基于饮用水ICR数据库的有机物去除分析及模型建立研究
本文关键词:基于饮用水ICR数据库的有机物去除分析及模型建立研究 出处:《清华大学》2015年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
更多相关文章: NOM 常规工艺 BAC工艺 TOC去除率 ICR数据库
【摘要】:新的饮用水卫生标准中增加的有机物指标给我国的饮用水处理工艺带了极大挑战。地表水中常含有过量的天然有机物,其不仅会导致水体生物稳定性变差,还会同消毒剂反应生成有害的消毒副产物。因而研究饮用水中有机物的去除对保障饮用水的水质安全具有重要的实用价值和理论意义。本文利用美国ICR数据库,对常规工艺和生物活性炭(BAC)深度处理工艺的水厂不同工艺条件和原水水质参数下有机物的去除情况进行统计分析、模型建立、模型分析,期望对实际水厂工艺运行给出指导性建议。通过对ICR数据库中有机物的去除分析:以中位数计,原水TOC2mg/L的TOC去除率为32.9%,常规工艺的TOC去除率为31.8%,BAC工艺的TOC去除率为39.6%。常规工艺对高TOC、低碱度的原水的有机物去除效果更佳。常规工艺会选择性去除水中的憎水性有机物。Al混凝剂对有机物去除更容易受碱度影响,对于高碱度的原水建议采用Fe混凝剂。O3-BAC和一般BAC工艺的TOC去除率中位数分别42.6%和38.8%,O3-BAC相比于BAC工艺在原水TOC浓度较大时有机物去除优势更高。处理低TOC、高碱度的原水时,BAC工艺对TOC的去除效果优于常规工艺。通过多元回归分析和遗传算法优化的BP网络对常规Fe工艺、常规Al工艺、BAC工艺三种工艺下的TOC去除率进行预测建模,模型的性能分析表明两种模型都能进行较好地预测,其中遗传优化的BP模型更优。在模型建立的基础上,首先通过BP网络得到预测TOC去除率的最优输入参数组合:对常规工艺为TOC、碱度和混凝剂投加量,对BAC工艺为TOC、碱度、温度和混凝剂投加量。其次通过逆向运用最优参数组合和USEPA有机物去除标准,计算出常规工艺下不同TOC和碱度下的采用Fe、Al两种混凝剂的最优单位TOC混凝剂投加量。对比常规工艺下Fe、Al混凝剂,温度和碱度对Al混凝剂影响大于Fe混凝剂。对比常规工艺和BAC工艺,温度对BAC工艺的影响更显著,而碱度和UV254对常规工艺的影响更显著。最后运用多元回归模型定量对比了采用Al混凝剂的不同TOC和碱度下的常规工艺和BAC工艺下的TOC去除率。当原水为低碱度、高TOC或原水SUVA较高的水质,用常规工艺去除水中的有机物较适宜;当原水为高碱度低TOC或SUVA较低的水质,采用BAC工艺可以更好地去除水中的有机物。
[Abstract]:The index of organic matter increased new drinking water health standards to our drinking water treatment process with a great challenge. The surface water often contain natural organic matter in excess, it will not only lead to water biological stability becomes worse, the by-product material will react with disinfectant disinfection harmful. It has important practical value and theoretical the significance of the removal of organic compounds in drinking water to protect drinking water quality and safety. In this paper, using the ICR database, the conventional process and biological activated carbon (BAC) for statistical analysis, removal of organic water depth treatment process in different conditions and the raw water quality parameters of the model, model analysis, expectations the actual waterworks operation gives guidance. Through the analysis of the removal of organic matter in the ICR database: the median TOC2mg/L of raw water, the removal rate of TOC is 32.9%, the conventional process The removal rate of TOC is 31.8%, BAC process, the removal rate of TOC is 39.6%. the conventional process of high TOC, low alkalinity of raw water organic matter removal effect is better. The conventional process will be selective removal of hydrophobic organic coagulant.Al removal is more susceptible to alkalinity effect on organic matter, for raw water with high alkalinity with suggestions Fe coagulant.O3-BAC and general BAC process TOC removal rate of 42.6% and 38.8% respectively. The median, O3-BAC compared to the BAC process in the TOC of raw water at high concentrations of organic matter removal advantage more. Treatment of low TOC, high alkalinity of raw water, BAC process on the removal of TOC is better than the conventional process. Through multiple regression analysis and genetic optimization of