中印承接服务外包国际竞争力比较研究
发布时间:2018-05-08 15:30
本文选题:中国 + 印度 ; 参考:《哈尔滨商业大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:随着全球经济的发展,世界服务贸易的发展速度已远远超过了商品贸易的发展速度,其中增长最迅速的是服务外包。外包已经成为一个全球趋势,越来越多的企业为了集中内部优势资源发展核心业务,通过整合利用企业外部优势资源的方式而将非核心业务外包出去,以此达到降低成本,提高绩效,提升企业核心竞争力的目的。中国和印度是世界主要的接包国,印度在承接服务外包方面取得了骄人的成绩,是全球服务外包行业的标志,自20世纪90年代以来一直引领着全球服务外包的发展趋势。中国和印度同为发展中国家有很多相似之处,但在承接服务外包方面中国和印度相比仍有很大差距。 论文以中印承接服务外包国际竞争力比较为研究对象,结合国内外已有的相关研究成果及国际贸易相关理论,对中印承接服务外包的现状进行分析,从定性和定量两方面对中印承接服务外包的国际竞争力进行比较研究,定性分析利用修正后的“钻石模型”,探讨以政府为核心的影响中印两国服务外包竞争力的各因子及其经济含义。在生产要素方面,中国的基础设施和人力资源有较大优势,而印度则在地理位置和服务外包行业协会发展等方面具有较大优势。在需求条件方面,中国的国内市场具有较大的发展潜力。在相关产业与支持产业方面,中国具有基础雄厚的制造业和较为完善的物流系统,印度则在信息技术和金融业体制等方面更具优势。在企业战略方面,印度服务外包的企业规模和开发能力,以及形成的品牌效应都远远超过中国,在服务外包产业园区的规划和建设方面,也具有较大优势。在机会方面,印度的成本优势在逐渐减弱,中国在欧美和日韩市场将会有更大的发展空间。在政府方面,为推进服务外包的发展中印两国政府都积极制定相关政策加大发展力度。定量分析主要是通过引入国际市场占有率指数(MS)、显示性比较优势指数(RCA)和贸易竞争优势指数(TCI)来说明中印承接服务外包的竞争力。研究结果显示目前印度在承接服务外包业务整体上具有比较优势,而在中印两国承接服务外包的竞争力方面,印度要优于中国。论文最后在借鉴印度承接服务外包的经验的基础上提出提升中国承接服务外包国际竞争力的对策。
[Abstract]:With the development of global economy, the speed of the development of world trade in services has far exceeded the speed of the development of commodity trade, among which the fastest growth is the outsourcing of services. Outsourcing has become a global trend. In order to concentrate internal advantage resources and develop core business, more and more enterprises outsource non-core business in order to reduce costs by integrating and utilizing external advantage resources. To improve performance and enhance the core competitiveness of enterprises. China and India are the major contracting countries in the world. India has made remarkable achievements in service outsourcing and is the symbol of the global service outsourcing industry. It has been leading the development trend of global service outsourcing since 1990s. China and India share many similarities as developing countries, but there is still a big gap between China and India in outsourcing services. This paper takes the international competitiveness comparison between China and India to undertake service outsourcing as the research object, and analyzes the current situation of service outsourcing in China and India, combining with the existing research results and international trade related theories at home and abroad. From qualitative and quantitative aspects, this paper makes a comparative study on the international competitiveness of China and India to undertake service outsourcing, and qualitatively analyzes and uses the revised Diamond Model. This paper probes into the factors and economic implications of the government's influence on the competitiveness of service outsourcing between China and India. In terms of factors of production, China has great advantages in infrastructure and human resources, while India has great advantages in geographical location and development of service outsourcing industry associations. In terms of demand conditions, China's domestic market has greater development potential. In terms of related industries and supporting industries, China has a solid manufacturing industry and a relatively perfect logistics system, while India has more advantages in information technology and financial system. In terms of enterprise strategy, the scale, development ability and brand effect of service outsourcing in India are far more than those in China, and they also have great advantages in the planning and construction of service outsourcing industrial parks. On the opportunity side, India's cost advantage is waning, and China will have more room for growth in Europe, America and Japan and South Korea. On the government side, both China and India actively formulate relevant policies to promote the development of service outsourcing. The quantitative analysis mainly explains the competitiveness of service outsourcing between China and India by introducing international market share index (MSI), indicative comparative advantage index (RCA) and trade competitive advantage index (TCII). The results show that India has a comparative advantage in the service outsourcing business as a whole, and India is superior to China in the competitiveness of service outsourcing between China and India. Finally, based on the experience of India to undertake service outsourcing, the paper puts forward some countermeasures to enhance the international competitiveness of China to undertake service outsourcing.
【学位授予单位】:哈尔滨商业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:F752.68;F753.51
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 阙澄宇;柴渊哲;;中印承接国际服务外包竞争力比较研究[J];财经问题研究;2010年08期
2 吕延方;赵进文;;中国承接服务外包影响因素分析——基于多国面板数据的实证检验[J];财贸经济;2010年07期
3 于立新;陈昭;江皎;;中国服务外包产业竞争力研究——基于部分试点城市的分析[J];财贸经济;2010年09期
4 赵枫;;软件和服务外包产业竞争力影响因素分析[J];电脑知识与技术;2011年31期
5 王泽利;周升起;;中印两国IT服务外包国际竞争力比较研究[J];北方经贸;2009年09期
6 段晓丹;;中印两国发展服务外包的比较分析[J];改革与开放;2009年05期
7 王晓红;;实现服务外包产业的跨越发展与整体提升[J];国际贸易;2010年10期
8 吴国新;高长春;;服务外包理论演进研究综述[J];国际商务研究;2008年02期
9 孙晓琴;;我国服务外包城市竞争力评价研究[J];国际经贸探索;2008年07期
10 胡昭玲;王洋;;中国承接服务外包的影响因素分析[J];国际经贸探索;2010年02期
,本文编号:1861956
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/guojimaoyilunwen/1861956.html