什么影响了中国工业行业生产率差异度的变化？
发布时间：2018-07-15 14:13
【摘要】：生产率这一指标在宏观上反映了一个国家的生产力发展水平,在微观上则反映了单个企业的生产效率。随着微观层面异质性企业理论的出现和相关测算的计量方法的进步,近年对生产率的研究逐渐由宏观层面转向微观层面,并逐步扩展至结构性研究。行业内生产率差异度体现了同一行业内高生产率企业和低生产率企业的生产率结构,这一结构能够反映行业发展水平。通过研究行业生产率结构对具体行业所处发展阶段的判断,有利于跨国间的横向比较。微观层面的生产率结构研究对中观和宏观层面制定相应的产业政策也具有重要的参考意义。本文使用1998-2007年中国微观工业企业数据库,在使用半参数估计方法估计企业生产率的基础上,对中国制造业行业内的生产率差异度进行了测算,并与日本制造业企业的数据进行对比。同时本文使用数据库中企业性质、出口额等数据对影响生产率差异度的因素进行了实证检验。本文的主要结论是在1998到2007年间,中国的制造业企业行业内生产率差异度是逐渐下降的,但生产率差异度的行业均值高过日本。从影响因素看,行业集中度对行业生产率差异度有显著的负向影响,行业对外开放度有显著的负向影响,国企密度有显著的正向影响,新技术的应用的影响并不显著。
[Abstract]:The index of productivity reflects the level of productivity development in a country macroscopically and the productivity efficiency of a single enterprise in micro level. With the emergence of microcosmic heterogeneous firm theory and the improvement of measurement methods, the research on productivity has gradually changed from macro level to micro level and extended to structural research in recent years. The productivity difference in industry reflects the productivity structure of high productivity enterprises and low productivity enterprises in the same industry, and this structure can reflect the level of industry development. It is beneficial to the horizontal comparison among countries by studying the industry productivity structure to judge the development stage of specific industries. The study on the productivity structure at the micro level is also of great significance for the establishment of corresponding industrial policies at the meso and macro levels. In this paper, using the database of China's micro industrial enterprises from 1998 to 2007, based on the semi-parametric estimation method to estimate the productivity of enterprises, the difference of productivity in the manufacturing industry of China is measured. And compared with the data of Japanese manufacturing enterprises. At the same time, using the data of enterprise nature and export value in the database, this paper makes an empirical test on the factors that affect the productivity difference. The main conclusion of this paper is that between 1998 and 2007, the productivity difference of manufacturing enterprises in China is decreasing gradually, but the industry average of productivity difference is higher than that of Japan. From the point of view of the influencing factors, the industry concentration has a significant negative effect on the industry productivity difference, the industry openness has a significant negative influence, the density of state-owned enterprises has a significant positive impact, and the application of new technology has no significant impact.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：F424
本文编号：2124341
[Abstract]:The index of productivity reflects the level of productivity development in a country macroscopically and the productivity efficiency of a single enterprise in micro level. With the emergence of microcosmic heterogeneous firm theory and the improvement of measurement methods, the research on productivity has gradually changed from macro level to micro level and extended to structural research in recent years. The productivity difference in industry reflects the productivity structure of high productivity enterprises and low productivity enterprises in the same industry, and this structure can reflect the level of industry development. It is beneficial to the horizontal comparison among countries by studying the industry productivity structure to judge the development stage of specific industries. The study on the productivity structure at the micro level is also of great significance for the establishment of corresponding industrial policies at the meso and macro levels. In this paper, using the database of China's micro industrial enterprises from 1998 to 2007, based on the semi-parametric estimation method to estimate the productivity of enterprises, the difference of productivity in the manufacturing industry of China is measured. And compared with the data of Japanese manufacturing enterprises. At the same time, using the data of enterprise nature and export value in the database, this paper makes an empirical test on the factors that affect the productivity difference. The main conclusion of this paper is that between 1998 and 2007, the productivity difference of manufacturing enterprises in China is decreasing gradually, but the industry average of productivity difference is higher than that of Japan. From the point of view of the influencing factors, the industry concentration has a significant negative effect on the industry productivity difference, the industry openness has a significant negative influence, the density of state-owned enterprises has a significant positive impact, and the application of new technology has no significant impact.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：F424
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 颜鹏飞,王兵;技术效率、技术进步与生产率增长:基于DEA的实证分析[J];经济研究;2004年12期
，本文编号：2124341
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/gongyejingjilunwen/2124341.html
