反思和重塑马克思劳动理论的三重路径——以奈格里为中心

发布时间：2018-04-21 04:17

本文选题：劳动 + 本源性的主体创构力量　；参考：《江苏社会科学》2012年05期

【摘要】：奈格里立足劳动-工人阶级和工作-资产阶级的对抗逻辑,把劳动视为单纯的主体创造能力和获得自由的现实根源,将马克思的劳动理论重构为以本源性、创构性和绝对革命为核心的激进主体理论,强调制宪力的主体化和政治的社会化,拒绝黑格尔与马克思的任何连接。阿伦特对劳动-工作的区分与奈格里完全不同,她把劳动描述成满足人类生命需求的活动和默认暴力的前政治活动,认为马克思将自由等同于劳动解放,进而明确与社会相分离的政治之自主性和制宪原则的非对抗本性。卢卡奇和奈格里一样致力于马克思主义的本体论转向,他立足实践的社会历史范式,将劳动重塑为立足历史性、人之主体性和去目的论的历史-社会本体,恢复马克思主义中的黑格尔因素,最终割裂劳动-生产领域和政治革命。三者基于特定的理论立场,遮蔽或弱化了马克思劳动理论的科学内涵。
[Abstract]:Based on the antagonistic logic of the labour-working class and the working-bourgeoisie, Negree regarded labor as the real source of pure subjective creative ability and freedom, and reconstructed Marx's labor theory into its origin. The radical subject theory, which is centered on creation and absolute revolution, emphasizes the subjectivity of constitutional power and the socialization of politics, and rejects any connection between Hegel and Marx. Arendt's distinction between labor and work is completely different from that of Negree, who describes labor as an activity to meet the needs of human life and a pre-political activity that acquiesces to violence, arguing that Marx equated freedom with labor liberation. Then the political autonomy separated from society and the non-confrontational nature of constitution-making principle are clarified. Lukacs, like Nigri, is committed to the ontological turn of Marxism. Based on the social and historical paradigm of practice, Lukacs remoulds labor as a historical and social ontology based on history, human subjectivity and deteleology. To restore the Hegel factor in Marxism and finally to separate the labor-production field and the political revolution. On the basis of specific theoretical standpoint, they obscure or weaken the scientific connotation of Marx's labor theory.
【作者单位】：河南大学哲学与公共管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目“奈格里与拉克劳政治本体论比较研究”(项目编号:12CZX004)阶段性成果
【分类号】：A811;F091.91

【共引文献】