乡村文化遗产保护开发的历程、方法与实践——基于中法经验的比较

发布时间：2018-04-14 10:16

本文选题：乡村 + 文化遗产　；参考：《城市规划学刊》2016年06期

【摘要】：1980年代以来的快速城镇化对中国乡村地区的社会、经济、文化形成了全面冲击,传统村落的文化遗产也遭受了严重的破坏。如何看待文化遗产的价值,如何从被动保护转向可持续利用文化遗产,实现乡村的经济复兴和社会重建——这需要建立国际比较的视角从"发展历程,制度框架、实施步骤"三个方面,时法国经验进行了梳理,指出:遗产概念的建立是工业化时期法国乡村面对经济衰退、人口减少和文化认同危机的一种积极回应;遗产保护在依托法定规划的同时,也需要行业和地区合约的补充;除了清点和划定保护区,教育培训、宣传推广和旅游开发也成为实施保护的关键步骤。最后,结合实际案例,将中国乡村文化遗产保护的发展历程、现行制度和实施效果与法国经验进行了比较,提出法国经验在中央地方合作、动员社会力量参与、保护与发展并重三方面的借鉴价值。
[Abstract]:The rapid urbanization since 1980s has had an overall impact on the society, economy and culture of China's rural areas, and the cultural heritage of traditional villages has also been seriously damaged.How to look at the value of cultural heritage, how to move from passive protection to sustainable use of cultural heritage, and how to realize the economic rehabilitation and social reconstruction of rural areas requires the establishment of an international comparative perspective from the "development process, institutional framework,"The author points out that the establishment of the concept of heritage is a positive response to the crisis of economic decline, population reduction and cultural identity in the French countryside during the period of industrialization.In addition to counting and designating protected areas, education and training, publicity and tourism development are also key steps in the implementation of conservation.Finally, combining with the actual cases, this paper compares the development course, current system and implementation effect of Chinese rural cultural heritage protection with the French experience, and points out that the French experience cooperates in the central and local government and mobilizes the social forces to participate.Protection and development of the three aspects of the value of reference.
【作者单位】：同济大学建筑与城市规划学院高密度人居环境生态与节能教育部重点实验室;上海同济城市规划设计研究院;
【基金】：上海市浦江人才计划“大型居住社区问题的形成机制与规划对策研究”(14PJ1408900) 同济大学人文社会科学青年基金“动迁安置社区居民的社会网络重构研究”(0100219146)共同资助
【分类号】：TU982.29

【参考文献】