BP network on the conventional Fe process, conventional Al process, BAC process of three kinds of process, the removal rate of TOC for predictive modeling, analysis showed that the two models can better predict the performance of the model, including genetic optimization The BP model is better. Based on this model, firstly, through the BP network to get the prediction of optimal input parameter combinations of TOC removal rate of the conventional process is TOC, alkalinity and coagulant dosage, the basicity of BAC process is TOC, temperature and dosage of coagulants. Then by using optimal reverse parameter combination and USEPA organic matter removal standard, calculated by using different Fe TOC and alkalinity under conventional conditions, Al two kinds of coagulant TOC optimal coagulant dosage. Compared with the conventional process under Fe Al, coagulant, temperature and alkalinity of Al coagulant effect than Fe coagulant. Compared with conventional process and the influence of temperature on the BAC process, BAC process is more significant, and the effect of basicity and UV254 on conventional process is more significant. Finally using quantitative multivariate regression models were compared with the conventional process and BAC process in different TOC and alkalinity using Al coagulant under the TOC removal rate. When raw water is low alkalinity and high TOC or raw water SUVA has higher water quality, it is more suitable to remove organic matter in water by conventional process. When raw water is high alkalinity, low TOC or SUVA low water quality, BAC technology can better remove organic matter in water.
【学位授予单位】:清华大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:TU991.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 乐毅;;提高企业常规工艺水平的几点浅见[J];机械制造;1987年09期
2 ;要重视常规工艺的发展提高[J];航空工艺技术;1979年11期
3 漆文光;陆少鸣;常颖;;强化常规工艺对苯酚污染的应急处理技术研究[J];供水技术;2008年06期
4 肖友道;;藻类对常规工艺水厂的影响研究[J];广东化工;2011年01期
5 吕丽行,黄露霞;国内给水厂常规工艺改造的必要性和措施[J];工业安全与环保;2004年08期
6 韩宏大;周玉文;何文杰;;强化常规工艺处理黄河原水的试验研究[J];中国给水排水;2006年05期
7 刘文飞,张玉先;水处理常规工艺对原水水质变化的适应性[J];净水技术;2005年05期
8 张姝佳;王秀花;;给水处理常规工艺除污染特性初探[J];科技传播;2011年14期
9 韩晓刚;黄廷林;;水厂常规工艺去除有机物和总磷[J];环境工程学报;2013年05期
10 石明岩,张军,崔福义,张海龙;给水处理常规工艺除污染特性初探[J];净水技术;2003年01期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 张晶亮;苑明娥;王伟;王坤;;净水厂深化常规工艺除藻的研究与实践[A];2011全国给水排水技术信息网年会暨技术交流会论文集[C];2011年
2 江家登;高乃云;;藻类对常规工艺的影响及强化混凝技术高效处理高藻水[A];2009水业高级技术论坛论文集[C];2009年
3 林清丽;张克峰;贾瑞宝;;浮滤池处理引黄水库水的试验研究[A];2006年山东省制冷空调学术年会“格力杯”优秀论文集[C];2006年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 邵筱琳;常规工艺强化让老水厂焕发新活力[N];中国建设报;2013年
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 皇甫小留;纳米MnO_2凝聚动力学及其在强化常规工艺去除痕量铊的研究[D];哈尔滨工业大学;2015年
2 梁爽;超滤组合工艺除藻效能及影响因素研究[D];北京工业大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 刘晓旭;基于饮用水ICR数据库的有机物去除分析及模型建立研究[D];清华大学;2015年
2 陈秀珍;西安市曲江水厂原水水质特征及常规工艺运行效果分析[D];西安建筑科技大学;2010年
3 郭伟锋;常规工艺处理天津滦河原水的优化试验研究[D];西安建筑科技大学;2008年
,本文编号:1416790
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jianzhujingjilunwen/1416790.html