资源型城市甘肃省庆阳市新型城镇化质量评价研究
本文选题:庆阳市 切入点:资源型城市 出处:《四川师范大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:新型城镇化是未来我国城镇化发展的必然趋势,资源型城市是我国一部分特殊的城市群体,借力新型城镇化实现城市转型升级是资源型城市实现可持续发展的重要机遇。本文依据庆阳市石油资源分布、近30年来(1986-2015)石油产量和15年(2001-2015)的原油加工量、近5年(2011-2015)城镇化率等数据,采用锡尔指数法、城市首位度、位序-规模法则和多指标综合评价法进行资源型城市甘肃省庆阳市新型城镇化质量评价研究。得到以下结论:(1)庆阳市石油资源富集,但各县区分布不均。该市石油产业发展以石油开采业为主,原油加工能力薄弱。通过庆阳市石油主产县区(镇原、华池县、环县和庆城县)和非石油主产县区(西峰区、正宁县、宁县、合水县)的对比分析,得出庆阳市石油主产县区的石油开发对提高其产业结构中的非农产业产值有一定促进作用,对人均GDP也略有提高作用,但作用十分有限,而对城镇化率的影响更是有限。(2)近5年来(2011-2015)庆阳市城镇化率有较大提高(由25.07%提高到33.46%),处于城镇化快速发展阶段,但整体城镇化水平偏低,城镇化率区域差异明显。近5年(2011-2015)庆阳市城镇化水平区域差异的锡尔指数有明显减少趋势。该市城镇化水平差异的锡尔指数主要源于该市内部各县区城镇化水平的差异(贡献率大于75%),与基于地理环境和区域发展分区、基于石油产业情况分组的区域间或组间差异的关系不大(贡献率小于25%)。值得注意的是,从分区与分组的分区内部与分组内部来看,市域中南部区域内部和石油主产县区内部的城镇化水平差异明显。(3)近5年来(2011-2015)庆阳市各区县城镇规模分布与位次高度相关,符合城镇规模分布的位序—规模法则。该市高位次城镇规模集聚不明显,中间位序城镇比较发育,城镇人口分布相对较均衡。首位城镇的规模在不断增大,小城镇集聚性低、发展水平有待提高。(4)庆阳市新型城镇化发展质量总得分(0.3470)位于甘肃省7个地级资源型城市(庆阳、金昌、白银、武威、张掖、平凉、陇南)的第4位,整体城镇化质量偏低。在四个新型城镇化质量指标类型中,庆阳市人口城镇化质量和经济城镇化质量的偏低现象尤为突出,社会城镇化质量和生态环境城镇化质量也较低。该市石油资源空间布局的孤立性,以石油开采为主的产业发展模式与城镇化的偏离以及庆阳市城镇规模体系发育不完善、小城镇建设发展不足是庆阳市新型城镇化发展的主要限制因素。庆阳市应发挥石油资源优势,提升石油产业发展对庆阳市新型城镇化的促进作用;因地制宜地推动区域产业结构多样化发展和区域城镇化水平提高;完善区域城镇体系结构,积极促进中小城市的发展;注重区域内生态环境建设。
[Abstract]:The new type of urbanization is the inevitable trend of the urbanization development in our country in the future. The resource-based cities are part of the special urban groups in our country. Taking advantage of new urbanization to realize urban transformation and upgrading is an important opportunity for resource-based cities to achieve sustainable development. According to the distribution of petroleum resources in Qingyang City, the oil production in recent 30 years and the crude oil processing volume of 15 years (1986-2015) and 15 years (2001-2015) are discussed in this paper. In the past five years (2011-2015), the rate of urbanization and other data, using the Sier index method, the first degree of the city, The new urbanization quality evaluation of Qingyang City, Gansu Province, is studied by the method of position-scale rule and multi-index comprehensive evaluation. The following conclusions are drawn: 1) the accumulation of petroleum resources in Qingyang City, Gansu Province. However, the distribution of the counties and districts is uneven. The petroleum industry in this city is mainly developed in the petroleum exploitation industry and the crude oil processing capacity is weak. Through the main petroleum producing counties of Qingyang city (Zhenyuan, Huachi County, Huan County and Qingcheng County) and the non-oil producing counties (Xifeng District), The comparative analysis of Zhengning County, Ningxian County and Heshui County) shows that the oil development in the main petroleum producing counties of Qingyang City has a certain role in promoting the output value of non-agricultural industries in its industrial structure, and has a slight effect on the per capita GDP, but the effect is very limited. The impact on the urbanization rate is even more limited. 