【摘要】:Samarkand is a city in modern-day Uzbekistan and is one of the oldest inhabited cities in Central Asia.There is evidence of human activity in the area of the city from the late Paleolithic era,though there is no direct evidence of when exactly Samarkand proper was founded;some theories are that it was founded between the 8th and 7th centuries BC.Prospering from its location on the Silk Road between China and the Mediterranean,at times Samarkand was one of the greatest cities of Central Asia.The city is noted for being an Islamic Centre for scholarly study.In the 14 th century it became the capital of the empire of Timur(Tamerlane)and is the site of his mausoleum(the Gur-e Amir).The Bibi-Khanym Mosque(a modern replica)remains one of the city's most notable landmarks.The Registan was the ancient center of the city.The city has carefully preserved the traditions of ancient crafts: embroidery,gold embroidery,silk weaving,engraving on copper,ceramics,carving and painting on wood.The major monuments include the Registan mosque and madrasahs,originally built in mud brick and covered with decorated ceramic tiles,the Bibi-Khanum Mosque and Mausoleum,the Shakhi-Zinda compound which contains a series of mosques,madrasahs and mausoleum,and the ensembles of Gur-Emir and Rukhabad,as well as the remains of Ulugh-Bek's Observatory.The Registan Square is a real gem located in the very heart of the ancient city of Samarkand.It has gained its worldwide fame thanks to the great architectural ensemble that has become a monument of the oriental architecture.From three sides,the square is surrounded with grand madrassah,portals of which are facing the center of the space.All three erections have their own unique décor.It is by virtue of these buildings,preserved on the territory of the city,Samarkand was included in the UNESCO World Heritage List in 2001.The aim of this research work is to assess and discuss the strategies employed or adopted in Architectural heritage conservation of buildings/structures of Registan Square in the ancient Samarkand,Uzbekistan;with a view of identifying,evaluating and ranking the conservation strategies affecting buildings/structures in the ancient Samarkand,Uzbekistan.The data used for this research work consist of Primary sources of data and Secondary sources of data.The Secondary sources of data such as journals,conference/seminar/workshop papers,text books,newspapers,magazines and the internet etc.was used to review literatures to help in identifying the preservation / conservation strategies of Registan Square.These formed the main body of the research questionnaire.The Primary source of data for this research was obtained by administering the questionnaire to seek the opinions,perceptions and perspectives of the various stakeholders within this Area.A physical observation and inspection of the buildings under study was employed in this work.All Structures of architectural heritage,by their very nature and history(material and assembly),present a number of challenges in diagnosis and restoration that limit the application of modern legal codes and building standards.The obligation to conserve the architectural heritage of our local communities is as important as our duty to conserve the significant built heritage and its values or traditions of previous eras.More than ever,architectural heritage everywhere is at risk from a lack of appreciation,experience and care.Some have already been lost and more are in danger.It is a living heritage and it is essential to understand define,interpret and manage it well for future generations.This research work identified,evaluated / assessed and ranked ten conservation strategies used in the conservation of Registan Square as a Heritage in Samarkand city of Uzbekistan.These strategies were Redesign,Remodeling,Restoration,Renovation,Rehabilitation Reconstruction,Re-creation,Refacing,Rejuvenation and Reinvigoration.The data obtained were from 200 number of questionnaires distributed,out of which 83 number(41.5%)were not returned;while 117 number(58.5%)were returned.This shows that the response was good.Conservation strategies such as Re-facing,Remodeling,Restoration,Renovation,and Redesign are the top five that have ease of implementation,most effective with very good performance in the conservation of Registan square.Reconstruction / Rebuild,Rejuvenation followed these as the next important conservation strategies.Reinvigoration,Recreate and Rehabilitation are the bottom three strategies with least ranking in terms of ease of implementation,effectiveness and performances in the conservation of Registan square.In the overall analysis,all the ten Conservation strategies have an above average ranking in terms of ease of implementation,effectives and good performances in the conservation of Registan square.The test of the research hypotheses rejected the null hypothesis and accepted the alternative hypothesis,which states,“Architectural heritage conservation strategies employed / adopted in Registan Square in Samarkand have significant impact on the buildings/structures in the ancient Samarkand,Uzbekistan”.These clearly indicates that these outlined ten conservation strategies adopted and employed in the conservation of Registan Square as Architectural heritage in the ancient Samarkand,Uzbekistan have significant impact in terms of ease of implementation,effectiveness and performances in the conservation of Registan square.
