杭州城区生产性景观应用使用后评价

发布时间：2018-06-22 11:12

本文选题：杭州 + 生产性景观　；参考：《浙江农林大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：在国家实施新型城镇化的重要战略实施之下,生产性景观作为位于城市中的一种绿色基础设施,范围涵盖了种植业、林业、畜牧业及渔业等农业产业,是可持续城市基础设施的重要组成部分,并且是一种兼具实用生产价值与景观美学价值的一种植物景观,生产性景观具有产品生产性、生态效益性以及景观提升性等特征或要素,可广泛应用于各种城市环境之中。城市中生产性景观的应用日益增多,但理论研究较为滞后,特别是缺乏一个科学的方法用于评价其使用后的效果。本文的研究对象是杭州城区的生产性景观应用的使用后评价。本文采取提出问题,搜集资料,分析成果,得出结论,优化建议这样一个思路对杭州城区的生产性景观应用进行评价。首先,本文从课题研究的背景和意义出发,梳理了相关的生产性景观理论与实践成果,同时引申出一系列有关于生产性景观的概念,如连贯式可持续生产性城市景观(CPUL)、连续景观、生产性城市景观、城市农业、有机食品(organic food)、食物里程(food miles)等。根据这些概念,得出国内外的生产性景观应用是一种集生产功能和景观美学为一体的城市景观,其主要是由使用功能、教育功能、经济功能、生态功能四大基础功能所组成的。在获得了生产性景观的基础特征之后,搜集和总结城市居民的生产性景观应用使用评价以及专家的相关评价是杭州城区生产性景观使用效果的重要依据。通过调查问卷法,对杭州城区的市民使用生产性景观的意见和建议进行了相关的材料搜集和汇总,得出杭州城区市民对本地生产性景观总体而言是满意的,尤其对生产性景观的环境美化效果以及教育意义最为满意;而对食品安全、参与程度则不够满意。随后将杭州城区的生产性景观进行了分类,提取出杭州城区最具代表性的四处生产性景观(杭州西湖、八卦田景区、西溪湿地以及杭州普通社区菜地/花田),采用AHP法(层次分析法),邀请相关专家,对这四处典型生产性景观进行评分。评分的结果是八卦田景区的生产性景观得分最高,达到了3.79分,而最低的杭州普通社区菜地/花田得分仅为3分,其余两处生产性景观则比较平均。八卦田景区的得分最高主要是由于八卦田的生产性景观四季景观效果较好,同时兼具四季生产功能;社区菜地/花田的生产功能较好,然而其得分较低的原因主要是由于面积较小且零散,自身景观效果较为一般等。运用使用后评价的方法,对杭州城区的生产性景观应用评价进行分析,得出杭州城区的生产性景观应用基本都能使使用者满意。但杭州城区生产性景观目前的不足之处主要是分布较为分散,且数量不足,宣传不到位,空间结构不够丰富,产品安全性不足,养护管理较差,缺乏教育性,微气候改善功能不足等。据此,本文提出了切实可行的优化建议。
[Abstract]:Under the implementation of the country's important strategy of implementing new urbanization, productive landscape, as a green infrastructure located in the city, covers farming, forestry, animal husbandry and fisheries. It is an important component of sustainable urban infrastructure, and a plant landscape with both practical production value and landscape aesthetic value. The characteristics or elements of ecological efficiency and landscape upgrading can be widely used in various urban environments. The application of productive landscape in cities is increasing day by day, but the theoretical research is lagged behind, especially the lack of a scientific method to evaluate the effect of using it. The research object of this paper is the post-use evaluation of the productive landscape application in Hangzhou urban area. In this paper, we put forward questions, collect data, analyze the results, draw a conclusion and optimize the suggestion to evaluate the application of productive landscape in Hangzhou urban area. First of all, based on the background and significance of the research, this paper combs the related theory and practice of productive landscape, and extends a series of concepts about productive landscape. Such as continuous sustainable productive urban landscape (CPUL), continuous landscape, productive urban landscape, urban agriculture, organic food (organic food), food mileage (food miles) and so on. According to these concepts, the productive landscape application at home and abroad is a kind of urban landscape which integrates production function and landscape aesthetics, which is mainly composed of four basic functions: use function, education function, economic function and ecological function. After obtaining the basic characteristics of the productive landscape, it is important to collect and summarize the application evaluation of the productive landscape of urban residents and the related evaluation of the experts. Through the questionnaire method, the author collects and summarizes the opinions and suggestions on the use of productive landscape in Hangzhou urban area, and draws the conclusion that the residents of Hangzhou urban area are satisfied with the local productive landscape in general. Especially for the productive landscape landscaping effect and educational significance is the most satisfactory, but for food safety, participation degree is not satisfied. Then, the productive landscape of Hangzhou urban area is classified, and the most representative four productive landscapes in Hangzhou urban area are extracted (Hangzhou West Lake, Bagua Field Scenic spot, Xixi Wetland and vegetable Field / Flower Field in Hangzhou Community), AHP (Analytic hierarchy process) is adopted, and relevant experts are invited to rate the four typical productive landscapes. The results showed that the highest score of productive landscape was 3.79, while the lowest score of vegetable land / flower field in Hangzhou community was only 3, and the other two productive landscape were average. The highest score of the scenic spot is mainly due to the productive landscape of the four seasons landscape effect is better, at the same time has the production function of the four seasons, the community vegetable field / flower field production function is better, However, the main reason for its low score is that the area is small and scattered, and its own landscape effect is relatively general. By using the method of post-use evaluation, this paper analyzes the application evaluation of productive landscape in Hangzhou urban area, and draws the conclusion that the application of productive landscape in Hangzhou urban area can basically satisfy the users. However, the main deficiencies of the productive landscape in Hangzhou urban area at present are that the distribution is relatively scattered, and the quantity is insufficient, the propaganda is not in place, the space structure is not rich enough, the product security is insufficient, the maintenance management is poor, and the education is lacking. The function of microclimate improvement is insufficient. On the basis of this, the paper puts forward practical and feasible suggestions for optimization.
【学位授予单位】：浙江农林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：TU984.1

【相似文献】