环境信息披露质量对绿色债券融资成本的影响研究
本文关键词: 绿色债券 融资成本 环境信息披露 投资者预期风险 出处:《哈尔滨工业大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:随着国内外企业和投资者对于环境问题的重视程度与日俱增,目前备受推崇的环境、社会和公司治理准则在辅助投资者进行投资决策时发挥越来越重要的作用。国内外相关学者的研究已表明企业环境信息披露水平与企业进行债券融资的成本存在关联,流动性偏好理论和风险溢价理论也从侧面支持了这一观点。环境信息披露作为企业年度信息披露的重要部分之一,随着中国向低碳经济转型,企业环境保护方面政策和方针不断受到投资者的青睐,在关于投资决策方面施展越来越重要的作用。本文在相关研究的基础上,考查了不同类别的环境信息披露水平分别对企业绿色债券融资成本的影响,并从债券流动性和投资者风险预期两个角度考查了环境信息披露是通过何种路径影响企业绿色债券融资成本的。首先,本文在理论层面分析了企业环境信息披露和绿色债券融资成本的概念、内外部动因、制度背景和路径机理分析。根据投资者流动性偏好理论和风险溢价理论,在理论层面上分析了企业环境信息披露对债券融资成本的路径影响。其次,本文以沪深A债券市场302组绿色债券作为研究样本,根据2015年年度报告数据进行统计,并结合国内外学者的研究和相关理论支持,使用内容分析法构建环境信息披露指数EDI,并且使用信用利差模型估算债券融资成本,在以企业规模、资产负债率和行业属性等三个变量作为控制变量的基础上,实证分析了企业绿色债券融资成本和环境信息披露水平之间的关系。最后,本文在得出了上述相关关系的基础上,进一步研究变量间的路径分析,使用债券期限作为债券流动性的衡量指标;预期收益率作为投资者风险预期的衡量指标,并且在控制了债券信用评级和债券发行规模的基础上,使用中介效应检验法,以债券流动性和投资者预期风险作为中介变量,分别从上述两个角度研究环境信息披露水平是否是通过上述两个中介变量对企业绿色债券融资的成本产生影响的。最后,通过本文的研究发现,企业环境信息披露程度与企业绿色债券的融资成本显著负相关,且主要是通过债券流动性和投资者风险预期削减的企业融资成本。
[Abstract]:As domestic and foreign enterprises and investors pay more and more attention to environmental issues, the environment is now highly respected. Social and corporate governance guidelines play an increasingly important role in assisting investors in making investment decisions. Studies by domestic and foreign scholars have shown that the level of corporate environmental information disclosure and the cost of corporate bond financing exist. Connection. Liquidity preference theory and risk premium theory also support this view. Environmental information disclosure as an important part of the annual information disclosure of enterprises, with the transition to a low-carbon economy in China. Enterprise environmental protection policies and guidelines have been favored by investors and play an increasingly important role in investment decision-making. This paper is based on the relevant research. This paper examines the impact of different environmental information disclosure levels on corporate green bond financing costs. And from the perspective of bond liquidity and investor risk expectations, this paper examines the path through which environmental information disclosure affects corporate green bond financing costs. First of all. This paper analyzes the concept of corporate environmental information disclosure and green bond financing cost, internal and external causes, institutional background and path mechanism analysis, based on investor liquidity preference theory and risk premium theory. On the theoretical level, this paper analyzes the impact of corporate environmental information disclosure on bond financing costs. Secondly, this paper takes 302 groups of green bonds in Shanghai and Shenzhen A bond market as research samples. According to the 2015 annual report data, combined with the domestic and foreign scholars' research and related theory support, the content analysis method is used to construct the environmental information disclosure index (EDI). And use credit spread model to estimate bond financing cost, on the basis of enterprise size, asset-liability ratio and industry attributes as control variables. Empirical analysis of the relationship between corporate green bond financing costs and environmental information disclosure level. Finally, this paper further studies the path analysis between variables on the basis of the above correlation. Using bond maturity as a measure of bond liquidity; The expected rate of return is used as a measure of investors' risk expectation, and on the basis of controlling the credit rating of bonds and the size of bond issuance, the intermediary effect test method is used. Taking bond liquidity and investors' expected risk as intermediary variables. Respectively from the above two angles to study whether the level of environmental information disclosure is through the above two intermediary variables on the corporate green bond financing costs. Finally, through the study of this paper found. The degree of corporate environmental information disclosure is negatively related to the financing cost of corporate green bonds, and is mainly reduced by bond liquidity and investor risk expectations.
【学位授予单位】:哈尔滨工业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F275;F832.51;X196
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 姚蕾;王延彦;;绿色信贷政策能否改善环境信息披露与债务成本之间的关系——基于重污染行业的经验数据[J];财会通讯;2016年15期
2 周月秋;;绿色债券,市场迎来“大”发展[J];金融博览(财富);2016年05期
3 滕磊;;绿色债券的国际创新和中国路径[J];生产力研究;2016年05期
4 刘毅;孙剑;;京津冀环境治理中的绿色债券[J];北京观察;2016年01期
5 秦绪红;;发达国家推进绿色债券发展的主要做法及对我国的启示[J];金融理论与实践;2015年12期
6 王遥;曹畅;;推动绿色债券发展[J];中国金融;2015年20期
7 陈晓华;李从政;;比较分析法在“西方经济学”教学中的应用[J];当代教育理论与实践;2012年10期
8 杜莉;张鑫;;绿色金融、社会责任与国有商业银行的行为选择[J];吉林大学社会科学学报;2012年05期
9 天大研究院课题组;王元龙;;构建中国绿色金融体系的战略研究[J];经济研究参考;2011年39期
10 温忠麟,.张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云;中介效应检验程序及其应用[J];心理学报;2004年05期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 彭兴韵;;鼓励发行绿色债券 引领金融创新新理念[N];上海证券报;2016年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 郭金亚;重污染行业上市公司的环境信息披露与EVA相关性研究[D];首都经济贸易大学;2015年
,本文编号:1448756
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jinrongzhengquanlunwen/1448756.html