新能源产业政策效果差异化的财政社会学分析——基于财政补贴的国际循环

发布时间：2018-04-26 20:14

本文选题：财政补贴 + 财政—社会契约　；参考：《社会科学》2015年04期

【摘要】：全球新能源产业的现有格局建立在一种高度差异化的财政政策基础上,中国与发达国家的财政政策配置存在互补性,形成了一种基于财政补贴的国际循环。国内外几乎同时启动的财政政策导致完全不同的产业效果,发达国家处于双赢状态,中国处于双输状态。解决产业危机需要引入一种财政社会学的分析视角,将新能源财政政策作为一个特定领域中的财政—社会契约形成,探究背后的社会结构性和制度性背景。财政政策作为一种理性社会建构过程,受到政策主体行为与偏好的影响。当下,生产型政府对资本的偏好、发展型国家的产业政策、发展主义的经济意识形态、发展模式转型压力,共同形塑出一种政治—社会力量的内在互动机制,影响到财政政策重构的方向。
[Abstract]:The current pattern of the global new energy industry is based on a highly differentiated fiscal policy. The allocation of fiscal policies between China and developed countries is complementary and forms an international cycle based on financial subsidies. The fiscal policies initiated at the same time at home and abroad lead to completely different industrial effects. Developed countries are in a win-win situation and China is in a state of double losses. To solve the industrial crisis, we should introduce a kind of financial sociology analysis angle, take the new energy finance policy as a kind of finance-social contract in a specific field, and explore the social structure and institutional background behind it. As a rational social construction process, fiscal policy is influenced by the behavior and preference of the policy subject. At present, the preference of production-oriented government for capital, the industrial policy of developing countries, the economic ideology of developmentalism, the pressure of transformation of development models, together form a kind of internal interaction mechanism of political-social forces. Affect the direction of fiscal policy reconstruction.
【作者单位】：上海财经大学人文学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“财政政策、国家治理与战略性新兴产业成长:基于财政社会学的分析”(项目编号:14YJC840032)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：F426.2;F812.45

【参考文献】