美好集团股权激励三度失败案例研究
[Abstract]:As an incentive mechanism, equity incentive has been applied in foreign countries for a long time. However, in the past decade, with the acceleration of the process of world economic integration and the successful implementation of the reform of the split share structure in China, more and more domestic enterprises have adopted equity incentives in the process of corporate governance in order to unify the interests of senior executives and shareholders. Stabilize the development of the company. However, perhaps because of the influence of the market environment or the enterprises themselves, the effect of the incentive mechanism of equity incentive in Chinese enterprises is not satisfactory. The main content of this paper is the application of equity incentive in the enterprises of our country, but there are many enterprises in our country and the distribution of industries is wide. Therefore, the object of this paper is mainly to take the real estate enterprise beautiful property Group Co., Ltd as an example. Beautiful Group implemented three equity incentive schemes from 2008 to 2014, but the results ended in failure, and the results can be said to be very unsatisfactory. Through in-depth analysis, it is found that there are many reasons for its failure, the main reason is that the unlocking conditions are not reasonable. At the same time, in order to make the article more comparable, this paper introduces Paulie Real Estate 2011 equity incentive plan and the third equity incentive plan of Beautiful Group for comparative analysis. Through the comparative analysis of the two, it is hoped that this kind of analysis suggestion can be used for reference in the future when the enterprises of our country draw up the equity incentive plan. This paper is divided into six chapters, the first part is the introduction, mainly introduces the previous literature and contributions on equity incentives. The second part is the introduction of the three share incentive schemes of Beautiful Group. The third part is the reason analysis of failure. The fourth part is the comparative analysis of the equity incentive of Poly real estate in 2011. The fifth part is a combination of the reasons for the previous failure and Paulie real estate 2011 equity incentive summarized suggestions for improvement. The sixth part is the conclusion part, carries on the summary to the entire article.
【学位授予单位】:安徽工业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F299.233.4;F272.92
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 卢馨;龚启明;郑阳飞;;股权激励契约要素及其影响因素研究[J];山西财经大学学报;2013年04期
2 吕长江;严明珠;郑慧莲;许静静;;为什么上市公司选择股权激励计划?[J];会计研究;2011年01期
3 吕炜;;国内上市公司股权激励“失效”成因及改进途径[J];郑州航空工业管理学院学报;2010年03期
4 吴育辉;吴世农;;企业高管自利行为及其影响因素研究——基于我国上市公司股权激励草案的证据[J];管理世界;2010年05期
5 吴蕾娟;赵汀;陈颖;郝娜娜;;浅析股权激励方案设计[J];黑龙江对外经贸;2010年04期
6 徐宁;徐向艺;;股票期权激励契约合理性及其约束性因素——基于中国上市公司的实证分析[J];中国工业经济;2010年02期
7 肖淑芳;张超;;上市公司股权激励、行权价操纵与送转股[J];管理科学;2009年06期
8 吕长江;郑慧莲;严明珠;许静静;;上市公司股权激励制度设计:是激励还是福利?[J];管理世界;2009年09期
9 黄洁;蔡根女;;股权激励效果和影响因素经验分析——基于两《办法》出台后实施股权激励的上市公司数据[J];华东经济管理;2009年03期
10 李曜;;股票期权与限制性股票股权激励方式的比较研究[J];经济管理;2008年Z3期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 朱宝琛;;去年A股30家公司中止股权激励计划 较前年上升三成[N];证券日报;2013年
2 桂小笋;;逾7成公司回购股票因股权激励对象离职 “金手铐”难挡高管辞职潮[N];证券日报;2012年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 卢雄鹰;中国上市公司股权激励问题研究[D];华东师范大学;2013年
2 张海平;上市公司股权激励效应研究[D];复旦大学;2011年
3 张荣武;财务治理效率论[D];湖南大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前8条
1 祝凯;我国上市公司股权激励方案设计分析[D];暨南大学;2015年
2 张娟;上市公司股权激励行权条件的问题研究[D];财政部财政科学研究所;2013年
3 苏增强;上市公司股权激励实施效果分析[D];北京交通大学;2013年
4 叶妮;上市公司股权激励方案的设计研究[D];暨南大学;2013年
5 周加桂;中国上市公司股权激励效应的研究[D];暨南大学;2012年
6 杨靓;上市公司股权激励研究[D];西南交通大学;2012年
7 杭荣;上市公司高管离职因素分析[D];复旦大学;2012年
8 丁睿;我国上市公司股权激励模式选择探讨[D];苏州大学;2012年
,本文编号:2442774
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjifazhanlunwen/2442774.html