基于中日韩自由贸易区视角下三国贸易互补性与竞争性分析
发布时间：2018-11-15 07:40
【摘要】：中国、日本和韩国这三个国家的国际分工状况和产业结构变化可以非常形象而准确的表现出东亚地区目前的一个整体状况,如果能够很好的把这三个国家的国际分工状况和产业结构变化进行详细的研究、总结和归纳,并加以借鉴和利用,那将会对整个东亚地区的产业结构和经济发展合作都产生非常深远的重要意义。中国、韩国和日本在最开始的东亚地区的雁行模式中都分别处于三个不同的阶段层次,三国的优劣势互不相同,产业结构也不尽相同,三国之间在资源和结构方面的互补性都比较明显,存在着越来越紧密的经贸合作关系。近年来随着韩国经济的腾飞,中国经济的迅猛追赶,中日韩三国之间产业结构的差距呈现出逐渐缩小的趋势,越来越多行业和产业的发展都在逐渐的向日本看齐。所以,三个国家现在在一些资本密集型和技术密集型产业上也都形成了相互竞争的形势。本文从对外贸易的角度,研究了三国之间商品和贸易结构以及竞争性、互补性和国际分工地位都发生了哪些变化。文中采用SITC 0-9标准分类,选取了2004年、2006年、2008年、2010年和2012年五个年份进行对比分析,主要用到了四种重要指标进行分析,首先是运用贸易结合度指数进行对比,考察中、日、韩三边贸易发展的具体情况,然后通过贸易竞争指数判断三个国家的优势产业所在以及各国的优势产业是否重合,同时还要考察三个国家之间的贸易互补性指数,看看三个国家之间贸易关系的紧密程度。最后在对三个国家分析完了所有的指数之后,又对三国成立自贸区进行贸易合作这条道路上会遇到的困难进行了剖析,并给出了相应的建议。为什么要选取这四种指标,原因是他们之间有着紧密相连的关系。首先从贸易结合度这一指标了解三个国家的贸易方向,在此基础上通过TCD指数来看三国贸易结构比较相似的领域的结合度是什么样的,然后再进一步的分析三国TCD值大的领域里哪个国家的哪类产品更具有优势,最后利用TCI指数从另一个角度查看三国结合度高以外的领域里是不是具有互补性,可以进行互补。这样就比较全面。因为本文主要看中国国际地位的变化,所以主要研究中日和中韩国家之间的贸易关系及其变化。
[Abstract]:The international division of labor and the changes in the industrial structure of China, Japan and South Korea can very vividly and accurately represent the current overall situation in East Asia. If the international division of labor and the changes in industrial structure of these three countries can be well studied, summarized and summarized, and used for reference, It will be of great significance to the industrial structure and economic development of the whole East Asia. China, South Korea and Japan are all at three different stages in the initial wild goose travel pattern in East Asia. The advantages and disadvantages of the three countries are different, and the industrial structure is also different. The resources and structure of the three countries are obviously complementary, and there are more and more close economic and trade cooperation relations between the three countries. In recent years, with the rapid development of Korean economy and the rapid catch-up of Chinese economy, the gap between the industrial structure of China, Japan and South Korea has gradually narrowed, and more industries and industries are gradually in line with Japan. As a result, all three countries are now competing with each other in capital-intensive and technological-intensive industries. From the perspective of foreign trade, this paper studies the changes of commodity and trade structure, competitiveness, complementarity and international division of labor among the three countries. This paper adopts SITC 0-9 standard classification, selects 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010 and 2012 five years to carry on the comparative analysis, mainly used four important indicators to carry on the analysis, first is carries on the contrast using the trade union degree index. During the inspection, the specific situation of the trilateral trade development between Japan and South Korea is examined, and then the trade competition index is used to determine whether the superior industries of the three countries are located and whether the superior industries of each country coincide. At the same time, the trade complementarity index among the three countries is also examined. Look at the degree of trade ties between the three countries. Finally, after analyzing all the indexes of the three countries, the paper analyzes the difficulties on the road of establishing free trade area and gives the corresponding suggestions. The reason for choosing these four indicators is that they are closely related. First of all, we understand the trade direction of the three countries from the index of the degree of trade integration. On this basis, through the TCD index, we can see what the degree of integration of the three countries is in the areas where the trade structure is relatively similar. Then further analysis of the three countries in the field of TCD value which country which products have more advantages, finally using the TCI index from another perspective to see whether the three countries outside the high degree of integration is complementary, can be complementary. This is more comprehensive. Because this article mainly looks at the change of China's international status, it mainly studies the trade relations and changes between China, Japan and China and South Korea.
