中国和印度利用外商直接投资对产业结构影响的比较研究
发布时间:2018-03-25 06:36
本文选题:中国 切入点:印度 出处:《河北经贸大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:外商直接投资是促进各国经济发展的主要动力之一,特别是对于资金短缺的发展中国家来说尤为重要。作为两个相邻国家,中国和印度在经济发展基础、人口以及国家综合发展状况方面都有许多相似之处。两国同是发展中大国,也同为新兴市场和金砖国家。近年来两国经济均得到快速发展,其中外商直接投资对经济的贡献度都很大。到2012年,我国实际使用外资远远超过印度达到1117.16亿美元,成为世界上利用外资最多的发展中国家。从中国和印度利用外商直接投资的规模来看,印度利用外资无论从流量角度还是存量角度都远远少于中国,2012年印度外商直接投资的流入量仅仅是中国的8%;截止到2012年,印度吸引外资的存量也只是中国的6%。而我国利用外商投资的效果与印度比较如何?特别是中国和印度利用外商直接投资对产业结构产生了怎样的影响?本文通过比较中国和印度利用外商直接投资对产业结构影响的差别,发现我国在利用外商直接投资方面的不足之处,从而为我国更加合理得利用外资、提高利用外资效果提供可以借鉴的经验。 论文在研究了国内外相关理论的前提下,首先对中、印两国利用外商直接投资特点和中、印两国产业结构的现状进行了对比分析。然后,,通过规范分析和实证分析相结合的方法进一步研究了中、印两国利用外商直接投资对产业结构影响的差别。最后,在前面研究的基础上,可以看出中国的外商直接投资在规模上远远高于印度,外商直接投资对中国产业结构的调整也起到一定的促进作用,但是,印度利用外商直接投资对其产业结构的调整尤其是对第三产业的促进明显优于中国,从而对我国利用外资产生一些启示,也为我国在利用外资方面提供了值得借鉴的经验。 文章第一部分为引言部分,这一部分主要介绍了本文的研究背景和研究意义,以及国内外研究现状;第二部分主要叙述了关于外商直接投资和产业结构的相关理论依据,包括产品周期理论、垄断优势理论、市场内部化理论等,以及外商直接投资对产业结构调整的影响机制。第三部分主要比较了中国和印度外商直接投资的特点和产业结构的现状;本文的第四部分对外商直接投资对中国和印度产业结构的调整进行了比较分析;第五部分通过实证分析比较了中印两国利用外商直接投资对其产业结构的影响;第六部分通过比较研究以及实证分析所得出的结论,归纳出我国在利用外资方面的总体思路以及应该采取的有效对策。
[Abstract]:Foreign direct investment (FDI) is one of the main drivers of economic development in various countries, especially for developing countries with shortage of capital. As two neighboring countries, China and India are on the basis of economic development. There are many similarities in terms of population and the overall state of national development. Both countries are large developing countries, as well as emerging markets and BRICS countries. Both countries have enjoyed rapid economic growth in recent years. The contribution of foreign direct investment to the economy is very great. By 2012, China's actual use of foreign capital far exceeded that of India to 111.716 billion US dollars. To become the developing country with the largest use of foreign capital in the world. Judging from the scale of foreign direct investment used by China and India, India's utilization of foreign capital is far less than that of China in terms of both flow and stock. In 2012, the inflow of Indian foreign direct investment was only 8 percent of that of China; by 2012, India's stock of attracting foreign investment is only 6% of China's. How does the effect of using foreign investment in China compare with that of India? In particular, how does China and India make use of foreign direct investment (FDI) to influence the industrial structure? By comparing the influence of foreign direct investment on industrial structure between China and India, this paper finds out the inadequacies of using foreign direct investment in China, so as to make more reasonable use of foreign capital in China. Improve the effect of foreign investment use to provide lessons for reference. On the premise of studying the relevant theories at home and abroad, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the industrial structure of China and India by using the characteristics of foreign direct investment and the industrial structure of China and India. Through the combination of normative analysis and empirical analysis, this paper further studies the differences between China and India on the impact of FDI on industrial structure. Finally, on the basis of previous studies, We can see that the scale of China's foreign direct investment is far higher than that of India. Foreign direct investment also plays a certain role in promoting the adjustment of China's industrial structure, but, The adjustment of India's industrial structure by using foreign direct investment, especially the promotion of the tertiary industry, is obviously superior to that of China, which brings some enlightenment to our country's utilization of foreign capital, and also provides our country with valuable experience in utilizing foreign capital. The first part of the article is the introduction part, this part mainly introduces the research background and significance of this paper, as well as the domestic and foreign research status quo, the second part mainly describes the related theoretical basis of foreign direct investment and industrial structure. Including product cycle theory, monopoly advantage theory, market internalization theory, etc. The third part mainly compares the characteristics of FDI in China and India and the current situation of industrial structure. The fourth part of this paper makes a comparative analysis on the adjustment of industrial structure of China and India by foreign direct investment, the fifth part compares the impact of foreign direct investment on the industrial structure of China and India through empirical analysis. In the sixth part, through comparative study and empirical analysis, the author concludes the general ideas and effective countermeasures of utilizing foreign capital in China.
【学位授予单位】:河北经贸大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:F832.6;F124
【引证文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 蒋磊;金砖五国外商直接投资对经济增长影响的比较研究[D];江苏大学;2016年
本文编号:1661968
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/guojijinrong/1661968.html