环境规制对中国工业绿色全要素生产率的影响研究

发布时间：2018-04-16 16:00

本文选题：绿色全要素生产率 + 环境规制强度　；参考：《湖南大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：改革开放以来，我国工业行业的发展得到了巨大的发展，然而在中国工业快速发展的背后是资源的过度消耗以及环境的严重破坏，这两大问题已经成为制约我国经济可持续发展的强大阻力。全要素生产率一般是指经济增长率扣除资本、劳动要素投入的剩余部分，它代表的是经济发展质量的贡献。而绿色全要素生产率则在全要素生产率测算的基础上把环境污染相关指标作为非期望产出纳入到了全要素生产率测算体系中。所以，怎样提高全要素生产率，提升工业经济“质“的内涵是我国实现经济绿色转型，实现可持续发展的关键。本文在已有的研究基础上，采用生产前沿最新的分析工具SBM方向性距离函数和Luenberger生产率指标对绿色全要素生产率进行测算，结果显示VRS假设下，我国工业2000-2011年绿色全要素生产率总值约为4.86%，技术创新是拉动绿色全要素生产率增长的主要因素；东部地区的绿色全要素生产率普遍大于中西部地区。其次，本文从环境规制绩效角度与环境规制体系角度，分别对工业绿色全要素生产率进行回归。从环境规制绩效角度进行回归的结果显示我国一阶环境规制强度对工业绿色全要素生产率的影响系数为负，而二阶系数为正，说明我国环境规制与工业绿色全要素生产率之间的关系呈“U”型，随着环境规制强度的不断增大，环境规制的强度增加将促进工业绿色全要素生产率的增长。为了考察不同环境规制体系对工业绿色全要素生产率的影响，，本文从环境规制的法律体系、方法体系、监督体系、支撑体系中选取代表性的指标对工业绿色全要素生产率进行回归。总体来看，环境信访监督（LP）、环境工业治理投资（INV1）对改善全要素能源效率意义重大；排污费收入（PI）对工业绿色全要素生产率的影响为负，环境执法强度（LAW）、而环保机构人数（EP）、三同时执行环保投资（INV2）等指标的统计显著性较低，对工业绿色全要素生产率的影响不大。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, the development of China's industrial industry has been greatly developed. However, behind the rapid development of Chinese industry are the excessive consumption of resources and the serious damage to the environment.These two problems have become a strong resistance to the sustainable development of our economy.The total factor productivity generally refers to the economic growth rate deducts the capital, the labor factor input surplus part, it represents the economic development quality contribution.On the basis of total factor productivity measurement, green total factor productivity (TFP) takes environmental pollution related indicators as non-expected output into the total factor productivity measurement system.Therefore, how to improve the total factor productivity and the connotation of "quality" of industrial economy is the key to realize the green transformation of economy and realize sustainable development in our country.On the basis of existing research, this paper uses SBM directivity distance function and Luenberger productivity index to measure the green total factor productivity. The results show that under the VRS hypothesis,The total value of green total factor productivity (TFP) of Chinese industry from 2000 to 2011 is about 4.86.The technological innovation is the main factor to promote the growth of green total factor productivity (TFP), and the green TFP in the eastern region is generally larger than that in the central and western regions.Secondly, from the perspective of environmental regulation performance and environmental regulation system, this paper regresses the total factor productivity of industrial green.From the point of view of environmental regulation performance, the results show that the influence coefficient of first-order environmental regulation intensity on industrial green total factor productivity is negative, while the second-order coefficient is positive.It is shown that the relationship between environmental regulation and total factor productivity of industry is of "U" type. With the increasing of environmental regulation intensity, the increase of environmental regulation intensity will promote the growth of industrial green total factor productivity.In order to investigate the influence of different environmental regulation systems on the green total factor productivity of industry, this paper discusses the legal system, method system and supervision system of environmental regulation.The representative indexes in the support system are selected to regress the total factor productivity of industrial green.In general, environmental petition supervision and environmental industrial governance investment (INV1) are of great significance in improving total factor energy efficiency, and the impact of sewage revenue on industrial green total factor productivity is negative.The intensity of environmental law enforcement is weak, while the number of environmental protection agencies is not significant, and the statistical significance of environmental protection investment is low, and the effect on the total factor productivity of industry green is not significant.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：F224;F424;F205

【参考文献】