中美国际贸易制度之争——基于国际公共产品提供的视角

发布时间：2018-01-18 15:31

本文关键词：中美国际贸易制度之争——基于国际公共产品提供的视角　出处：《世界经济与政治》2016年10期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：制度是非中性的,作为国际公共产品的国际贸易制度同样具有非中性特征。二战以后,国际贸易制度长期以来主要由美国通过霸权以国际公共产品的形式来提供,并反映美国的利益诉求。20世纪80年代以来,特别是21世纪以来,随着国际经贸格局的变迁,中美两国的经贸实力发生了巨大变化,进而两国主导国际贸易制度的能力和意愿也发生了重要转变。美国提供全球性国际贸易公共产品的能力和意愿不断下降;中国的意愿和能力虽逐步提升,但未能在全球领域填补相应的空白。在此背景下,美国逐渐转向提供成本较低的区域性公共产品,且其明显针对中国的战略使中美国际贸易制度之争的重点由全球转向区域,并进入相持阶段。未来,随着经济贸易国际地位的提升,在国际贸易领域,无论是在全球层面还是区域层面,中国不可避免地需要为国际公共产品提供承担更多的责任和更大的成本,当务之急是要切实提高国际公共产品的提供能力。
[Abstract]:The system is non-neutral, and the international trade system, as an international public product, is also non-neutral. The international trade system has long been mainly provided by the United States through hegemony in the form of international public goods, and reflects the interests of the United States since 80s, especially since 21th century. With the change of international economic and trade pattern, great changes have taken place in the economic and trade strength of China and the United States. Furthermore, the ability and willingness of the two countries to lead the international trade system has also undergone an important transformation. The ability and willingness of the United States to provide global international trade public goods has been declining; China's willingness and capabilities have grown, but it has failed to fill the gaps in the global arena. Against this backdrop, the US has gradually shifted to the provision of low-cost regional public goods. And its obvious strategy for China makes the focus of the Sino-American international trade system from the global to the regional, and into a phase of stalemate. In the future, with the promotion of the international status of economic and trade, in the field of international trade. Whether at the global or regional level, China inevitably needs to bear more responsibilities and higher costs for international public goods.
【作者单位】：对外经济贸易大学中国WTO研究院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“国际经贸规则演变与我国自由贸易区战略实施研究”(项目编号:16BGJ002) 对外经济贸易大学中央高校基本科研业务专项资金资助(项目编号:15YQ04) 国家留学基金资助(项目编号:201506640023)阶段性成果
【分类号】：F757.12;F752
【正文快照】： 第二次世界大战结束后,作为这场战争最大获益者的美国取得了空前的霸权地位,并凭借其霸权地位主导推动了世界政治体制(联合国)和世界经济体制(国际货币基金组织、世界银行、关税与贸易总协定)的建立,向全球提供国际公共产品。然而,进入21世纪以来,随着中国加入世界贸易组织(WT

【相似文献】