新制度经济学:修正还是革命

发布时间：2018-06-22 08:53

本文选题：新制度经济学 + 新古典经济学　；参考：《学术月刊》2011年05期

【摘要】：新制度经济学对新古典经济学是修正还是革命的争议对新制度经济学未来发展非常重要。从经济学是"选择的理论"还是"交换的理论"的"罗宾斯-布坎南经济学定义之争"中,我们可以梳理出新古典经济学研究"范式"或"硬核"的四大方面,即新古典经济学是"选择的理论",新古典经济学的中心理论是资源配置理论,新古典经济学以孤立个人主义为基本方法论,新古典经济学以均衡分析和最优化理论为基础。这就为判断新制度经济学对新古典经济学是修正还是革命提供了判断依据。混合模式的内在缺陷使新制度经济学不可能在新古典经济学的研究范式下得到真正的发展。新制度经济学将历史和制度纳入分析当中,从而部分回到了古典政治经济学的传统,并与布坎南定义的"交换的理论"保持了一致。因此,新制度经济学需要树立自觉的革命意识,在"交换的理论"框架下完成统一,以形成强有力的思想体系。宪政经济学是新制度经济学发展的最后归宿。
[Abstract]:It is very important for the future development of new institutional economics that whether the new institutional economics is revised or revolutionary. From whether economics is "the theory of choice" or "the theory of exchange" Robbins Buchanan economics definition dispute ", we can sort out the new classical economics research" paradigm "or" hard core "four aspects. That is, neo-classical economics is the "theory of choice", the central theory of neoclassical economics is the theory of resource allocation, the neo-classical economics is based on isolated individualism, and neo-classical economics is based on equilibrium analysis and optimization theory. This provides a basis for judging whether neoclassical economics is revised or revolutionary. The inherent defects of the mixed model make it impossible for the new institutional economics to get real development under the new classical economics research paradigm. The new institutional economics brings history and institution into the analysis, which partly goes back to the tradition of classical political economics and is consistent with Buchanan's definition of "the theory of exchange". Therefore, the new institutional economics needs to set up a conscious revolutionary consciousness and complete unification under the frame of "exchange theory" in order to form a strong ideological system. Constitutional economics is the final destination of the development of new institutional economics.
【作者单位】：上海行政学院经济学教研部;
【分类号】：F091.349

【相似文献】