【学位授予单位】：青岛理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：F746
本文编号：2332602
[Abstract]:The international division of labor and the changes in the industrial structure of China, Japan and South Korea can very vividly and accurately represent the current overall situation in East Asia. If the international division of labor and the changes in industrial structure of these three countries can be well studied, summarized and summarized, and used for reference, It will be of great significance to the industrial structure and economic development of the whole East Asia. China, South Korea and Japan are all at three different stages in the initial wild goose travel pattern in East Asia. The advantages and disadvantages of the three countries are different, and the industrial structure is also different. The resources and structure of the three countries are obviously complementary, and there are more and more close economic and trade cooperation relations between the three countries. In recent years, with the rapid development of Korean economy and the rapid catch-up of Chinese economy, the gap between the industrial structure of China, Japan and South Korea has gradually narrowed, and more industries and industries are gradually in line with Japan. As a result, all three countries are now competing with each other in capital-intensive and technological-intensive industries. From the perspective of foreign trade, this paper studies the changes of commodity and trade structure, competitiveness, complementarity and international division of labor among the three countries. This paper adopts SITC 0-9 standard classification, selects 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010 and 2012 five years to carry on the comparative analysis, mainly used four important indicators to carry on the analysis, first is carries on the contrast using the trade union degree index. During the inspection, the specific situation of the trilateral trade development between Japan and South Korea is examined, and then the trade competition index is used to determine whether the superior industries of the three countries are located and whether the superior industries of each country coincide. At the same time, the trade complementarity index among the three countries is also examined. Look at the degree of trade ties between the three countries. Finally, after analyzing all the indexes of the three countries, the paper analyzes the difficulties on the road of establishing free trade area and gives the corresponding suggestions. The reason for choosing these four indicators is that they are closely related. First of all, we understand the trade direction of the three countries from the index of the degree of trade integration. On this basis, through the TCD index, we can see what the degree of integration of the three countries is in the areas where the trade structure is relatively similar. Then further analysis of the three countries in the field of TCD value which country which products have more advantages, finally using the TCI index from another perspective to see whether the three countries outside the high degree of integration is complementary, can be complementary. This is more comprehensive. Because this article mainly looks at the change of China's international status, it mainly studies the trade relations and changes between China, Japan and China and South Korea.
【学位授予单位】：青岛理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：F746
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘重力;盛玮;;中日韩FTA战略比较研究[J];东北亚论坛;2008年01期
2 卢新德,邵志勤;论中日韩自由贸易区的建设[J];当代亚太;2002年12期
3 张威威;;金融动荡背景下的中日韩合作及东亚一体化[J];东南亚纵横;2009年01期
4 张小济;符合三国长远利益——中日韩构筑经济合作制度框架的选择[J];国际贸易;2003年12期
5 胡鞍钢;建立中国、中国香港特区、日本、韩国三国四方自由贸易区设想[J];国际经济评论;2001年Z2期
6 陈恒;刘佳;;中韩贸易产品结构分析[J];黑龙江对外经贸;2008年07期
7 陈建安;;中韩日自由贸易协定(FTA)的可行性及其经济效应[J];世界经济研究;2007年01期
8 陈海晶;姚顺先;;中日韩FTA的可行性及制约因素分析[J];技术与市场;2008年04期
9 刘昌黎;;中日贸易的新发展、新变化及问题[J];日本问题研究;2011年04期
10 杨伟文;黄圣平;;中日贸易互补性研究——基于制造业的实证分析[J];现代管理科学;2007年11期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 李建鹏;中日韩自由贸易区研究[D];广西大学;2007年
2 刘闯;中日韩服务贸易合作问题研究[D];东北财经大学;2013年
，本文编号：2332602
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/guojimaoyilunwen/2332602.html