【学位授予单位】:东南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2018
【分类号】:TU-87
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 Dong Zhiwen;Wang Ying;;Research on the Protection of World Heritage in China[J];学术界;2017年07期
2 王樱烨;;The significance of protecting intangible cultural heritage[J];校园英语;2019年09期
3 彼得·斯通;;Protecting cultural heritage as an ambassador for peace[J];长江文化论丛;2017年00期
4 Sudeshna Sarkar;;The Common Thread[J];Beijing Review;2016年49期
5 Ji Jing;;Traces of the Past[J];Beijing Review;2016年50期
6 王Ze约;;The Ownership of Heritage Area with the Conservation Management Apporach——Taking Tianzifang and The Rock as Case Studies[J];环球市场信息导报;2016年34期
7 程艳;李贺;;西藏现代公共文化服务体系中的藏戏传承(英文)[J];China's Ethnic Groups;2016年06期
8 Fran?ois Dubé;;Crossing Cultural Borders[J];ChinAfrica;2017年01期
9 Fran?ois Dubé;;Crossing Cultural Borders[J];Beijing Review;2017年Z1期
10 Nancy Byrd Turner;;爱国的人[J];新高考(英语进阶);2016年11期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 Jean-Louis Luxen;;人类可持续发展中的综合性保护(英文)[A];北京论坛(2007)文明的和谐与共同繁荣——人类文明的多元发展模式:“人类遗产对文明进步的启示”考古分论坛论文或摘要集[C];2007年
2 ;Preservation of earthen heritage sites on the Silk Road,northwest China from the impact of the environment[A];中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所第11届(2011年度)学术年会论文集(中)[C];2012年
3 苏迪德;;(Industrial) Heritage that Hurts:European Approaches to our Dark Pasts[A];地理学核心问题与主线——中国地理学会2011年学术年会暨中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所建所五十年庆典论文摘要集[C];2011年
4 H.Detlef Kammeier;;文化与自然遗产的管理:条件、需求、管理计划和实施(英文)[A];北京论坛(2007)文明的和谐与共同繁荣——人类文明的多元发展模式:“人类遗产对文明进步的启示”考古分论坛论文或摘要集[C];2007年
5 ;World Heritage Classification and Related Issues—A Case Study of the“Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage”[A];文明的和谐与共同繁荣:人类文明的多元发展模式——北京论坛(2007)论文选集[C];2007年
6 ;Sport Industry Internationalizing Management With Strategic Human Resource Administration[A];第4届全国青年体育科学学术会议论文摘要汇编[C];2005年
7 William Chapman;;濒危的遗产——亚洲和太平洋地区的城市和城镇(英文)[A];北京论坛(2007)文明的和谐与共同繁荣——人类文明的多元发展模式:“人类遗产对文明进步的启示”考古分论坛论文或摘要集[C];2007年
8 Mohammad Rafique Mughal;;在亚洲变迁的政治和社会经济背景下人类遗产保护面临的挑战:冲突、局限和妥协(英文)[A];北京论坛(2007)文明的和谐与共同繁荣——人类文明的多元发展模式:“人类遗产对文明进步的启示”考古分论坛论文或摘要集[C];2007年
9 Neville Agnew;;中国的文化遗产教育(英文)[A];北京论坛(2007)文明的和谐与共同繁荣——人类文明的多元发展模式:“人类遗产对文明进步的启示”考古分论坛论文或摘要集[C];2007年
10 Cheng Ping;;Conservation of Industrial Cultural Heritage during Industrial Modernization[A];Modernization Science Newsletter(Vol.5,NO.3 September 2015)[C];2015年
相关重要报纸文章 前5条
1 中国社会科学院环境与发展研究中心 徐嵩龄;应将大运河视为系列遗产[N];中国文物报;2007年
2 译 袁林君 校 王运良;什么是遗产?[N];中国文物报;2013年
3 燕海鸣 美国弗吉尼亚大学社会学系;“遗产化”中的话语和记忆[N];中国社会科学报;2011年
4 本报记者 姚晓丹;重视保护冲突地区文化遗产[N];中国社会科学报;2016年
5 特约记者 浦丹丹;经典重温,瞻前顾后[N];21世纪经济报道;2010年
相关博士学位论文 前4条
1 侯松;文化话语视域中的遗产建构与重构[D];浙江大学;2014年
2 丽莎(Mara Lisa Arizaga);贵德琼毛寺的沃摩隆仁唐卡研究[D];中央民族大学;2010年
3 吕晓斌;基于产权视角的自然文化遗产保护机制研究[D];中国地质大学;2013年
4 卜琳;中国文化遗产展示体系研究[D];西北大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 马孙(VINCENDEAU MAXIME GERARD JEAN);[D];西北大学;2018年
2 ANVAR SAFAROV NORMATOVICH(安华);乌兹别克斯坦撒马尔罕古城雷吉斯坦广场的建筑遗产保护[D];东南大学;2018年
3 林钗;《应用语言学年度述评(2015)》第六篇和第九篇汉译实践报告[D];西北师范大学;2018年
4 戴越;《遗产旅游符号学》术语汉译实践报告[D];浙江大学;2017年
5 王明静;世界自然文化遗产解说汉译英失误分析[D];华中科技大学;2005年
6 吴艳华;中国传承的重新定位——《灶神之妻》后殖民解读[D];广东外语外贸大学;2004年
7 王文杰;《保护我们的文化资产—文化遗产部门的研究计划》翻译项目报告[D];四川外国语大学;2013年
8 张晓琴;《以罗杰巧克力有限公司与维多利亚市地方当局案件为例谈古建筑的非自愿认定及其保护》翻译报告[D];四川外语学院;2012年
9 王文婧;《发展中国家的文化遗产与旅游》(节选)英译汉翻译实践研究报告[D];西北大学;2017年
10 陈洁坊;探究转化学习:遗产研究课中小组学习的民族志[D];浙江师范大学;2014年
,
本文编号:
2605421