论我国金融衍生品市场中央对手方自律管理权与行政监管权的配置
发布时间：2018-12-18 19:20
【摘要】：目前,我国衍生品市场的发展仍处于起步阶段,四大期货交易所和上海清算所虽已在结算中承担中央对手方的职责,但其具体的权限范围未予以明确。面对这种制度和规则供给的缺乏,中央对手方在行使自律管理权过程中与行政监管权发生冲突无可避免。因此,本文试图通过揭示自律管理权的公私混合性质,分析自律管理权与行政管理权的矛盾和现状。基于该矛盾,进而尝试明确自律管理权与行政监管权的边界,构建协调的衍生品监管体制,实现有效监管。
[Abstract]:At present, the development of the derivatives market in China is still in its infancy. Although the four major futures exchanges and the Shanghai Clearing House have assumed the responsibilities of the central counterparty in the settlement, their specific scope of competence is not clear. In the face of the lack of supply of the system and rules, it is inevitable for the central counterparty to conflict with the administrative supervision in the process of exercising self-discipline management power. Therefore, this paper attempts to reveal the public and private nature of the right of self-regulatory management, and analyzes the contradiction and present situation between the right of self-regulatory management and the right of administrative management. Based on this contradiction, this paper tries to clarify the boundary between self-discipline management power and administrative supervision power, construct a coordinated derivative supervision system, and realize effective supervision.
【作者单位】： 华东政法大学;
【分类号】：D922.287;F832.5
本文编号：2386374
[Abstract]:At present, the development of the derivatives market in China is still in its infancy. Although the four major futures exchanges and the Shanghai Clearing House have assumed the responsibilities of the central counterparty in the settlement, their specific scope of competence is not clear. In the face of the lack of supply of the system and rules, it is inevitable for the central counterparty to conflict with the administrative supervision in the process of exercising self-discipline management power. Therefore, this paper attempts to reveal the public and private nature of the right of self-regulatory management, and analyzes the contradiction and present situation between the right of self-regulatory management and the right of administrative management. Based on this contradiction, this paper tries to clarify the boundary between self-discipline management power and administrative supervision power, construct a coordinated derivative supervision system, and realize effective supervision.
【作者单位】： 华东政法大学;
【分类号】：D922.287;F832.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 黄亮;;我国银行业自律管理制度解析[J];理论界;2010年09期
2 郭霖,张炳光;引进“自律管理” 完善股票市场[J];福建学刊;1992年03期
3 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 最高人民法院立案庭课题组;证交所自律管理中的司法介入[N];上海金融报;2008年
2 天津市旅游局 刘莉;对旅游行业组织自律管理的思考[N];中国旅游报;2013年
3 本报记者 周芬棉;证券法首次明确证交所“自律管理”[N];法制日报;2005年
4 袁名富;新形势下须加强金融证券法制建设[N];中国经济时报;2008年
5 上海证券交易所总经理 朱从玖;强化证券交易自律管理职能[N];证券日报;2003年
6 证券时报记者 黄婷;专家：发达地区应设金融证券法庭[N];证券时报;2008年
7 上海证券交易所法律部;强化交易所自律管理 完善市场监管体制[N];证券时报;2005年
8 上海证券交易所总经理 朱从玖;建立和发展证券市场自律管理体系[N];证券时报;2003年
9 苏江;最高院立案庭建议：建立交易所诉讼阻隔机制[N];21世纪经济报道;2008年
10 上海证券交易所总经理 朱从玖;完善证券市场自律管理体系[N];中国证券报;2003年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 杨威;从股权分置改革过程看我国证券自律管理组织的完善[D];中国政法大学;2006年
，本文编号：2386374
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jinrongzhengquanlunwen/2386374.html
