考虑外包和公平偏好的物流服务供应链订单分配研究

发布时间：2018-01-10 22:28

本文关键词：考虑外包和公平偏好的物流服务供应链订单分配研究　出处：《东北大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着企业对物流服务需求的多样化和动态化,企业自有的物流部门或与物流企业简单协作的方式已经无法满足一些客户的需求,同时企业在面临提供高质量服务和低服务成本的双重压力下,企业原有的物流服务外购模式逐渐向物流服务总承包模式转变,因此在电子商务平台下,出现了以物流服务集成商为主导的物流服务供应链模式,在物流服务供应链模式下能够提供集成化的物流服务。在供应链研究中,能力分配问题是最重要的决策之一,因此研究物流服务供应链中的能力分配问题是十分必要的。大多数经典理论认为人是完全理性的,他们纯粹追求自身利益的最大化,并不关心其他个体的行为,而学者通过进一步的实验证明,个体在现实中是有限自利的,具有公平偏好,当其他个体利益更高时,会产生嫉妒行为,而在其他个体利益更低时,会产生内疚行为。本文针对物流服务供应链的订单分配问题主要从以下几个方面进行研究：(1)建立物流服务供应链订单分配模型。模型中以物流服务集成商成本最小、物流服务提供商收益最大、物流服务提供商满意度最大和物流服务提供商的物流服务非匹配度最小为四个目标函数。模型中考虑市场需求是不确定的,物流服务提供商的要价与其提供的物服务质量水平成线性相关。通过算例进行仿真分析,得出市场需求的不确定性和物流服务提供商的质量水平对订单分配结果的影响。(2)建立考虑外包的物流服务供应链订单分配模型。当物流服务提供商不能完成物流服务集成商所要求的服务订单时,物流服务集成商会对其不能满足的订单部分进行惩罚,此时物流服务提供商为了避免惩罚,将不能满足的物流订单进行外包,并通过算例进行仿真分析,得出外包价格对物流服务订单分配的影响。(3)建立考虑外包和公平偏好的物流服务供应链订单分配模型。考虑到实际情况下物流服务提供商是有限自利的,提供商在进行订单分配时会受到其他个体的影响,因此模型加入了公平偏好理论,并进行算例仿真分析,得出物流服务提供商具有的不同公平偏好系数对订单分配结果的影响。
[Abstract]:With the diversification and dynamics of enterprises' demand for logistics services, the enterprise's own logistics department or simple cooperation with logistics enterprises can no longer meet the needs of some customers. At the same time, under the double pressure of providing high quality service and low service cost, the original outsourcing mode of logistics service is gradually changing to the general contracting mode of logistics service, so under the e-commerce platform. The logistics service supply chain mode, which is dominated by logistics service integrators, can provide integrated logistics service under the logistics service supply chain mode. Capacity allocation is one of the most important decisions, so it is very necessary to study the problem of capacity distribution in logistics service supply chain. Most classical theories think that people are completely rational. They pursue the maximization of their own interests and do not care about the behavior of other individuals, but the scholars through further experiments prove that the individual in reality is limited self-interest, with a fair preference. When the interests of other individuals are higher, jealousy will occur, and when the interests of other individuals are lower. This paper focuses on the problem of order allocation in logistics service supply chain from the following aspects: 1). The order allocation model of logistics service supply chain is established, in which the cost of logistics service integrator is the least. The logistics service providers have the largest revenue, the greatest satisfaction of the logistics service providers and the minimum mismatch degree of logistics service providers for the four objective functions. Considering the market demand is uncertain in the model. The demand price of the logistics service provider is linearly related to the quality of the material service provided by the logistics service provider. The influence of uncertainty of market demand and quality level of logistics service provider on the result of order distribution is obtained. Establish the logistics service supply chain order allocation model considering outsourcing, when the logistics service provider can not complete the service order required by the logistics service integrator. The logistics service integrator will punish the unsatisfied part of the order. In order to avoid punishment, the logistics service provider outsource the unsatisfied order and carry on the simulation analysis through the example. The effect of outsourcing price on the distribution of logistics service orders. (3) establish a logistics service supply chain order allocation model considering outsourcing and fair preference. Considering the actual situation logistics service providers are limited self-interest. The supplier will be affected by other individuals in the order allocation, so the fair preference theory is added to the model, and the simulation analysis is carried out. The influence of different fair preference coefficients of logistics service providers on the order allocation results is obtained.
【学位授予单位】：东北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：F274;F259.23

【相似文献】