民营钢铁企业合法性危机后的自我修复与政府作为

发布时间：2019-03-01 10:10

【摘要】：本文通过分析三家民营钢铁企业合法性危机后政府参与解决合法性危机的过程,重点考察了实践中政府对民营企业的态度和行为,以及民营企业为争取自身利益而采取的行动。研究发现,民营企业的合法性还是远远低于国有企业的合法性,当双方利益发生冲突时,政府保护的往往是国有企业;地方政府在处理民营企业的合法性危机时,更偏爱采用行政手段而不是司法手段;随着政府法治水平的提高,在多种制度相互约束的情况下,民营企业利用法律手段维护自身权益的可能性和效果在提高。在政府积极推进国有企业混合所有制改革的背景下,这一研究对于民营企业如何保护自身权益,对于政府部门如何调动民营企业参与改革的积极性有一定的启示作用。
[Abstract]:By analyzing the process of the government participating in solving the legitimacy crisis after the legitimacy crisis of the three private iron and steel enterprises, this paper mainly examines the attitude and behavior of the government to the private enterprises in practice, and the actions taken by the private enterprises to strive for their own interests. It is found that the legitimacy of private enterprises is much lower than that of state-owned enterprises. When the interests of both sides conflict, the government often protects the state-owned enterprises. When dealing with the crisis of legality of private enterprises, local governments prefer to adopt administrative means rather than judicial means; With the improvement of the level of government rule of law, the possibility and effect of private enterprises using legal means to protect their rights and interests are improving under the condition of mutual restriction of various systems. Under the background that the government actively promotes the reform of the mixed ownership of the state-owned enterprises, this study has some enlightening effect on how to protect the rights and interests of the private enterprises and how the government departments to mobilize the enthusiasm of the private enterprises to participate in the reform.
【作者单位】：华东理工大学商学院;
【基金】：上海市教育委员会科研创新项目“企业私下战略行动与竞争优势的关系研究”(12ZS050) 国家社会科学基金项目“我国企业进入海外市场遭遇合法性危机的机理及对策研究”(13BGL018)
【分类号】：F426.31;F272.3;D630

【参考文献】