京津冀城市群基础设施综合评价
本文选题:基础设施 + 主成分分析 ; 参考:《河北大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:京津冀协同发展已上升为国家战略,而城市基础设施是京津冀做好持续发展的配套物质基础。完善的基础设施有助于改善社会面貌、提升生产力,基础设施同样是建设社会主义现代化城市的重要内容。最为重要的是,同发展不配套的基础设施不仅无法支撑经济的进步,更将制约城市的全面发展。因此,在京津冀协同发展的背景下,了解京津冀基础设施建设水平现状,探究其存在的问题,并针对问题提出可行的相应对策建议,是京津冀需要解决的重大现实问题,同样也是保障京津冀协同发展的重要举措。本文通过对国内外基础设施相关文献的研究,结合公共产品、社会先行资本、外部性、自然垄断、政府管制、资源优化配置等理论,对基础设施的属性进行了界定,并进一步界定了本文所研究的基础设施的内涵。通过对京津冀城市群13个城市基础设施建设的投资和建设现状进行比较,分析京津冀城市群基础设施存在的问题。从涉及基础设施的道路交通、给水排水、能源动力、生态环保四个子系统出发,选取14个评价指标,构建了基础设施评价指标体系。建立了基础设施综合评价分析模型,采用主成分分析法对京津冀城市群基础设施建设水平进行综合评价,并采用聚类分析法对评价结果进行检验,两种方法的分析结果总体趋于一致,说明本文的评价是可靠的。综合评价结果表明:京津冀城市群基础设施建设的总体水平不够理想,基础设施水平处于平均水平之上的只有天津市、北京市、秦皇岛市、廊坊市、衡水市5个城市,仅占京津冀城市群城市个数的38.46%,并按照基础设施建设水平将京津冀城市群分为三类。进一步对基础设施的四个子系统进行主成分分析,得到其得分和排名,从而详细的分析各个城市基础设施现有的不足。最终,从落实改善不足、打破行政限制、拓宽资金渠道、引入市场机制、建立居民协会、形成长效机制等方面,对京津冀城市群基础设施建设提出对策建议。
[Abstract]:The coordinated development of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei has become a national strategy, and urban infrastructure is the supporting material foundation for Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei to do a good job of sustainable development. Perfect infrastructure helps to improve the social outlook and productivity. Infrastructure is also an important part of building a modern socialist city. The most important thing is that the infrastructure which is not matched with the development can not only support the economic progress, but also restrict the overall development of the city. Therefore, under the background of the coordinated development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, understanding the present situation of infrastructure construction in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, exploring the existing problems, and putting forward feasible countermeasures and suggestions are the major practical problems that need to be solved by Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei. It is also an important measure to ensure the coordinated development of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei. This paper defines the properties of infrastructure through the study of the relevant literature on infrastructure at home and abroad, combined with the theories of public goods, social capital first, externality, natural monopoly, government regulation, resource optimization and so on. And further define the connotation of the infrastructure studied in this paper. By comparing the investment and construction status of infrastructure construction in 13 cities of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration, this paper analyzes the problems existing in the infrastructure construction of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. Based on the four subsystems of road traffic, water supply and drainage, energy power and ecological environmental protection, 14 evaluation indexes were selected and the evaluation index system of infrastructure was constructed. A comprehensive evaluation and analysis model of infrastructure is established, and the level of infrastructure construction of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration is evaluated by principal component analysis, and the evaluation results are tested by cluster analysis. The analysis results of the two methods tend to be consistent, indicating that the evaluation in this paper is reliable. The comprehensive evaluation results show that the overall level of infrastructure construction in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration is not ideal enough. Only five cities above the average level are Tianjin, Beijing, Qinhuangdao, Langfang and Hengshui. It only accounts for 38.46 cities of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration, and divides Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration into three categories according to infrastructure construction level. The four subsystems of infrastructure are further analyzed by principal component analysis (PCA), and their scores and rankings are obtained, and then the shortcomings of each urban infrastructure are analyzed in detail. Finally, the countermeasures and suggestions for the infrastructure construction of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration are put forward from the aspects of implementing the improvement insufficiency, breaking the administrative restriction, widening the capital channel, introducing the market mechanism, establishing the residents' association and forming the long-term effect mechanism.
【学位授予单位】:河北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F299.24
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈银娥;孙琼;;中国基础设施发展水平测算及影响因素——基于省级面板数据的实证研究[J];经济地理;2016年08期
2 荣月静;张慧;赵显富;;基于多因素综合评价法的长三角地区城市基础设施建设水平研究[J];科技通报;2016年02期
3 李祺;孙钰;崔寅;;基于DEA方法的京津冀城市基础设施投资效率评价[J];干旱区资源与环境;2016年02期
4 孙莹莹;王建伟;;城市群背景下的无锡综合交通基础设施发展研究[J];交通与运输(学术版);2015年02期
5 李玉涛;;京津冀地区基础设施一体化建设研究[J];经济研究参考;2015年02期
6 严盛虎;李宇;董锁成;柳泽;郑吉;;中国城市市政基础设施水平综合评价[J];城市规划;2014年04期
7 张梦心;齐子翔;;京津冀基础设施承载力理论思考及测度评价[J];现代商业;2014年09期
8 宁小莉;王英楠;;人居环境中城市基础设施建设评价——以包头市为例[J];开发研究;2013年06期
9 郑烨;樊蓬;朱敏芝;;城市群基础设施建设的背景、现状与路径——基于长株潭城市群与关中城市群的比较分析[J];商业时代;2012年05期
10 付冷冷;宋敏;刘路;;山东省17地市公共基础设施水平的实证研究[J];山东经济;2011年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前8条
1 李姬;城乡发展一体化背景下的基础设施建设研究[D];华中师范大学;2014年
2 杨牡丹;交通基础设施建设与城市群一体化发展研究[D];华东师范大学;2013年
3 邓京津;荆州城市基础设施建设研究[D];华中师范大学;2013年
4 姜丹;广西北部湾经济区城市群基础设施整合研究[D];广西大学;2012年
5 杨志杰;城市群基础设施政府提供的研究[D];广东商学院;2012年
6 邓昕;陕西省旬邑县城乡一体化基础设施规划初探[D];西安建筑科技大学;2011年
7 尹晓婷;北京市农村基础设施现状与问题研究[D];首都经济贸易大学;2010年
8 刘敏;海淀区城乡基础设施一体化建设研究[D];中央民族大学;2010年
,本文编号:1941009
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjifazhanlunwen/1941009.html