基于“信息”的食品安全治理进路之反思——以公众监督为主要研究对象

发布时间：2018-01-02 06:13

本文关键词：基于“信息”的食品安全治理进路之反思——以公众监督为主要研究对象　出处：《理论与改革》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：面对食品安全领域因严重的信息不对称而引起的市场失灵甚至政府失灵,重塑信息通路、构建多元共治体系诚然是有效解决眼前困境的关键。然而,我国当下社会公众普遍对于食品业者道德水平、政府治理能力以及各类主要食品信息来源准确性的质疑,不仅引发了消费者的非理性反馈行为,并由此导致了对食品业者质量选择行为严重的负面激励和政府治理负荷的加重,同时亦使得矫正消费者制度信任与参与激励的信息可验证性要求过于苛刻,令作为共治体系关键一环的公众监督无法实现。在此背景下,应通过适当提升行业自律以放松信任危机背景下"社会共治"对于信息要件的苛刻要求,最终将社会监督引入正轨,并以之为契机形成各共治主体的良性互动。
[Abstract]:In the face of market failure or even government failure caused by serious information asymmetry in the field of food safety, it is the key to effectively solve the immediate dilemma to reshape the information access and build a pluralistic and co-governing system. At present, the public in our country generally doubt the moral level of food industry, the ability of government governance and the accuracy of all kinds of main food information sources, which not only lead to irrational feedback behavior of consumers. And this led to serious negative incentives for food industry quality choice behavior and the increase of the burden of government governance. At the same time, the information verifiability requirements of correcting consumer institutional trust and participation incentives are too harsh. The public supervision as the key link of co-governance system can not be realized. In this context, we should relax the harsh requirements of "social co-governance" for information elements by properly promoting industry self-discipline in the context of trust crisis. Finally, the social supervision is introduced on the right track, and take it as an opportunity to form the positive interaction of the co-governing subjects.
【作者单位】：西南财经大学法学院;
【分类号】：F203;D621.5
【正文快照】： 10.13553/j.cnki.llygg.2017.02.019根据Darby与Karni的经典理论框架[1],“食品安全”属于典型的信任质量(credence qualities),其之所以易于引发市场失灵,在于消费者往往在食用后也无法确切得知该食品对其身体健康是否会产生不利影响。在这一背景下,国内不少学者开始关注引入

【参考文献】