C2C电子商务交易主体信誉评估模型研究
[Abstract]:E-commerce has come into being with the rapid development of Internet and information technology, and has experienced the process of sprout, exploration and gradual expansion, which has developed rapidly all over the world. With the concept of "Internet" put forward, the economic development of "e-commerce" has become increasingly obvious, e-commerce has penetrated into all aspects of different industries. C2C model as one of the most important model of e-commerce, The traditional face to face consumption mode of transaction entity has been changed, but because of the characteristics of asymmetric information among different entities, there are certain risks in the transaction. Mutual trust between trading entities is the prerequisite for both parties to reach a transaction. However, with the development of C2C electronic commerce, a large number of "fraudulent" trading entities have emerged, and the credit problem has become the bottleneck of its sustainable development. How to construct C-2 C e-commerce credit evaluation system is concerned by business circles and scholars. In order to reduce the transaction risk between entities, improve the transaction efficiency of both parties, and promote the healthy development of C2C e-commerce, this paper sets up a credit evaluation model to evaluate the credit of buyers and sellers in all directions and accurately from the perspective of creating an honest trading environment. The main work includes the following three parts: the first part, introduces the C2C e-commerce reputation related theory and the trading subject reputation formation mechanism, summarizes and analyzes the existing trading subject reputation evaluation mechanism and model. This paper focuses on the credit evaluation mechanism of the improved way and the principles of the establishment of the model. The second part, according to the C2C e-commerce website transaction flow, from the initial registration, transaction goods and returned goods to the buyer and seller credit evaluation study, respectively, build evaluation buy, seller initial reputation, The weighted model of transaction reputation, return credit and comprehensive reputation. Deeply analyze the dynamic utility of transaction value utility factor, feedback evaluation accuracy utility factor, time utility factor and return rate utility factor in evaluating buyer's reputation. This paper focuses on the dynamic utility of transaction value utility factor, reliability utility factor, time utility factor and return rate utility factor when evaluating seller's reputation. The third part simulates the trading environment and verifies the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed model by numerical examples. The experiment shows that, in this paper, the seller's reputation evaluation model can make up for the deficiency of traditional reputation evaluation model which can not evaluate the initial reputation of the trading body, and the reputation value of the seller in different periods can also be compared. And has better credit differentiation ability; The dynamic value of buyer's reputation can effectively identify the types of fraud taken by non-honest buyers, and the seller's reputation evaluation model has strong ability in preventing "reputation fraud", "credit collusion" and "reputation denigration".
【学位授予单位】:内蒙古大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:F724.6
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈荣章;马志强;;基于多属性态度模型的二手车交易主体分析[J];北京汽车;2012年03期
2 张亦春;孙君明;;限售股解禁下A股市场各交易主体行为分析与市场对策研究[J];经济学动态;2008年07期
3 吴怀福;陈英箱;;网络交易主体登记管理探索[J];中国工商管理研究;2010年09期
4 王福蕊;李南;;略论短线交易主体[J];时代金融;2013年32期
5 沈立群;;产权经纪机构要规范执业[J];上海国资;2006年04期
6 胡维佳;徐婷婷;吴晓光;张华;;两会好声音[J];中国经济周刊;2014年10期
7 于建忠;;交易主体同质效应对债券定价的影响[J];中国货币市场;2008年05期
8 陈志武;;从金融大国到金融强国[J];商界(评论);2009年12期
9 刘明;不良经济信用产生的四个原因[J];发展研究;2003年12期
10 张珊珊;徐建雪;王育才;;排污权的法律性质定位及其对交易主体的利益保护[J];商业时代;2012年03期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 林奕藩;;工商海上监管的探索[A];实践与思考——二OO四学会文集[C];2004年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 马龙生;农民应成为土地交易主体[N];证券时报;2012年
2 王斌;郑棉期市交易主体分析[N];期货日报;2005年
3 中国石油大学能源专家 郭庆方;油价预期中的真真假假[N];中国石油报;2009年
4 本报记者 毛建宇;加强信用评级建设和交易主体监控[N];中国证券报;2013年
5 本报记者 钮键军;外汇交易主体扩容 外贸公司慎观其变[N];财经时报;2004年
6 石新中;构建维护诚信的法律体系[N];人民日报;2013年
7 记者 唐颖豪;沪交易主体转向自住[N];房地产时报;2006年
8 本报通讯员 宋晨;快递助力发票犯罪[N];检察日报;2013年
9 特约评论员 刘晓忠;港交所掌舵LME赢在战略至上[N];21世纪经济报道;2012年
10 特约评论员 刘晓忠;返利乱象:野蛮成长下的致命诱惑[N];21世纪经济报道;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前8条
1 陈起阳;内幕交易主体问题实证研究[D];吉林大学;2016年
2 张扬;C2C电子商务交易主体信誉评估模型研究[D];内蒙古大学;2016年
3 王爱华;中国林业碳汇交易主体法律权益保障研究[D];西南政法大学;2012年
4 翟书晓;我国内幕交易主体法律问题研究[D];西南政法大学;2012年
5 郑琦斐;从“瑞银诉Paramax对冲基金案”看我国信用违约掉期监管[D];暨南大学;2011年
6 李姣;电子商务主体信息可信度研究[D];复旦大学;2013年
7 杨琳;西安龙益4S店二手车交易模式设计与应用研究[D];西安建筑科技大学;2014年
8 杨晓莲;证券市场内幕交易若干问题的法律分析[D];中国社会科学院研究生院;2012年
,本文编号:2326342
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/guojimaoyilunwen/2326342.html