2) in the past five years, the urbanization rate of Qingyang City has been greatly improved (from 25.07% to 33.46%), which is in the rapid development stage of urbanization, but the overall urbanization level is relatively low. In the past five years, the Sier index of the urbanization level in Qingyang city has a significant decreasing trend. The Sier index of the urbanization level difference in the city is mainly from the urbanization level of the counties and districts within the city. The difference (the contribution rate is greater than 75%) is different from that based on geographical environment and regional development, The inter-regional or inter-group differences based on the oil industry situation are of little relevance (the contribution rate is less than 25%). The difference of urbanization level between the central and southern regions of the city and the main oil producing counties is obvious in the past 5 years.) the distribution of cities and towns in different districts and counties in Qingyang City is highly correlated with the order of cities and counties in the past five years. In accordance with the law of scale distribution of cities and towns, the scale agglomeration of high rank towns in the city is not obvious, the middle order cities and towns are relatively developed, the distribution of urban population is relatively balanced, the scale of the first town is increasing, and the agglomeration of small towns is low. The total score of Qingyang's new urbanization development quality is 0.3470), which is located in the fourth place of seven prefecture-level resource-based cities (Qingyang, Jinchang, Baiyin, Wuwei, Zhangye, Pingliang, Longnan) in Gansu Province. The overall urbanization quality is on the low side. Among the four new types of urbanization quality indicators, the low quality of population urbanization and economic urbanization in Qingyang City is particularly prominent. The quality of social urbanization and ecological environment urbanization is also relatively low. The isolation of the spatial distribution of oil resources, the deviation between the industrial development model dominated by oil exploitation and urbanization, and the imperfect development of urban scale system in Qingyang City. The lack of development of small towns is the main limiting factor for the development of new urbanization in Qingyang City, which should give full play to the advantages of petroleum resources and promote the role of the development of petroleum industry in the development of new urbanization in Qingyang City. According to local conditions, we should promote the diversification of regional industrial structure and improve the level of regional urbanization; perfect the structure of regional urban system, actively promote the development of small and medium-sized cities; and pay attention to the construction of ecological environment in the region.
【学位授予单位】:四川师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F299.27
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 韩笑;;资源型城市经济转型地区新型城镇化模式分析及实践路径[J];商业经济;2016年08期
2 刘敏;张占仓;;河南省新型城镇化的制约因素与推进对策[J];经济地理;2016年03期
3 贾兴梅;李俊;贾伟;;安徽省新型城镇化协调水平测度与比较[J];经济地理;2016年02期
4 孟庆香;郭施宏;吴升;;福建省城镇化质量空间差异评价[J];中国农业资源与区划;2015年07期
5 范晓莉;黄凌翔;;京津冀城市群城市规模分布特征[J];干旱区资源与环境;2015年09期
6 张引;杨庆媛;李闯;杨孟禹;;重庆市新型城镇化发展质量评价与比较分析[J];经济地理;2015年07期
7 杨传开;张凡;宁越敏;;山东省城镇化发展态势及其新型城镇化路径[J];经济地理;2015年06期
8 陈明星;;城市化领域的研究进展和科学问题[J];地理研究;2015年04期
9 陆大道;陈明星;;关于“国家新型城镇化规划(2014-2020)”编制大背景的几点认识[J];地理学报;2015年02期
10 王新越;宋樝;宋斐红;于世远;;山东省新型城镇化的测度与空间分异研究[J];地理科学;2014年09期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 赵景海;我国资源型城市空间发展研究[D];东北师范大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 孔静;四川省安岳县城镇体系结构特征与城镇化发展研究[D];四川师范大学;2015年
,本文编号:1573692
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjifazhanlunwen/1573692.html