民营养老机构监管问题研究
[Abstract]:China has entered an aging society. Pension institutions, especially private pension institutions, play an indispensable role in meeting the needs of the elderly, such as the elderly, disabled, and mentally retarded. However, the frequent occurrence of various malignant events in recent years shows that there are still many loopholes in the supervision of private pension institutions, which infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of the elderly and restricts the development of private pension institutions. This paper first defines the concept and nature of private pension institutions, combs the existing legal system of private pension institutions, introduces the current development and supervision of private pension institutions, on the basis of this, combined with a case study, This paper analyzes some problems existing in the supervision of private pension institutions, such as inadequate legal protection, government supervision and social supervision. The dual supervision of for-profit and non-profit private pension institutions inhibits the enthusiasm of social investment. Supervision focuses on prevention and punishment in advance, incentive supervision policy is not in place and information supervision is missing. The reasons for this series of regulatory problems are various. From the perspective of public power, there are mainly "policy-oriented" means of governing the country, the social welfare regulatory system is not good, and there is a lack of classified management and evaluation system. From the perspective of private pension institutions, the government mainly has insufficient operating funds, outdated management and service concepts, and so on. The government's "undone" supervision concept and supporting policies to support the development of private pension institutions are not perfect, and from the perspective of private pension institutions, there are mainly inadequate operating funds, obsolete management and service concepts, and so on. The imperfect management system and unreasonable initial positioning; the weak legal awareness of the elderly and their families is also a factor in the frequent occurrence of regulatory problems; from the point of view of social support, traditional filial piety, The prejudice of the society to the private pension institutions and their nursing workers and the lack of the sense of supervision of the masters are all the unfavorable factors to the development of the private pension institutions. In combination with advanced international experience, our country should clarify the legal basis as soon as possible, improve the operability of the law, establish a cooperative supervision mechanism based on government supervision, and endow the civil administration departments with the leading power in the supervision of private pension institutions. Forming the joint efforts of various departments on the basis of the leadership of the civil affairs departments, and at the same time focusing on the establishment of a supervisory mechanism for the regulators, the direction of supervision should be innovated, and the nature of private pension institutions should be rationally positioned. It is necessary to set up government incentives on the basis of perfect classified management system, regular inspection and evaluation system and information disclosure system, abandon the idea of "repairing the lost sheep" type of supervision, attach importance to the admission supervision and daily supervision of private pension institutions. And at the same time, we should pay attention to filling gaps and improving the relevant systems. In addition, we should create an external environment conducive to the development of private pension institutions, and innovate and implement policies on financing, land and talents of private pension institutions. Establish the national long-term care insurance system as soon as possible, increase pension publicity, and introduce a fixed contingent of volunteers to provide voluntary services on a regular basis, so that private pension institutions and the elderly to establish long-term and effective contact with the outside world.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F719;D669.6
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 谢恒,马伯东;机构投资者的行为特征与我国机构投资的发展[J];理论与改革;2002年05期
2 郭婷;陈未希;;浅谈机构投资者参与公司治理[J];法制与社会;2008年23期
3 杜爱霞;;法律规制下机构投资者参与公司治理的可行性研究[J];河南广播电视大学学报;2011年03期
4 王芳;卢琼;胡爱萍;;机构投资者:公司治理中的有效监督者[J];法制与社会;2006年16期
5 鲁汶;傅建武;王学斌;邓明露;;中国资产证券市场上金融(中介)机构的从业风险与对策[J];金融法苑;2005年11期
6 裘有度;;机构投资者参与公司治理法律问题探析[J];法制与社会;2007年03期
7 ;观点摘编[J];领导决策信息;2001年22期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 曾振;张俊瑞;于忠泊;;机构投资者能减少应计异象吗?[A];中国会计学会2011学术年会论文集[C];2011年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 安宁;中外机构投资动向暗示A股投资机会来临[N];证券日报;2012年
2 本报记者 金水;美国富达转向亚洲机构投资市场[N];华夏时报;2012年
3 记者 陆璐;我市民办托老养老机构投资超1000万元[N];大庆日报;2009年
4 本报记者 潘绍俊;新三板成机构投资“新大陆”[N];东莞日报;2012年
5 本报记者 黄莹颖;海外机构投资A股迷踪拳[N];中国证券报;2013年
6 北京市老龄协会;北京社会办养老机构调查[N];中国老年报;2003年
7 记者 吴黎华;机构投资人将逐渐替代国资委功能[N];经济参考报;2010年
8 本报记者 顾鑫;美团网获阿里巴巴等机构投资[N];中国证券报;2011年
9 乔新生;全流通后机构投资者何去何从[N];中国保险报;2005年
10 胡振齐;中国机构投资者的构成分析(上)[N];人民日报海外版;2002年
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 万俊毅;机构投资股东:理论、实践与政策研究[D];暨南大学;2004年
2 郎唯群;机构投资者与公司治理[D];华东师范大学;2003年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 王尚忠;机构投资者对分级基金的套利机制及其效应研究[D];郑州大学;2015年
2 张颖;机构投资者持股与上市公司盈余管理关系研究[D];西安工业大学;2015年
3 李娜;不同类型的机构投资者与公司绩效的关系研究[D];河南师范大学;2015年
4 曹中华;机构投资者持股对上市公司绩效的影响研究[D];上海大学;2015年
5 李贞贞;机构投资者参与公司治理法律问题研究[D];华中师范大学;2015年
6 李乐成;机构投资者参与公司治理的法律问题研究[D];北京化工大学;2015年
7 陈伟;机构投资者持股与企业社会责任关系实证研究[D];成都理工大学;2015年
8 胡蕴;机构投资者类型与公司业绩关系的实证研究[D];江西财经大学;2015年
9 林泉;机构投资者真正起到治理作用了吗?[D];浙江工商大学;2015年
10 闫雪;机构投资者持股比例对企业社会责任绩效影响的实证研究[D];东北大学;2014年
,本文编号:2166197
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/guojimaoyilunwen/2166197.html