批判性景观:兼论景观都市主义的真实与虚妄

发布时间：2018-02-25 15:27

本文关键词： 景观都市主义文化逻辑过程性不确定性批判性景观　出处：《清华大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：从理论的维度来说,本文考察和研究近十几年来在国际上最具影响力的风景园林理论之一:景观都市主义。它目前处于这样一种现实状态:无论在国外还是国内学术界,景观都市主义的理论研究呈现出“虚妄性”和“真实性”两种相互矛盾的面孔。如何站在客观的立场上对其理论本质进行深度剖析,通过将论述的重心放置在景观都市主义理论的历史格局、当代结构、未来潜力三个方面,还原其真实性,批判其虚妄性,延展其可能性,便是本文理论研究的中心议题。从实践的维度来说,本文关注风景园林领域最大的困境之一,即理论与实践的关系,它目前处在这样的一种基本态势:狂热的实践浪潮背后缺乏理论支撑,有限的理论研究缺席了实践探索,风景园林实践与理论之间从未在某一个点上实现真正意义上的双向交流。如何在文化逻辑的思考框架下,敏锐地分析出景观都市主义理论可能的内在潜质,加以演绎和扩展之后,提议一种批判性景观的理论,进而指导场地的规划设计,就成为本文实践研究的中心议题。首先,从历史的谱系进行分析,说明景观都市主义既挣脱了形式、风格、意义等理论格局,又继承了环境生态主义、交叉综合性、场地主导等理论脉络。从理论创新的角度,强调其积极意义在于流动性、水平性、过程性、不确定性、表面性、基础设施、异质等特征,并且使得后现代性术语第一次真正意义上被引入到风景园林领域中;景观都市主义的逻辑漏洞一方面透露出后现代性文化逻辑的意识,另一方面又模糊了文化逻辑的媒介作用和尺度适用性等问题,逻辑上的错位和意识上的统一限制其理论延展的可能。其次,从未来潜力的维度看,景观都市主义可以导向一种具有积极性的、文化创造力的批判性景观。最后,从理论支撑的实践和理论与实践分离两个层面来说,以风景园林作为一种具备主动批判的文化力量,场地的空间策略能够通过文化逻辑作为媒介,充分表达出一种政治愿景、社会机制、文化表征、生态持续的战略性艺术形式的理论基础,指导空间的规划设计。因此,本文选取景观都市主义作为理论研究的本体,一方面通过历史阐释的方式解读其存在的谱系,一方面通过批判性的方式分析其可能存在的利弊,最后将景观都市主义牵涉出的进一步研究成果(即批判性景观)作为实践项目的理论支撑,完成某种涉及到风景园林历史、理论、批判和实践的自循环体系的整合性研究设计的尝试。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of theory, this paper examines and studies one of the most influential landscape architecture theories in the world in recent decades: landscape urbanism. The theoretical study of landscape urbanism presents two kinds of contradictory faces: "falsehood" and "truthfulness". How to analyze the theoretical essence of landscape urbanism from an objective standpoint, By focusing on the historical pattern, contemporary structure and future potential of landscape urbanism theory, the author restores its authenticity, criticizes its falsehood, and extends its possibility. From the perspective of practice, this paper focuses on one of the biggest dilemmas in the field of landscape architecture, that is, the relationship between theory and practice. It is currently in such a basic situation: there is a lack of theoretical support behind the fanatical wave of practice, and limited theoretical research is absent from practical exploration. There has never been a real two-way communication between landscape architecture practice and theory at a certain point. Under the framework of cultural logic, how to analyze the potential of landscape urbanism theory acutely under the framework of cultural logic, After deducing and expanding, a critical landscape theory is proposed to guide the planning and design of the site, which becomes the central topic of this paper's practical research. First of all, from the historical pedigree analysis, It shows that landscape urbanism not only breaks free from the theoretical pattern of form, style and meaning, but also inherits the theoretical context of environmentalism, cross-integration and location-leading. From the perspective of theoretical innovation, it emphasizes that its positive significance lies in fluidity. Horizontal, process, uncertainty, surface, infrastructure, heterogeneity, and so on, and make post-modernity terms really introduced into the field of landscape architecture for the first time; On the one hand, the logic loophole of landscape urbanism reveals the consciousness of post-modernity cultural logic, on the other hand, it obscures the media function and yardstick applicability of cultural logic. Logical dislocation and the unity of consciousness limit the possibility of theoretical extension. Secondly, from the perspective of future potential, landscape urbanism can lead to a positive, culturally creative critical landscape. From the two aspects of practice supported by theory and separation of theory and practice, landscape architecture as a cultural force with active criticism, the space strategy of the site can fully express a political vision through cultural logic as a medium. Social mechanism, cultural representation, ecological sustainable strategic art form of the theoretical basis, guiding the planning and design of space. On the one hand, it interprets the genealogy of its existence by way of historical interpretation, on the other hand, it analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of its possible existence through critical means. Finally, the further research results (i.e. critical landscape) involved in landscape urbanism are taken as the theoretical support of the practical project to complete a certain kind of landscape architecture history, theory, Criticism and practice of self-cycle system of integration research and design attempt.
【学位授予单位】：清华大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：TU984.1

【参考文献】