Q企业供应商绩效评价方法的研究

发布时间：2018-06-16 01:35

本文选题：供应商绩效评价 + 评价指标　；参考：《中国科学院大学（工程管理与信息技术学院）》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着市场化经济运营日趋激烈,国内外经营者对企业内部管理的需求更加精细化。而对供应商的管理,作为企业成本控制的前沿阵地,具有管理范围广泛,控制节点分散,评价指标众多,内在联系复杂等特点。对供应商管理绩效评价的结果,会从战略层面直接影响企业对供应商管理方式的成败。因此,寻找一种建立在科学、合理的理论基础之上,适合企业自身特点的绩效评价方法,是很多企业所关注的问题。本文在查阅的大量文献资料和实际调研的基础上,针对Q企业的供应商绩效评价方法进行全面深入地分析与实践,主要完成了以下工作： (1)通过对Q企业现有的供应商绩效评价管理办法及2002年度供应商绩效评价结果的分析入手,总结出Q企业现有供应商绩效管理办法的优缺点及评价结果的不足之处。 (2)使用层次分析法对Q企业2012年的供应商评价数据进行重新评价,通过对比现有方法的结果寻找其中的差异,并对差异进行分析,摸索出层次分析法中建立的评价指标合并的初步想法。 (3)使用数据包络分析法再次对Q企业2012年的供应商评价数据进行重新评价,通过和现有评价方法结果以及层次分析法评价结果的对比,寻找其中的差异,并重点关注已知差异中的重点关注对象的变化,总结出各种方法自身的特点与不足。 (4)关注评价结果中特别对象在数据包络分析法与评价指标的合并叠加得到的结果中的变化,得到本文最后所选用的供应商绩效评价方法的操作步骤与数据计算方法。将新方法取得的结果与现有方法进行对比,与Q企业实际追求的理想目标进行比较,提出该方法进一步改进的指导方向。最后本文使用新方法对Q企业2012年供应商数据得出的结果取得了满意的效果,更加符合企业在供应商管理方面的目标。证明了该方法的合理性、针对性与适应性。
[Abstract]:With the market economy operation becoming more and more intense, the domestic and foreign operators' demand for the internal management of enterprises is more refined. As the front position of enterprise cost control, supplier management has the characteristics of wide range of management, decentralized control nodes, numerous evaluation indexes and complex internal relations. The results of supplier management performance evaluation will directly affect the success or failure of supplier management from the strategic level. Therefore, it is a concern of many enterprises to find a performance evaluation method based on scientific and reasonable theory and suitable for their own characteristics. On the basis of a large amount of literature and actual investigation, this paper makes a thorough analysis and practice on the supplier performance evaluation method of Q enterprise. The main work is as follows: 1) through the analysis of the existing management methods of supplier performance evaluation in Q enterprise and the results of supplier performance evaluation in 2002, This paper summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of the existing supplier performance management methods and the shortcomings of the evaluation results in Q enterprise. (2) using AHP to re-evaluate the supplier evaluation data of Q enterprise in 2012. By comparing the results of the existing methods to find the differences, and analyze the differences, This paper tries to find out the initial idea of merging the evaluation indexes established in the Analytic hierarchy process (AHP). (3) using the data Envelopment Analysis method to re-evaluate the supplier evaluation data of Q enterprise in 2012. By comparing the results of the existing evaluation methods and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), to find the differences, and focus on the changes of the known differences. Summing up the characteristics and shortcomings of various methods. (4) pay attention to the changes in the results of the evaluation of special objects in the combination of the data Envelopment Analysis method and the evaluation index. Finally, the operation steps and data calculation methods of supplier performance evaluation are obtained. The results obtained by the new method are compared with the existing methods, and compared with the ideal targets pursued by Q enterprises, and the guiding directions for further improvement of the method are put forward. Finally, this paper uses the new method to obtain satisfactory results from Q enterprise's 2012 supplier data, which is more in line with the enterprise's goal in supplier management. The rationality, pertinence and adaptability of this method are proved.
【学位授予单位】：中国科学院大学（工程管理与信息技术学院）
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：F224;F274

【参考文献】