信息公开机制控制搭便车行为的效果—实验证据

发布时间：2018-01-01 03:29

本文关键词：信息公开机制控制搭便车行为的效果—实验证据　出处：《管理科学学报》2014年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：以"私人账户-公共账户"为框架,设计"无信息公开机制"、"弱信息公开机制"、"强信息公开机制"和"重复强信息公开机制"4组实验,研究不同类型信息公开机制对搭便车行为的控制效果及其稳定性.用FRI指数作为衡量搭便车行为的指标,并用Z双侧检验方法处理各对照组实验数据.研究得到的结论如下:信息公开机制会显著影响搭便车行为,强信息公开机制的影响更为强烈;信息公开机制对搭便车行为的控制效果取决于其类型,利益导向型信息公开机制加剧搭便车行为的发生,在约束导向型信息公开条件下会出现自愿惩罚者,具有一定的控制效果;信息公开机制对搭便车行为的控制不具持续性,控制能力有限.
[Abstract]:Based on the framework of "private account-public account", four groups of experiments are designed: "no information disclosure mechanism", "weak information disclosure mechanism", "strong information disclosure mechanism" and "repetitive strong information open mechanism". This paper studies the control effect and stability of different types of information disclosure mechanism on free-rider behavior. The FRI index is used as the index to measure the free-rider behavior. The results of the study are as follows: the mechanism of information disclosure will significantly affect the behavior of hitchhiker, and the mechanism of strong information disclosure will have a stronger effect on the behavior of hitchhiker; The control effect of information disclosure mechanism on hitchhiker behavior depends on its type. The benefit oriented information disclosure mechanism intensifies the occurrence of free-rider behavior, and there will be voluntary punishment under the condition of constraint-oriented information disclosure. Has certain control effect; The mechanism of information disclosure is not sustainable in controlling hitchhiker behavior, and its control ability is limited.
【作者单位】：哈尔滨工业大学经济与管理学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金资助项目(71203046)
【分类号】：F062.5
【正文快照】： 0引言在集体的行动中普遍存在这样的现象,个体成员对集体不做贡献或者做出的贡献比他人少,却能够通过某种机制分享其他成员为集体创造的利益,这种现象被称为搭便车或搭便车行为.例如一个科研团队,一些成员乐于团队分享自己的知识和经验,目的在于促进团队科研任务的顺利完成,

【参考文献】