美国房产税改革及其借鉴研究
[Abstract]:In recent years, China's real estate industry has developed rapidly, resulting in the matching property tax legal system has been unable to adapt to the speed of its development, the reform of the real estate tax legal system is imminent. The research on the experience of tax reform in advanced countries has certain guiding significance for the direction and development path of property tax reform in our country in the future. In the legal system of real estate tax in the United States, the tax burden is too heavy, the government is over-dependent on it, the role of adjusting the gap between the rich and the poor has not been brought into full play, and the cost of collection and management has remained high. In response to these problems, the United States has carried out comprehensive reforms, including reducing the tax burden on property taxes and their share of fiscal revenue; To establish an evaluation system based on ad valorem, to make the evaluation more accurate and efficient by comprehensive use of high-tech means, to apply different tax rates to different types of real estate in a single proportional tax rate, and to strengthen the role of adjusting the gap between rich and poor. Enrich continuously, perfect the system of preferential tax policy, further simplify the procedures of real estate tax, strengthen the construction of tax personnel, thus reduce the cost of collection and management. A series of reforms to the legal system of real estate tax in the United States have important implications for the construction of the real estate tax system in China. In the aspect of tax object, our country can further expand the scope of real estate tax, change the tax basis from the original value of real estate to the evaluation value, and establish a complete evaluation mechanism. In the aspect of tax preference, we should formulate preferential policies for the housing of individual residents to protect the housing rights of low-income people; in the aspect of tax collection and administration, we should further strengthen the enforcement of laws and regulations and the enforcement of illegal acts. The reform of the current property tax system in China is not a work that can be completed overnight. This reform is related to the development and change of interests of individual residents, local governments and the whole society. Therefore, on the basis of the analysis of foreign advanced experience, we should study whether or not we can implement and how to carry out our country's specific economic system and social development environment, instead of blindly copying these experiences. Only by exploring the path and method of the property tax reform can we promote the optimization and improvement of the property tax system and play its due role in the socialist construction of our country.
【学位授予单位】:云南财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:F817.12;F299.712
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 于永进,孙景仁,曲继成;房产税征管漏洞多[J];山东税务纵横;2000年12期
2 ;我们该不该再次缴纳房产税?[J];税收与社会;2000年02期
3 任寿根;论中国房产税制度非均衡[J];现代管理科学;2001年03期
4 林国喜;车间闲置房产应缴房产税[J];福建税务;2003年03期
5 张其惠;征收房产税中的误区[J];中国乡镇企业会计;2003年02期
6 魏艳华 ,水英;细说房产税[J];市场研究;2003年12期
7 ;长期闲置未用仓库需要缴纳房产税吗?[J];涉外税务;2004年06期
8 ;农民自盖的房屋需要缴纳房产税吗?[J];农民致富之友;2005年05期
9 唐杰;;征收房产税对房价的影响[J];技术与市场;2006年01期
10 石济海;;对房产税改革的几点看法[J];中国税务;2006年03期
相关会议论文 前6条
1 吉林;;房产税热下的冷思考[A];吉林省土木建筑学会2013年学术年会论文集[C];2013年
2 周元立;黎俊;;浅析应用批量技术进行房产税评估所面临的困难及对策[A];中国房地产估价师与房地产经纪人学会2011年年会论文集[C];2011年
3 姚海放;;宏观调控抑或税收法治:论房产税改革的目标[A];全面小康:发展与公平——第六届北京市中青年社科理论人才“百人工程”学者论坛(2012)论文集[C];2012年
4 米旭明;;评估命中率、公平性与房产税税基批量评估模型研究[A];2011广东社会科学学术年会——地方政府职能与社会公共管理论文集[C];2011年
5 姚海放;;宏观调控抑或税收法治:论房产税改革的目标[A];全面小康:发展与公平——第六届北京中青年社科理论人才“百人工程”学者论坛文集[C];2012年
6 傅光明;;中外财产税制的比较研究与制度设计[A];中国制度经济学年会论文集[C];2006年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 张彩霞;房产税征收难在哪里 [N];中国税务报;2005年
2 本报记者 孙继斌;学者建言我国应缓征或不征房产税[N];法制日报;2008年
3 本报记者 陈雪芹;开征房产税有望终结“炒房时代”[N];中国改革报;2010年
4 本报记者 朱宇 丁冰 周文天 林U,
本文编号:2375977
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jingjiguanlilunwen/2375977.html