福建省与广东、浙江省出口竞争力比较研究
发布时间:2018-06-07 13:41
本文选题:出口竞争力 + 福建 ; 参考:《云南大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:改革开放以来,广东、浙江、福建三省出口贸易取得了飞速的发展,目前这三个省已经都是中国的出口大省,出口所占份额占全国出口的很大比例。但相比于广东和浙江,福建省在出口方面却要落后许多。本文比较了广东、浙江、福建三个省出口贸易现状,包括出口贸易规模、贸易主体、贸易方式、出口产品以及出口发展平衡度五个方面。并通过波特国家竞争优势理论(钻石模型)对三个省的四个基本要素以及两个辅助要素进行分析,对比各自的发展特点,研究广东和浙江在出口贸易的优势,找出福建省在出口贸易方面落后于广东与浙江的原因。最后在借鉴广东省和浙江省各自发展出口贸易的成功经验基础上,提出提升福建出口竞争力的建议。 本文在总结了相关贸易理论和已有的研究文献的基础上,使用图表分析、比较分析、实证分析、钻石模型分析以及案例分析等多种研究方法。通过对三个省的出口规模、出口主体、出口贸易方式、出口产品结构、出口发展平衡度五个方面进行比较,发现三个省都有各自的特点。广东省是中国第一出口大省,以外资企业为主要出口主体,加工贸易为主,出口产品的科技含量高;而浙江省的出口企业则是以民营企业为主,一般贸易居多,产品科技含量较低;福建省则处于比较平衡的情况,出口主体中,外资企业与民营企业均占有较大比例,一般贸易和加工贸易业发展比较平衡,但是都不是很发达。其次三个省中以浙江省各市出口贸易发展比较平衡,福建和广东出口发展的很不平衡。然后通过实证分析证明了出口与钻石模型中各因素的关系比较显著。最后用钻石模型,对比分析了广东、浙江和福建出口贸易中的生产要素、需求条件、相关与支持性产业、企业以及政府与机遇。分析表明了福建在其中大多数方面都是落后的。最后还通过闽台贸易这个案例更清晰的说明福建的不足之处。 广东、浙江在出口贸易方面取得了成功,有其必然原因。福建省要充分借鉴这两个省成功的经验。福建省要尽量提高出口产品的附加值、把吸引外资企业(特别是台资企业)和引进高端技术有机结合起来、充分发挥内陆城市的能动性、完善与出口相配套的基础设施、改变政府职能,提高福建省出口竞争力。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, the export trade of Guangdong, Zhejiang and Fujian provinces has made rapid development. At present, these three provinces have all been the major export provinces of China, and the share of export accounts for a large proportion of the national export. But compared with Guangdong and Zhejiang, Fujian Province lags far behind in exports. This paper compares the current situation of export trade in Guangdong, Zhejiang and Fujian provinces, including five aspects: the scale of export trade, the main body of trade, the way of trade, the export products and the balance of export development. Through the analysis of the four basic elements and the two auxiliary factors of the three provinces through the theory of the competitive advantage of the Porter countries (diamond model), this paper compares the development characteristics of the three provinces, and studies the advantages of Guangdong and Zhejiang in the export trade. Find out why Fujian lags behind Guangdong and Zhejiang in export trade. Finally, based on the successful experiences of Guangdong province and Zhejiang province in developing export trade, some suggestions are put forward to enhance Fujian's export competitiveness. On the basis of summarizing relevant trade theory and existing research literature, this paper uses many research methods, such as chart analysis, comparative analysis, empirical analysis, diamond model analysis and case analysis. By comparing the export scale, the main body of export, the mode of export trade, the structure of export products and the balance of export development of the three provinces, it is found that the three provinces have their own characteristics. Guangdong Province is the largest export province in China, with foreign-funded enterprises as the main export body, processing trade as the main body, and high scientific and technological content of export products, while the export enterprises in Zhejiang Province are mainly private enterprises, with the majority of the general trade. The content of product science and technology is relatively low, Fujian Province is in a relatively balanced situation, in the main export, foreign-funded enterprises and private enterprises account for a large proportion, general trade and processing trade development is more balanced, but not very developed. In the next three provinces, the export trade of Zhejiang Province is relatively balanced, and that of Fujian and Guangdong is unbalanced. Then it is proved by empirical analysis that the relationship between export and each factor in diamond model is significant. Finally, the diamond model is used to analyze the factors of production, demand conditions, related and supportive industries, enterprises, governments and opportunities in export trade of Guangdong, Zhejiang and Fujian. The analysis shows that Fujian is backward in most of them. Finally, through Fujian-Taiwan trade this case more clearly explains the shortcomings of Fujian. Guangdong, Zhejiang in export trade has been successful, there are inevitable reasons. Fujian Province should draw lessons from the successful experience of these two provinces. Fujian should try its best to increase the added value of its export products, combine attracting foreign-funded enterprises (especially Taiwan-funded enterprises) with the introduction of high-end technology, give full play to the dynamic role of inland cities, and improve infrastructure matching with exports. Change government function, raise Fujian province export competition ability.
【学位授予单位】:云南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:F752.62
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李尚峰;;江苏国际服务贸易竞争力评析[J];商业研究;2008年10期
2 张烨;王雅城;胡文浩;;稳定与发展福建出口市场的现实思考[J];福建论坛(人文社会科学版);2009年06期
3 刘双明;;从四地统计数字的比较看福建发展[J];发展研究;2006年06期
4 张昱;;广东省外贸竞争力评析[J];国际贸易问题;2006年01期
5 陈俊艺;许彩玲;;粤、浙、苏、闽四省外贸发展比较及对福建的启示[J];福建论坛(人文社会科学版);2009年06期
6 余建铭;;福建与东部沿海四省2013年外贸进口比较研究[J];北方经贸;2014年05期
7 戴桂林;袁铀升;;钻石模型视角下青岛市对外贸易竞争力分析[J];黑龙江对外经贸;2010年02期
8 管豪;;福建与浙江民营经济发展比较分析[J];经济师;2009年02期
9 王跃华;;浙江省外贸竞争力和要素对出口影响的实证分析[J];经济研究导刊;2012年16期
10 刘春梅;;从浙江与广东省的比较分析看浙江省的外贸出口竞争力[J];开发研究;2010年01期
,本文编号:1991364
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/guojimaoyilunwen/1991364.html