中美钢结构设计规范对比及工程应用分析

发布时间：2018-04-08 08:38

本文选题：设计规范　切入点：对比　出处：《西安建筑科技大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：土建结构工程不同于工艺系统设备安装工程,在海外项目中往往面临不同国家和业主的具体、差异化要求,工程设计和施工在沟通和确认过程中困难较大。国内工程人员非常有必要学习国外规范,了解国内国外规范的异同点。美国规范在美国政府指导支持下,通过行业协会、科研单位、高等院校、企业公司的研究推动,持续更新发展,反映着行业领域最新的研究成果,是国际上被广泛采用和接受的标准体系,对国内科研和工程人员具有很好的学习参考价值。本文就中美规范中国内设计人员重点关心的一些内容进行对比,结合实际工程进行分析,主要内容包括:(1)中美风荷载设计规范对比,介绍对比了中美规范中风荷载的基本定义、参数取值和设计方法。(2)中美抗震设计规范对比,介绍对比了中美抗震设防水准,场地类别、建筑形体规则性及结构体系、地震反应谱参数、结构抗震分析、抗震等级划分、抗震缝设置及钢框架抗震要求等内容。(3)中美钢结构设计规范对比,介绍对比了中美钢结构规范中轴心受压构件、受弯构件及压弯构件的设计方法。(4)按照中美规范要求,使用国际通用结构分析设计程序STAAD进行了完整的工程算例计算对比。综合考虑了钢结构设计的荷载组合、材料强度、计算长度、规范检验等因素,对钢结构设计中常用的梁、柱、支撑构件分别给出了对比统计数据,给出了中美钢结构设计安全度水平的差异结论。
[Abstract]:The civil structure engineering is different from the process system equipment installation project, in the overseas project often faces the different countries and the owner's concrete, the difference request, the engineering design and the construction in the communication and the confirmation process is difficult.It is very necessary for domestic engineers to study foreign codes and understand the similarities and differences between them.With the guidance and support of the US government, the US norms are continuously updated and developed through the research of industry associations, scientific research institutions, institutions of higher learning, and enterprise companies, reflecting the latest research results in the field of the industry.It is a standard system widely adopted and accepted in the world. It has good reference value for domestic scientific research and engineering personnel.In this paper, the author compares some important contents of Chinese and American codes that designers are concerned about in China, and analyzes them in combination with actual projects. The main contents include comparison of wind load design codes between China and the United States, and the basic definition of stroke load in Chinese and American codes is introduced and compared.The comparison between Chinese and American codes for seismic design is presented, including the level of seismic fortification, the category of site, the regularity of building form, the structural system, the parameters of seismic response spectrum, the seismic analysis of structures and the classification of seismic grade.Comparing the design codes of steel structures between China and the United States, the design methods of axial compression members, flexural members and compression bending members in the code for steel structures in China and the United States are introduced and compared according to the requirements of the Chinese and American codes.A complete engineering example is calculated and compared by using the international general structural analysis and design program STAAD.Considering the factors of load combination, material strength, calculation length, code inspection and so on in steel structure design, the comparative statistical data of beam, column and bracing members commonly used in steel structure design are given respectively.The difference of safety level of steel structure design between China and America is given.
【学位授予单位】：西安建筑科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：TU391

【参考文献】

中国期刊全文数据库前10条

1 张维秀;王为;张元琦;;中美规范风荷载的对比分析[J];石油化工设计;2014年04期

2 吴桂芳;;中美抗震规范地震作用的比较分析[J];建筑结构;2012年S1期

3 顾强;孙国华;;中美抗震规范的钢结构设计水平地震作用[J];苏州科技学院学报(工程技术版);2011年03期

4 曾凡振;侯建国;李扬;;中美抗震规范地基土液化判别方法的比较研究[J];建筑结构学报;2010年S2期

5 沈祖炎;孙飞飞;;关于钢结构抗震设计方法的讨论与建议[J];建筑结构;2009年11期

6 朱文静;O雨林;夏文娟;闫帅平;;中美抗震规范地震作用计算方法对比分析[J];华中科技大学学报(城市科学版);2009年03期

7 马卉;王玉东;;中美建筑抗震设计方法的对比[J];唐山学院学报;2009年03期

8 罗开海;王亚勇;;中美欧抗震设计规范地震动参数换算关系的研究[J];建筑结构;2006年08期

9 李茂华,侯建国;中外钢结构设计规范安全度设置水平的比较研究[J];建筑钢结构进展;2005年04期

10 陈绍暮;;钢压杆绕弱轴受弯时的弯扭屈曲[J];西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版);1981年04期