我国工伤保险劳动能力丧失等级待遇研究
[Abstract]:With the development of social economy, the importance of industrial injury insurance in occupational safety is especially prominent, and the treatment of industrial injury is in the core position in the category of industrial injury insurance. The rationality and scientificity of the formulation of the hierarchical treatment for the loss of working ability in industrial injury insurance in China are worth studying deeply. This paper profoundly reveals whether the establishment of the ranking treatment for the loss of labor ability in industrial injury insurance is scientific? If it is not scientific and unreasonable, how should the scientific and reasonable compensation standard for the loss of labor ability in industrial injury insurance be calculated? This paper probes into the causes of the mismatch between the class of industrial injury and the salary by means of presentations and interviews, and finally puts forward how to establish a scientific and reasonable class treatment for the loss of labor ability in industrial injury insurance in China. According to the standard interval of injury insurance treatment and the historical development path of China's industrial injury insurance, this paper formulates a scheme for the grading treatment of the loss of labor ability in China's industrial injury insurance, and finally draws the following conclusions: Firstly, there are unreasonable problems in the policy of China's industrial injury insurance, whether it is long-term disability treatment or one-time treatment. There is an asymmetry between the payment and the disability level, the regional compensation system is fragmented and the compensation level is uneven. The formulation of the disability treatment policy in China's industrial injury insurance is not scientific and reasonable. Secondly, it is theoretically analyzed that the nature of industrial injury is a kind of civil tort, and the liability for industrial injury compensation has experienced the employee's own responsibility and fault. The essence of industrial injury compensation under the framework of social insurance is the result of quota compensation of mutual compromise between labor and management. Comprehensive analysis theoretically deduces that the treatment of disability in industrial injury insurance is essentially equal to the wage value of lost labor capacity. Thirdly, through 128 countries. Or the analysis of the treatment interval of disability in the area of industrial injury insurance, the way of long-term payment of allowance is the mainstream of complete permanent disability treatment, and the calculation model of treatment is: treatment coefficient * treatment base * treatment period = complete permanent disability treatment; the standard of partial permanent disability treatment in foreign industrial injury insurance is mostly a certain proportion. Fourthly, according to the theoretical explanation and deduction, the experience of foreign countries and the historical path of China's industrial injury insurance compensation treatment, the calculating model of the high-middle and low-grade treatment of industrial injury insurance is DT = a * L * w * (t1-t2) + (29-2n) * W. Among them, DT is the treatment of disability, AA is the treatment coefficient of disability, L is the percentage of loss of labor ability or degree of disability l < (75-100%), n < (1,2,3,4,5,6), W is the wage of the local people, T1 is the retirement age, T2 is the disabled age. Fifth, there is an objective inevitability of one-off compensation for the loss of labor ability in China's industrial injury insurance. The treatment for the loss of labor ability in China's industrial injury insurance should be based on the willingness of the disabled to choose the mode of payment. The standard of one-time compensation should be long-term corresponding to the level of disability. The discount of the allowance is consistent.
【学位授予单位】:华东师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F842.616
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 余飞跃;;美国工伤保险制度概述[J];中国医疗保险;2016年01期
2 宋妍;钱永坤;;煤炭企业生产安全的薪酬激励机制研究[J];中国公共安全(学术版);2015年04期
3 余飞跃;吴亚伟;;是否足补与同补:农民工工伤补偿收入替代率及其地区差异研究——以一至四级因工伤残待遇一次性支付标准为例[J];华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2015年06期
4 姜新;加旺能;;一次性工伤医疗补助金的尴尬[J];山东人力资源和社会保障;2015年11期
5 马媛媛;王泰山;曹煜;;待遇调整对工伤保险基金运行的影响[J];中国社会保障;2015年10期
6 刘辉;周慧文;;基于公平视角的农民工职业伤害保障研究[J];中国劳动;2015年16期
7 孟昭环;;一次性工伤医疗补助金对工伤保险基金安全运行影响探析[J];人力资源管理;2015年03期
8 张军;;建筑业农民工参加工伤保险情况分析[J];中国人力资源社会保障;2015年02期
9 何欣;吴蕾;;返乡工伤致残农民工生存状况研究[J];人口研究;2015年01期
10 邓大松;吴菲;熊羽;;农民工职业伤害保障缺失深层因素分析[J];求实;2014年04期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 严其庆;;一次性工伤医疗补助金不应与伤残等级挂钩[N];中国劳动保障报;2015年
2 谢洪;;冷眼看“一次性工伤医疗补助金”[N];中国劳动保障报;2012年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 蔡和平;中德工伤保险法律制度比较研究[D];北京大学;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 金剑;中日工伤保险制度比较研究[D];首都经济贸易大学;2013年
2 王东伟;提高煤炭行业工伤保险赔偿给付水平研究[D];辽宁大学;2012年
3 吴镝;中美工伤保险制度比较[D];华东政法大学;2012年
4 王达光;我国高风险行业工伤社会保险与雇主责任保险互补分析与研究[D];云南大学;2011年
5 张倍铭;论我国工伤补偿法律制度的完善[D];西南大学;2011年
6 李迪;中美工伤保险制度比较研究[D];江苏大学;2010年
7 黄晓波;建筑行业农民工工伤保险研究[D];上海交通大学;2007年
,本文编号:2200541
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/bxjjlw/2200541.html