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO);Georg Eckert Institute for InternationalTextbook Research UNESCO Guidebook on Textbook Research and Textbook Revision (2nd revised and updated edition) 20102.Floyd L. Haight Evaluation of Instructional Materials 1951

3.J. Myron Atkin;Ernest R. House The Federal Role in Curriculum Development,1950-80[J] 1981(05)

4.The National Commission on Excellence in Education A Nation at Risk:The Imperative for Educational Reform (A Report tothe Nation and the Secretary of Education,United States Department of Education 1983

5.Pinchas Tamir;Vincent N. Lunetta Inquiry-Related Tasks in High School Science Laboratory Handbooks 1981(05)6.Eugene L. Chiappetta;David A. Fillman;Godrej H. Sethna A Method to Quantify Major Themes of Scientific Literacy inScience Textbooks 1991(08)

7.Michael M. Heise Goals 2000:Educate America Act:The Federalization and Legalization of Educational Policy 1994(02)8.Susan Sclafani No Child Left Behind[外文期刊] 2003(02)

9.American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) About Project 2061 2013

10.Gerald Kulm;Jo Ellen Roseman;Michelle Treistman A Benchmarks-Based Approach to Textbook Evaluation 1999(4)11.Gerald Kulm;Laura Girer Mathematics Curriculum Materials Analysis Reliability Study 201312.American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Project 2061 Textbook Evaluation 201313.Jo Ellen Roseman;Gerald Kulm;Susan Shuttleworth Putting Textbooks to the Test 201314.Susan Watts Taffe Textbook Selection and Respect for Diversity in the United States 2006

15.Florida Department of Education;Bureau of Curriculum and Instruction Office of Instructional Materials Priorities forEvaluating Instructional Materials:Research Update 2008

16.State of Texas;Texas Education Agency Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills Texas Administrative Code, Title 19Education, Part 2 Texas Education Agency, Chapter 110-118&126-128&130 2013

17.Texas Education Agency Instructional MaterialsEducation Code, Title 2 Public Education, Subtitle F CurriculumPrograms and Services, Chapter 31 2013

18.State of Texas;Texas Education Agency State Adoption and Distribution of Instructional Materials Texas AdministrativeCode, Title 19 Education, Part 2 Texas Education Agency, Chapter 66 2013

19.Texas Education Agency State and Local Adoption of Instructional Materials Overview 201320.California Department of Education Instructional Materials Evaluation and Adoption Process 201321.State of California California Education Code Section 60040-60044 2013

22.Curriculum Frameworks and Instructional Resources Division;California Department of Education;California State Boardof Education Standards for Evaluating Instructional Materials for Social Content (2000 Edition) 200023.State of California California Education Code Section 60200-60204 201324.Marvin C. Alkin;Christina A. Christie An Evaluation Theory Tree 200425.Dijana Plut;Jelena Pesic Toward a Vygotskian Theory of Textbook 2003(04)26.中华人民共和国教育部 基础教育课程改革纲要(试行) 教基(2001)17号 2013

引用本文格式：杨文源.刘恩山.YANG Wenyuan.LIU Enshan 美国基础教育理科教科书评价标准及其启示[期刊论文]-外国中小学教育

2013(8)

  本文关键词：美国基础教育理科教科书评价标准及其启示，由笔耕文化传播整理发布。