环境规制与工业绿色全要素生产率——基于命令—控制型与市场激励型规制工具的实证分析

发布时间：2018-01-28 08:53

  本文关键词： 环境规制 工业绿色全要素生产率 命令—控制型 市场激励型　出处：《研究与发展管理》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文利用1997—2013年中国30个省区市的资源消耗、环境污染和经济发展数据,结合Super-DEA方法对中国省际工业绿色全要素生产率进行测算,并以此为基础探究中国不同环境规制工具的节能减排效应差异.结果表明:市场激励型比命令—控制型规制工具更具减排灵活性和激励长效性,命令—控制型规制手段对区域工业绿色全要素生产率的影响呈U形关系,基于经济激励方式下"利用市场"的环境政策工具——排污收费制度效应为正,而"建立市场"的环境政策工具——排污权交易试点政策并未表现出显著稳定的效应;东部地区的规制运行整体优于中西部地区,西部次之,中部最差;环境法制的完善对政府"利用市场"起到一定的促进作用,但"建立市场"的法制体系尚未健全.最后,提出相应的政策建议.
[Abstract]:This paper uses the data of resource consumption, environmental pollution and economic development of 30 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities in China from 1997 to 2013. Combined with Super-DEA method, the green total factor productivity of interprovincial industry in China is measured. The results show that the market incentive model is more flexible and more effective than the command-control regulation tool in terms of energy saving and emission reduction effects of different environmental regulation tools in China. The influence of command-control regulation means on the green total factor productivity of regional industry is U-shaped, and the environmental policy tool of "utilizing the market" based on the economic incentive mode, the pollution charge system, is positive. However, the environmental policy tool of "establishing market", the pilot policy of emission trading, did not show a significant stable effect; The regulation operation of the eastern region is better than that of the central and western regions as a whole, followed by the western region, and the central region is the worst. The perfection of the environmental legal system promotes the government to "utilize the market", but the legal system of "establishing the market" is not perfect. Finally, the corresponding policy suggestions are put forward.
【作者单位】： 浙江理工大学经济管理学院;浙江省生态文明研究中心;陕西师范大学国际商学院;兴业银行博士后科研工作站;
【基金】：浙江省哲学社会科学研究基地规划项目“生态科技创新的环境规制路径优化研究”(16DGH088) 浙江理工大学科研启动基金资助项目“以产业绿色转型为导向的环境规制研究”(16092198-Y)
【分类号】：X32;F224;F424
【正文快照】： 工业作为中国实体经济的产业主体,是物质财富的重要来源,工业化道路使得我国经济快速增长、财富迅速积累,成为实现国富民强的重要路径.然而,以大规模消耗资源和牺牲环境为代价、“先污染、后治理”的粗放型发展模式,不仅造成了日益严峻的环境污染和生态失衡问题,也严重地制约，

本文编号：1470308